Daniel Condie1, Stanislav N Tolkachjov2,3. 1. Department of Dermatology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas. 2. Surgical Dermatology Group, Vestavia Hills, Alabama. 3. Epiphany Dermatology, Dallas, Texas.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The facial nerve and its branches are at risk of injury during dermatologic surgery. Few publications in the dermatologic literature discuss facial nerve injury and management. OBJECTIVE: To review facial nerve injury and management, including static and dynamic repair techniques, and to review outcomes in facial nerve reconstruction. METHODS: Two detailed literature reviews were performed using PubMed. First, articles reporting facial nerve injury and/or management in the dermatologic literature were identified. In addition, articles pertaining to outcomes in facial nerve reconstruction with a minimum of 20 patients were included. RESULTS: Fifty-three articles reporting outcomes in facial nerve reconstruction were identified and consist of retrospective reviews and case series. Most patients achieve improvement in facial symmetry and movement with nerve repair. CONCLUSION: Timing of facial nerve repair is an important consideration in management of facial nerve injury, with earlier repairs achieving better outcomes. Facial nerve repair does not result in normal facial movement, and improvements may require a year or more to be realized. Many options exist for facial nerve reconstruction, and patients with long-standing facial nerve injuries may still benefit from treatment.
BACKGROUND: The facial nerve and its branches are at risk of injury during dermatologic surgery. Few publications in the dermatologic literature discuss facial nerve injury and management. OBJECTIVE: To review facial nerve injury and management, including static and dynamic repair techniques, and to review outcomes in facial nerve reconstruction. METHODS: Two detailed literature reviews were performed using PubMed. First, articles reporting facial nerve injury and/or management in the dermatologic literature were identified. In addition, articles pertaining to outcomes in facial nerve reconstruction with a minimum of 20 patients were included. RESULTS: Fifty-three articles reporting outcomes in facial nerve reconstruction were identified and consist of retrospective reviews and case series. Most patients achieve improvement in facial symmetry and movement with nerve repair. CONCLUSION: Timing of facial nerve repair is an important consideration in management of facial nerve injury, with earlier repairs achieving better outcomes. Facial nerve repair does not result in normal facial movement, and improvements may require a year or more to be realized. Many options exist for facial nerve reconstruction, and patients with long-standing facial nerve injuries may still benefit from treatment.
Authors: Fuat Baris Bengur; Conrad Stoy; Mary A Binko; Wayne Vincent Nerone; Caroline Nadia Fedor; Mario G Solari; Kacey G Marra Journal: Tissue Eng Part B Rev Date: 2021-04-13 Impact factor: 7.376