Literature DB >> 30640702

Clinical pathways of recovery after surgery for advanced ovarian/tubal/peritoneal cancer: an NSGO-MaNGO international survey in collaboration with AGO-a focus on surgical aspects.

Elisa Piovano1, Annamaria Ferrero2, Paolo Zola3,4, Christian Marth5, Mansoor Raza Mirza6, Kristina Lindemann7,8.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This survey assessed the implementation of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) for patients undergoing surgery for advanced ovarian cancer in three European cooperative study groups in Scandinavia, Italy, and Austria. The aim was to evaluate the landscape for future trials on ERAS pathways in ovarian cancer, because high-level evidence for such interventions is lacking.
METHODS: In July 2017, a web-based questionnaire (SurveyMonkey Inc, Palo Alto, CA, USA) was sent to centers conducting surgery for advanced ovarian cancer within the Nordic Society of Gynecologic Oncology (NSGO), Mario Negri Gynecologic Oncology Group (MaNGO) and other Italian institutions, and the Association for Gynecologic Oncology Austria (AGO Austria) (n = 100). The survey covered all aspects of an ERAS pathway including surgery, nursing, and anesthesia. We herein report on the survey findings relating to surgery, including nursing care issues; however, anesthesiologic issues will be discussed in a separate report.
RESULTS: The overall response rate was 62%. Only a third of the centers in Italy and Austria follow a written ERAS protocol compared with 60% of the Scandinavian centers. Only a minority of centers have completely abandoned bowel preparation, with the highest proportion in Scandinavia (36%). Two hours of fasting for fluids before surgery is routinely practiced in Scandinavia and Austria (67-57%, respectively), but not in Italy (5%). Carbohydrate loading is routinely administered only in Scandinavia (67%). Peritoneal drainage is used by 22% routinely and by 61% in cases of bowel resection/lymphadenectomy/peritonectomy. Early feeding with a light diet on day 0 or 1 is the standard of care in Scandinavia and Austria, but not in Italy.
CONCLUSIONS: The degree of implementation of ERAS protocols varies across and within cooperative groups. The centralization of ovarian cancer care seems to facilitate standardization of peri-operative protocols. Currently, the high heterogeneity in patterns of care may challenge an international approach to a clinical trial. © IGCS and ESGO 2019. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  enhanced recovery; fast­track; ovarian cancer; perioperative care; survey

Year:  2019        PMID: 30640702     DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2018-000021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer        ISSN: 1048-891X            Impact factor:   3.437


  3 in total

Review 1.  The implementation of enhanced recovery after surgery protocols in ovarian malignancy surgery.

Authors:  Joseph J Noh; Myeong-Seon Kim; Yoo-Young Lee
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2021-03

2.  Implementation of the ERAS (Enhanced Recovery After Surgery) protocol for hysterectomy in the Piedmont Region with an audit&feedback approach: Study protocol for a stepped wedge cluster randomized controlled trial. A study of the EASY-NET project.

Authors:  Elisa Piovano; Eva Pagano; Elena Del Piano; Federica Rinaldi; Valentina Palazzo; Paola Coata; Daria Bongiovanni; Monica Rolfo; Laura Ceretto Giannone; Deliana Veliaj; Marco Camanni; Andrea Puppo; Giovannino Ciccone
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-05-27       Impact factor: 3.752

3.  Evaluation of perioperative management of advanced ovarian (tubal/peritoneal) cancer patients: a survey from MITO-MaNGO Groups.

Authors:  Stefano Greggi; Francesca Falcone; Giovanni D Aletti; Marco Cascella; Francesca Bifulco; Nicoletta Colombo; Sandro Pignata
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2022-06-03       Impact factor: 4.756

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.