Literature DB >> 30641207

Bioethics of establishing a CHIM model for dengue vaccine development.

Anuradha Rose1, Amrita Sekhar2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Controlled human infection models (CHIM) have been used in vaccine development to up-select and down-select potential vaccine candidates and to provide proof of vaccine efficacy, and have also been used as a basis for licensure of vaccines for cholera and typhoid by regulatory agencies. CHIM IN DENGUE VACCINES DEVELOPMENT: Dengue fever results in ∼400 million infections a year and is of significant health concern especially in India. There are currently no antivirals for the disease and the only licensed vaccine for dengue is not widely used owing to safety concerns. Controlled dengue human challenge models (DHCM) are currently being used to assess the efficacy of vaccines in development for dengue. DENGUE CHIM IN INDIA: Conducting CHIM studies in India especially for evaluation of dengue vaccine candidates will be hugely beneficial as the disease is endemic to India and hence the effect of pre-exposure to the virus on vaccine safety and efficacy can be established. However, to date no CHIM studies have been conducted in India and there is a need to educate ethics committee members, policy makers and the public on the importance of such studies and what they entail.
Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Controlled dengue human challenge models; Controlled human infection models; Dengue vaccine development; Dengvaxia

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30641207     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijid.2019.01.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Infect Dis        ISSN: 1201-9712            Impact factor:   3.623


  5 in total

1.  A situation analysis of competences of research ethics committee members regarding review of research protocols with complex and emerging study designs in Uganda.

Authors:  Provia Ainembabazi; Barbara Castelnuovo; Stephen Okoboi; Walter Joseph Arinaitwe; Rosalind Parkes-Ratanshi; Pauline Byakika-Kibwika
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2021-09-26       Impact factor: 2.834

2.  Conducting human challenge studies in LMICs: A survey of researchers and ethics committee members in Thailand.

Authors:  Jaranit Kaewkungwal; Pornpimon Adams; Jetsumon Sattabongkot; Reidar K Lie; David Wendler
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-10-10       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Ethics of alternative trial designs and methods in low-resource settings.

Authors:  Rieke van der Graaf; Phaik Yeong Cheah
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2019-12-19       Impact factor: 2.279

4.  Stakeholder views on the acceptability of human infection studies in Malawi.

Authors:  Blessings M Kapumba; Kondwani Jambo; Jamie Rylance; Markus Gmeiner; Rodrick Sambakunsi; Michael Parker; Stephen B Gordon; Kate Gooding
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2020-02-05       Impact factor: 2.652

Review 5.  Empowering local research ethics review of antibacterial mass administration research.

Authors:  Nelson K Sewankambo; Paul Kutyabami
Journal:  Infect Dis Poverty       Date:  2022-09-28       Impact factor: 10.485

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.