Literature DB >> 30641853

Comparison of clinical outcomes following minimally invasive or lumbar endoscopic unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression.

Lynn B McGrath, Gabrielle A White-Dzuro, Christoph P Hofstetter.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVEMinimally invasive lumbar unilateral tubular laminotomy for bilateral decompression has gradually gained acceptance as a less destabilizing but efficacious and safe alternative to traditional open decompression techniques. The authors have further advanced the principles of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) by utilizing working-channel endoscope-based techniques. Full-endoscopic technique allows for high-resolution off-axis visualization of neural structures within the lateral recess, thereby minimizing the need for facet joint resection. The relative efficacy and safety of MIS and full-endoscopic techniques have not been directly compared.METHODSA retrospective analysis of 95 consecutive patients undergoing either MIS (n = 45) or endoscopic (n = 50) unilateral laminotomies for bilateral decompression in cases of lumbar spinal stenosis was performed. Patient demographics, operative details, clinical outcomes, and complications were reviewed.RESULTSThe patient cohort consisted of 41 female and 54 male patients whose average age was 62 years. Half of the patients had single-level, one-third had 2-level, and the remaining patients had 3- or 4-level procedures. The surgical time for endoscopic technique was significantly longer per level compared to MIS (161.8 ± 6.8 minutes vs 99.3 ± 4.6 minutes; p < 0.001). Hospital stay for MIS patients was on average 2.4 ± 0.5 days compared to 0.7 ± 0.1 days for endoscopic patients (p = 0.001). At the 1-year follow-up, endoscopic patients had a significantly lower visual analog scale score for leg pain than MIS patients (1.3 ± 0.3 vs 3.0 ± 0.5; p < 0.01). Moreover, the back pain disability index score was significantly lower in the endoscopic cohort than in the MIS cohort (20.7 ± 3.4 vs 35.9 ± 4.1; p < 0.01). Two patients in the MIS group (epidural hematoma) and one patient in the endoscopic group (disc herniation) required a return to the operating room acutely after surgery (< 14 days).CONCLUSIONSLumbar endoscopic unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression is a safe and effective surgical procedure with favorable complication profile and patient outcomes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  AP = anteroposterior; BMI = body mass index; MCID = minimally clinically important difference; MIS; MIS = minimally invasive surgery; ODI = Oswestry Disability Index; SAP = superior articular process; ULBD = unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression; VAS = visual analog scale; full-endoscopic spine surgery; lumbar; minimally invasive spine surgery; radiculopathy; stenosis; unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression

Year:  2019        PMID: 30641853     DOI: 10.3171/2018.9.SPINE18689

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine        ISSN: 1547-5646


  13 in total

1.  Full endoscopic unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression of the cervical spine: surgical technique and early experience.

Authors:  Daniel A Carr; Isaac Josh Abecassis; Christoph P Hofstetter
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2020-06

2.  The effectiveness of percutaneous endoscopic decompression compared with open decompression and fusion for lumbar spinal stenosis: protocol for a multicenter, prospective, cohort study.

Authors:  Shuheng Zhai; Wenkui Zhao; Bin Zhu; Xin Huang; Chen Liang; Bao Hai; Lixiang Ding; Hongwei Zhu; Xianhai Wang; Feng Wei; Hongling Chu; Xiaoguang Liu
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-05-27       Impact factor: 2.562

Review 3.  Fully endoscopic lumbar spinal surgery: Is it time to change?

Authors:  R Misra; N K Rath
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2021-10-08

4.  Minimal Clinically Important Difference in Patient-Reported Outcome Measures with the Transforaminal Endoscopic Decompression for Lateral Recess and Foraminal Stenosis.

Authors:  Kai-Uwe Lewandrowski; Paulo Sérgio Teixeira DE Carvalho; Paulo DE Carvalho; Anthony Yeung
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2020-04-30

5.  Comparative Study Between Uniportal Full-Endoscopic Interlaminar and Tubular Approach in the Treatment of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Angela Carrascosa-Granada; Willian Velazquez; Ralf Wagner; Anwar Saab Mazzei; Andrés Vargas-Jimenez; Manuela Jorquera; Juan Antonio Barcia Albacar; Kita Sallabanda
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2020-05-28

6.  Osteoporotic vertebral fracture misdiagnosed as "normal postoperative phenomenon" in post decompression surgery: a case report.

Authors:  Li-Sheng Hou; Dong Zhang; Feng Ge; Hai-Feng Li; Tian-Jun Gao
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2021-01-15       Impact factor: 2.362

Review 7.  Intervertebral Disc Diseases PART 2: A Review of the Current Diagnostic and Treatment Strategies for Intervertebral Disc Disease.

Authors:  Pang Hung Wu; Hyeun Sung Kim; Il-Tae Jang
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-03-20       Impact factor: 5.923

8.  Clinical outcomes of MED and iLESSYS® Delta for the treatment of lumbar central spinal stenosis and lateral recess stenosis: A comparison study.

Authors:  Boyu Wu; Chengjie Xiong; Linying Tan; Dongdong Zhao; Feng Xu; Hui Kang
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2020-10-23       Impact factor: 2.447

9.  Comparison of lumbar endoscopic unilateral laminotomy bilateral decompression and minimally invasive surgery transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for one-level lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  Wenbin Hua; Bingjin Wang; Wencan Ke; Xinghuo Wu; Yukun Zhang; Shuai Li; Shuhua Yang; Cao Yang
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2020-11-27       Impact factor: 2.362

10.  Surgical outcomes of full endoscopic spinal surgery for lumbar disc herniation over a 10-year period: A retrospective study.

Authors:  Chien-Min Chen; Li-Wei Sun; Chun Tseng; Ying-Chieh Chen; Guan-Chyuan Wang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-11-05       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.