Literature DB >> 30640589

Performance evaluation of disposable inhalable aerosol sampler at a copper electrorefinery.

Eun Gyung Lee1, Peter J Grimson2, William P Chisholm1, Michael L Kashon3, Xinjian He2, Christian L'Orange4, John Volckens4.   

Abstract

This study evaluates the performance of the disposable inhalable aerosol sampler (DIAS), a new sampler developed to be more cost-effective than the traditional inhalable particle samplers and comparable to the inhalable particle sampling convention. Forty-eight pairs of the DIAS prototype and the IOM sampler were utilized to collect copper exposure measurements (23 personal and 25 area) at an electrorefinery facility. The geometric mean (GM) value of ratios of exposure data (DIAS/IOM) was 1.1, while the GM of ratios (DIAS/IOM) was 1.6 for the area exposure data, revealing 84% of the ratios were greater than one. For both personal and area exposure data, the concordance correlation coefficient tests revealed significant disagreements between the two types of samplers and suggested precision as the source of the disagreement. The estimated mean concentration was higher for the DIAS compared that for the IOM for the area exposure data (p < 0.05), while the results were comparable for the personal exposure data (p = 0.49). Overall, the DIAS generated higher exposure results compared to the IOM sampler for the area exposures. For the personal exposures, the findings were inconclusive due to inconsistent results of factors aforementioned. This study is limited to one metal component (copper) of the dust at a worksite. To date, this is the first field evaluation using personal exposure data to test the performance of the DIAS and the second evaluation using area exposure data. Thus, it will be necessary to conduct additional field evaluations with various elements to further evaluate the performance of the DIAS. In addition, particle migration to the internal walls of the cap was observed during the transportation of collected samples to a laboratory for both sampler types (6.4% for the DIAS and 7.4% for the IOM). Occupational health and safety professionals should be aware of potential errors caused from transferring samples from a field to a laboratory and should be careful not to exclude particles collected on the caps.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Copper electrorefinery; IOM sampler; disposable inhalable aerosol sampler; exposure assessment; sampling pairs; transportation loss

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30640589      PMCID: PMC6450734          DOI: 10.1080/15459624.2019.1568444

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg        ISSN: 1545-9624            Impact factor:   2.155


  14 in total

1.  Field comparison of 37-mm closed-face cassettes and IOM samplers.

Authors:  Martine Demange; Peter Görner; Jean-Marie Elcabache; Richard Wrobel
Journal:  Appl Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2002-03

2.  Overall concordance correlation coefficient for evaluating agreement among multiple observers.

Authors:  Huiman X Barnhart; Michael Haber; Jingli Song
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Estimating the generalized concordance correlation coefficient through variance components.

Authors:  Josep L Carrasco; Lluís Jover
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Comparison of lead and tin concentrations in air at a solder manufacturer from the closed-face 37-mm cassette with and without a custom cellulose-acetate cassette insert.

Authors:  Eun Gyung Lee; William P Chisholm; Dru A Burns; John H Nelson; Michael L Kashon; Martin Harper
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 2.155

5.  Laboratory study of selected personal inhalable aerosol samplers.

Authors:  Peter Görner; Xavier Simon; Richard Wrobel; Edmond Kauffer; Olivier Witschger
Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg       Date:  2010-02-10

6.  Closed-face filter cassette (CFC) sampling-guidance on procedures for inclusion of material adhering to internal sampler surfaces.

Authors:  Kevin Ashley; Martin Harper
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 2.155

7.  A Simple and Disposable Sampler for Inhalable Aerosol.

Authors:  Christian L'Orange; Kimberly Anderson; Darrah Sleeth; T Renée Anthony; John Volckens
Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg       Date:  2015-10-14

8.  Interlaboratory evaluation of cellulosic acid-soluble internal air sampling capsules for multi-element analysis.

Authors:  Ronnee N Andrews; H Amy Feng; Kevin Ashley
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 2.155

9.  Acid-soluble internal capsules for closed-face cassette elemental sampling and analysis of workplace air.

Authors:  Martin Harper; Kevin Ashley
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 2.155

10.  Wood dust sampling: field evaluation of personal samplers when large particles are present.

Authors:  Taekhee Lee; Martin Harper; James E Slaven; Kiyoung Lee; Roy J Rando; Elizabeth H Maples
Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg       Date:  2010-10-29
View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Review of Workplace Based Aerosol Sampler Comparison Studies, 2004-2020.

Authors:  James Hanlon; Karen S Galea; Steven Verpaele
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-06-25       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 2.  Recent Advances in Occupational Exposure Assessment of Aerosols.

Authors:  Martin Harper
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-09-18       Impact factor: 3.390

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.