Literature DB >> 30640112

A comparison of statistical methods and multi-criteria decision making to map flood hazard susceptibility in Northern Iran.

Alireza Arabameri1, Khalil Rezaei2, Artemi Cerdà3, Christian Conoscenti4, Zahra Kalantari5.   

Abstract

In north of Iran, flood is one of the most important natural hazards that annually inflict great economic damages on humankind infrastructures and natural ecosystems. The Kiasar watershed is known as one of the critical areas in north of Iran, due to numerous floods and waste of water and soil resources, as well as related economic and ecological losses. However, a comprehensive and systematic research to identify flood-prone areas, which may help to establish management and conservation measures, has not been carried out yet. Therefore, this study tested four methods: evidential belief function (EBF), frequency ratio (FR), Technique for Order Preference by Similarity To ideal Solution (TOPSIS) and Vlse Kriterijumsk Optimizacija Kompromisno Resenje (VIKOR) for flood hazard susceptibility mapping (FHSM) in this area. These were combined in two methodological frameworks involving statistical and multi-criteria decision making approaches. The efficiency of statistical and multi-criteria methods in FHSM were compared by using area under receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve, seed cell area index and frequency ratio. A database containing flood inventory maps and flood-related conditioning factors was established for this watershed. The flood inventory maps produced included 132 flood conditions, which were randomly classified into two groups, for training (70%) and validation (30%). Analytical hierarchy process (AHP) indicated that slope, distance to stream and land use/land cover are of key importance in flood occurrence in the study catchment. In validation results, the EBF model had a better prediction rate (0.987) and success rate (0.946) than FR, TOPSIS and VIKOR (prediction rate 0.917, 0.888, and 0.810; success rate 0.939, 0.904, and 0.735, respectively). Based on their frequency ratio and seed cell area index values, all models except VIKOR showed acceptable accuracy of classification.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Environmental management; Kiasar watershed; Modelling; Natural hazard; Soil erosion

Year:  2019        PMID: 30640112     DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.01.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  3 in total

1.  Spatial-Temporal Sensitivity Analysis of Flood Control Capability in China Based on MADM-GIS Model.

Authors:  Weihan Zhang; Xianghe Liu; Weihua Yu; Chenfeng Cui; Ailei Zheng
Journal:  Entropy (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-30       Impact factor: 2.738

2.  Sub-basin prioritization for assessment of soil erosion susceptibility in Kangsabati, a plateau basin: A comparison between MCDM and SWAT models.

Authors:  Raj Kumar Bhattacharya; Nilanjana Das Chatterjee; Kousik Das
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2020-05-16       Impact factor: 7.963

3.  Evaluation of Recent Advanced Soft Computing Techniques for Gully Erosion Susceptibility Mapping: A Comparative Study.

Authors:  Alireza Arabameri; Thomas Blaschke; Biswajeet Pradhan; Hamid Reza Pourghasemi; John P Tiefenbacher; Dieu Tien Bui
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-01-07       Impact factor: 3.576

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.