Literature DB >> 30641388

Aerobic co-composting degradation of highly PCDD/F-contaminated field soil. A study of bacterial community.

Wen-Yen Huang1, Huu-Hao Ngo2, Chitsan Lin3, Chi-Thanh Vu4, Acharee Kaewlaoyoong5, Totsaporn Boonsong1, Huu-Tuan Tran1, Xuan-Thanh Bui6, Thi-Dieu-Hien Vo1, Jenq-Renn Chen5.   

Abstract

This study investigated bacterial communities during aerobic food waste co-composting degradation of highly PCDD/F-contaminated field soil. The total initial toxic equivalent quantity (TEQ) of the soil was 16,004 ng-TEQ kg-1 dry weight. After 42-day composting and bioactivity-enhanced monitored natural attenuation (MNA), the final compost product's TEQ reduced to 1916 ng-TEQ kg-1 dry weight (approximately 75% degradation) with a degradation rate of 136.33 ng-TEQ kg-1 day-1. Variations in bacterial communities and PCDD/F degraders were identified by next-generation sequencing (NGS). Thermophilic conditions of the co-composting process resulted in fewer observed bacteria and PCDD/F concentrations. Numerous organic compound degraders were identified by NGS, supporting the conclusion that PCDD/Fs were degraded during food waste co-composting. Bacterial communities of the composting process were defined by four phyla (Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria, Bacteroidetes and Firmicutes). At the genus level, Bacillus (Firmicutes) emerged as the most dominant phylotype. Further studies on specific roles of these bacterial strains are needed, especially for the thermophiles which contributed to the high degradation rate of the co-co-composting treatment's first 14 days.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aerobic food waste co-composting; Catabolic activity; Next-generation sequencing; PCDD/F degraders; PCDD/F-contaminated field soil

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30641388     DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.12.312

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  4 in total

1.  Degradation and effect of 6:2 fluorotelomer alcohol in aerobic composting of sludge.

Authors:  Weichuan Qiao; Jiahui Miao; Hongmei Jiang; Qiwen Yang
Journal:  Biodegradation       Date:  2021-01-22       Impact factor: 3.909

Review 2.  A Review of Soil Contaminated with Dioxins and Biodegradation Technologies: Current Status and Future Prospects.

Authors:  Nguyen Thi Hong Nhung; Xuan-Tung Tan Nguyen; Vo Dinh Long; Yuezou Wei; Toyohisa Fujita
Journal:  Toxics       Date:  2022-05-24

3.  Aided Phytoremediation to Clean Up Dioxins/Furans-Aged Contaminated Soil: correlation between microbial communities and pollutant dissipation.

Authors:  Hacène Meglouli; Joël Fontaine; Anthony Verdin; Maryline Magnin-Robert; Benoit Tisserant; Mohamed Hijri; Anissa Lounès-Hadj Sahraoui
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2019-11-03

Review 4.  Composting and its application in bioremediation of organic contaminants.

Authors:  Chitsan Lin; Nicholas Kiprotich Cheruiyot; Xuan-Thanh Bui; Huu Hao Ngo
Journal:  Bioengineered       Date:  2022-01       Impact factor: 3.269

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.