Literature DB >> 30640751

Wrong Site Spine Surgery in the Veterans Administration.

Bradley V Watts1,2,3, Jacob R Rachlin4, William Gunnar5,6, Peter D Mills1,2,3, Julia Neily1,2, Christina Soncrant1,2, Douglas E Paull1,2,7.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Basic descriptive analysis was performed for the incident characteristics of wrong level spinal surgery in the Veterans Health Administration (VHA).
OBJECTIVE: To determine the frequency of reported occurrence of incorrect spine level surgery in the VHA, causal factors for the events, and propose solutions to the issue. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Wrong site surgery is one of the most common events reported to The Joint Commission. It has been reported that 50% of spine surgeons experience at least 1 wrong site surgery in their career, with events leading to signficant harm to patients.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We examined incorrect level spine surgery adverse events reported to the VHA National Center for Patient Safety (NCPS) from 2000 to 2017. A rate of wrong site spine surgery was determined by dividing the number of wrong site cases by the total number of spine surgeries during the study period. Similarly, a rate of wrong site surgery by orthopedist and neurosurgeons was calculated.
RESULTS: There were 32 reported cases of wrong site spine surgery between 2000 and 2017. Fourteen cases involved the cervical region, 13 the lumbar region, and 5 the thoracic region. The majority of the root causes (69% or 48 of 69 root causes) fell into 2 broad categories: problems with the radiograph or problems with the intraoperative marker. These were not mutually exclusive and several root cause analyses involved >1 of these issues.
CONCLUSIONS: Wrong level surgery of the spine is a significant safety issue facing the field that continues to occur despite surgical teams following guidelines. As poor radiograph quality and interpretability were the most common root causes of these events, interventions aimed at optimizing image quality and accurate interpretation would be a logical first action.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 30640751     DOI: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000000771

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Spine Surg        ISSN: 2380-0186            Impact factor:   1.876


  2 in total

1.  The use of image intensifier during scoliosis surgery: Perhaps not medico-legally obligatory; probably still the best practice.

Authors:  Tobias Mattei
Journal:  N Am Spine Soc J       Date:  2020-09-10

Review 2.  A perspective on wrong level, wrong side, and wrong site spine surgery.

Authors:  Nancy Epstein
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2021-06-14
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.