Mario Mella Laborde1, M Teresa Gea Velázquez2, Jesús M Aranaz Andrés3, Gemma Ramos Forner4, Antonio F Compañ Rosique5. 1. Servicio de Cirugía General y Aparato digestivo, Hospital Universitario San Juan de Alicante, San Juan de Alicante, Alicante, España. Electronic address: wmarietem@gmail.com. 2. Servicio de Medicina Preventiva y Salud Pública, Hospital Universitario San Juan de Alicante, San Juan de Alicante, Alicante, España. 3. Servicio de Medicina Preventiva y Salud Pública, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, España. 4. Servicio de Ginecología y Obstetricia, Hospital General Universitario de Alicante, Alicante, España. 5. Servicio de Cirugía General y Aparato digestivo, Hospital Universitario San Juan de Alicante, San Juan de Alicante, Alicante, España.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: 1) To determine the perception of safety of health professionals and non-health professionals in a university hospital; 2) describe the climate of safety with its strengths and weaknesses; 3) evaluate the negatively valued dimensions and establish areas of improvement. METHOD: A cross-sectional and descriptive study carried out at the San Juan University Hospital in Alicante, where the results of the assessment of the safety culture level are collected using Hospital Survey On Patient Safety survey of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality adapted to Spanish language. RESULTS: The response rate was 35.36%. The group with the greatest participation was the physician (32.3%) and the service most involved, urgencies (9%). 86.4% had contact with the patient. 50% of workers rated the safety climate between 6 and 8 points. 82.8% did not report any adverse events in the last year. The professionals with the greatest security culture were the pharmacists and with the worst culture, the guards. No strength was identified globally. There were two dimensions that behaved like a weakness: 9 (staffing) and 10 (management support for patient safety). CONCLUSIONS: The patient's perception of safety is good, although it can be improved. No strengths have been identified. The weaknesses identified are staffing, management support for patient safety, handoffs and transitions, and safety perception.
OBJECTIVE: 1) To determine the perception of safety of health professionals and non-health professionals in a university hospital; 2) describe the climate of safety with its strengths and weaknesses; 3) evaluate the negatively valued dimensions and establish areas of improvement. METHOD: A cross-sectional and descriptive study carried out at the San Juan University Hospital in Alicante, where the results of the assessment of the safety culture level are collected using Hospital Survey On Patient Safety survey of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality adapted to Spanish language. RESULTS: The response rate was 35.36%. The group with the greatest participation was the physician (32.3%) and the service most involved, urgencies (9%). 86.4% had contact with the patient. 50% of workers rated the safety climate between 6 and 8 points. 82.8% did not report any adverse events in the last year. The professionals with the greatest security culture were the pharmacists and with the worst culture, the guards. No strength was identified globally. There were two dimensions that behaved like a weakness: 9 (staffing) and 10 (management support for patient safety). CONCLUSIONS: The patient's perception of safety is good, although it can be improved. No strengths have been identified. The weaknesses identified are staffing, management support for patient safety, handoffs and transitions, and safety perception.
Keywords:
Adverse events; Cultura de seguridad; Eventos adversos; Patient safety; Percepción de seguridad; Safety culture; Safety perception; Seguridad del paciente
Authors: A Gil-Aucejo; S Martínez-Martín; P Flores-Sánchez; C Moyano-Hernández; P Sánchez-Morales; M Andrés-Martínez; E Calvo-Doñate; M Bataller-Guerrero; M A García-García Journal: Enferm Intensiva Date: 2021-12-03
Authors: Eva María Sosa-Palanca; Carlos Saus-Ortega; Vicente Gea-Caballero; Joaquín Andani-Cervera; Pedro García-Martínez; Rafael Manuel Ortí-Lucas Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-08-16 Impact factor: 4.614