Henry Jensen 1 , Camilla Hoffmann Merrild 1 , Henrik Møller 2 , Peter Vedsted 3 Show Affiliations »
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Patients who rarely consult a GP in the 19-36 months before a cancer diagnosis have more advanced cancer at diagnosis and a worse prognosis. To ensure more timely diagnosis of cancer, the GP should suspect cancer as early as possible. AIM: To investigate the GP's suspicion of cancer according to the patient with cancer's usual consultation pattern in general practice. DESIGN AND SETTING: A cross-sectional study based on survey data from general practice of 3985 Danish patients diagnosed with cancer from May 2010 to August 2010, and linked to national register data. METHOD: Using logistic regression analysis with restricted cubic splines, the odds ratio (OR) of the GP to suspect cancer as a function of the patient's number of face-to-face consultations with the GP in the 19-36 months before a cancer diagnosis was estimated. RESULTS: GPs' cancer suspicion decreased with higher usual consultation frequency in general practice. A significant decreasing trend in ORs for cancer suspicion was seen across usual consultation categories overall (P<0.001) and for each sex (males: P<0.05; females: P<0.05). GPs' cancer suspicion was lower in patients aged <55 years in both rare and frequent attenders compared with average attenders. CONCLUSION: GPs suspect cancer more often in rare attenders ≥55 years. GPs' cancer suspicion was lower in younger patients (<55 years), in both rare and frequent attenders. GPs should be aware of possible missed opportunities for cancer diagnosis in young attenders and use safety netting to reduce the risk of missing a cancer diagnosis. © British Journal of General Practice 2019.
BACKGROUND: Patients who rarely consult a GP in the 19-36 months before a cancer diagnosis have more advanced cancer at diagnosis and a worse prognosis. To ensure more timely diagnosis of cancer , the GP should suspect cancer as early as possible. AIM: To investigate the GP's suspicion of cancer according to the patient with cancer 's usual consultation pattern in general practice. DESIGN AND SETTING: A cross-sectional study based on survey data from general practice of 3985 Danish patients diagnosed with cancer from May 2010 to August 2010, and linked to national register data. METHOD: Using logistic regression analysis with restricted cubic splines, the odds ratio (OR) of the GP to suspect cancer as a function of the patient 's number of face-to-face consultations with the GP in the 19-36 months before a cancer diagnosis was estimated. RESULTS: GPs' cancer suspicion decreased with higher usual consultation frequency in general practice. A significant decreasing trend in ORs for cancer suspicion was seen across usual consultation categories overall (P<0.001) and for each sex (males: P<0.05; females: P<0.05). GPs' cancer suspicion was lower in patients aged <55 years in both rare and frequent attenders compared with average attenders. CONCLUSION: GPs suspect cancer more often in rare attenders ≥55 years. GPs' cancer suspicion was lower in younger patients (<55 years), in both rare and frequent attenders. GPs should be aware of possible missed opportunities for cancer diagnosis in young attenders and use safety netting to reduce the risk of missing a cancer diagnosis. © British Journal of General Practice 2019.
Entities: Disease
Species
Keywords:
Denmark; accessibility of health services; early diagnosis; general practice; healthcare delivery; neoplasms
Year: 2019
PMID： 30642908 PMCID： PMC6355274 DOI： 10.3399/bjgp19X700769
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Br J Gen Pract ISSN： 0960-1643 Impact factor: 5.386