| Literature DB >> 30641932 |
Natalia Zashikhina1, Vladimir Sharoyko2, Mariia Antipchik3, Irina Tarasenko4, Yurii Anufrikov5, Antonina Lavrentieva6, Tatiana Tennikova7, Evgenia Korzhikova-Vlakh8.
Abstract
The development and application of novel nanosEntities:
Keywords: C-peptide; amphiphilic random copolymers; diabetes; encapsulation; nanoparticles; polypeptides
Year: 2019 PMID: 30641932 PMCID: PMC6359607 DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics11010027
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pharmaceutics ISSN: 1999-4923 Impact factor: 6.321
Figure 1Scheme of polymerization and preparation of self-assembled nanospheres: (A) P(Glu-co-dPhe); (B) P(Lys-co-dPhe).
Monomer ratios, polymer yields and characteristics of synthesized protected copolymers.
| Sample | Initial Ratio of NKAs: [Glu(OBzl)/Lys(Z)]/[ | Polymer Characteristics (SEC) | Polymer Yield, % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| |||
| P(Glu(OBzl) | |||||
| E(Bzl)F1 | 1/1 | 5600 | 6400 | 1.15 | 49 |
| E(Bzl)F2 | 4/1 | 6700 | 8100 | 1.20 | 70 |
| E(Bzl)F3 | 8/1 | 7100 | 9200 | 1.29 | 72 |
| P(Lys(Z) | |||||
| K(Z)F1 | 1/1 | 14,000 | 15,800 | 1.07 | 68 |
| K(Z)F2 | 4/1 | 21,500 | 24,300 | 1.13 | 55 |
| K(Z)F3 | 8/1 | 24,300 | 28,000 | 1.15 | 71 |
Composition of amphiphilic random polypeptides and polymer yields after deprotection.
| Sample | Determined Polymer Composition | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HPLC | 1H NMR | |||||
|
|
| [Glu/Lys]/[Phe] Ratio |
|
| [Glu]/[Phe] Ratio | |
| P(Glu | ||||||
| EF1 | 17 | 14 | 1.2 | 16 | 15 | 1.1 |
| EF2 | 33 | 11 | 3.0 | 37 | 10 | 3.7 |
| EF3 | 38 | 7 | 5.4 | 45 | 8 | 5.6 |
| P(Lys | ||||||
| KF1 | 34 | 34 | 1.0 | - | - | - |
| KF2 | 72 | 17 | 4.3 | - | - | - |
| KF3 | 87 | 9 | 9.5 | - | - | - |
Figure 2Dependence of hydrodynamic diameter and ζ-potential of polypeptide nanospheres on pH: (A,B)—P(Lys-co-dPhe); (C,D)—P(Glu-co-dPhe).
Figure 3Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images of P(Glu-co-dPhe) (A,B) and P(Lys-co-dPhe) (C,D) nanospheres (samples EF2 and KF2).
Figure 4Degradation of P(Lys-co-dPhe) nanospheres on time: (A,B) accumulation of free amino acids during the process for samples KF1 and KF2, respectively (HPLC); (C) Decrease of hydrodynamic size on time (DLS). Conditions of biodegradation: incubation was performed in 0.01 M PBS, pH 7.4, and at 37 °C; concentration of nanospheres was 1.0 mg/mL; concentration of papain was 0.5 mg/mL.
Figure 5Scheme of covalent modification of P(Glu-co-dPhe) particle surface.
Characteristics of nanospheres under C-peptide and C5 covalent immobilization. Conditions of immobilization: 0.01 M PBS, pH 7.4; 22 °С; 2 h.
| Sample | Amount of Bound Peptide, μg/mg of Nanospheres | Amount of Bound Peptide, nmol/mg of Nanospheres | Immobilization Efficiency, % |
|---|---|---|---|
| C-peptide | |||
| EF1 | 20 ± 4 | 5.5 | 10 ± 1 |
| EF2 | 48 ± 5 | 13.3 | 24 ± 2 |
| EF3 | 25 ± 3 | 6.9 | 13 ± 2 |
| C5 | |||
| EF2 | 16 ± 2 | 30.0 | 16 ± 2 |
Figure 6Scheme of encapsulation of C-peptide into the P(Lys-co-dPhe) nanospheres.
Dependence of encapsulation efficiency, loading content and hydrodynamic diameter of nanospheres on polymer composition and peptide.
| Sample | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C-peptide | |||||
| KF1 | 71 ± 3 | 89.5 ± 0.6 | 89.5 ± 0.5 | 79 ± 8 | 0.24 |
| KF2 | 96 ± 3 | 94.6 ± 1.0 | 94.6 ± 0.9 | 130 ± 20 | 0.16 |
| KF3 | 150 ± 10 | 95.0 ± 1.1 | 95.0 ± 1.0 | 190 ± 20 | 0.14 |
| C5 | |||||
| KF3 | 150 ± 10 | 96.2 ± 0.7 | 96.2 ± 0.7 | 178 ± 15 | 0.13 |
* measured in 0.01 M PBS, pH 7.4; ** the initial amount of peptide taken for loading was 100 µg.
Figure 7Dependence of loading capacity (LC) (A) and encapsulation efficiency (EE) (B) on initial concentration of C-peptide.
Figure 8Dependence of nanosphere’s hydrodynamic diameter on C-peptide loading content.
Formulations applied for C-peptide release study.
| Sample | Amount of C-Peptide Encapsulated, µg/mg of Nanospheres | Amount of C-Peptide Retained after 14 Days Release, µg/mg of Nanospheres |
|---|---|---|
| KF1 | 581 ± 3 | 157 ± 4 |
| KF3-HLD | 604 ± 4 | 259 ± 5 |
| KF3-MLD | 285 ± 5 | 225 ± 7 |
| KF3-LLD | 147 ± 4 | 128 ± 3 |
| KF3-HLD + heparin | 483 ± 8 | 335 ± 10 |
Abbreviations: HLD—high loaded, MLD—middle loaded and LLD—low loaded.
Figure 9Kinetics of C-peptide release from P(Lys-co-dPhe) nanospheres (37 °C, 0.01 M PBS, pH 7.4).
Figure 10Cell viability (HEK-293) after their incubation for 3 days in presence of different nanospheres (A); C-peptide and C5 peptide (B).
Figure 11Stability of different nanospheres in culture medium.
Results of isothermal titration microcalorimetry experiments.
| # | Experimental Condition | ∆ |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | C-peptide + ouabain | 0 * |
| 2 | C-peptide | −102 ± 7 * |
| 3 | C5 | −136 ± 9 * |
| 4 | C-peptide encapsulated in KF3 nanospheres (HLD) | −265 ± 19 ** |
| 5 | C-peptide encapsulated in KF3 nanospheres (LLD) | −65 ± 5 ** |
| 6 | C-peptide immobilized on the surface of EF2 nanospheres | −213 ± 16 *** |
| 7 | C5 encapsulated in KF3 nanospheres (LLD) | −54 ± 6 ** |
| 8 | C5 immobilized on the surface of EF2 nanospheres | −15 ± 4 *** |
* 0.9% NaCl was used as a control; ** KF3 nanoparticles in 0.9% NaCl was used as a control; *** EF2 nanoparticles in 0.9% NaCl was used as a control.