Pradeep Y Ramulu1, Aleksandra Mihailovic2, Sheila K West2, Laura N Gitlin3, David S Friedman4. 1. Glaucoma Center of Excellence, Wilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA; Dana Center for Preventive Ophthalmology, Wilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA. Electronic address: pramulu@jhmi.edu. 2. Glaucoma Center of Excellence, Wilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA; Dana Center for Preventive Ophthalmology, Wilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA. 3. Johns Hopkins School of Nursing, Baltimore, Maryland, USA. 4. Dana Center for Preventive Ophthalmology, Wilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine where glaucoma patients most often fall and how integrated visual field (IVF) damage affects falls rates per year (falls/year) and per step (falls/step) at and away from home. DESIGN: Prospective, observational cohort study. METHODS: In 225 patients with glaucoma or suspected glaucoma, falls data were collected via calendars, fall location was classified through follow-up questionnaires, and steps taken at and away from home were judged by integrating data from annual week-long accelerometer and GPS trials. Main outcome measures were the association of IVF sensitivity with fall rates per year or step, stratified by location. RESULTS: Participants took more away steps than home steps (2366 vs 1524, P < .001), and differences in away vs home steps did not vary with IVF sensitivity (P = .22). A total of 57% of falls occurred at home, with each home step twice as likely to result in a fall as compared to each away step (rate ratio = 2.02, P < .001). Worse IVF sensitivity was not associated with a higher rate of home falls/year or away falls/year (P > .1 for both), but was associated with a higher rate of home falls/step (rate ratio = 1.34/5 dB worse sensitivity, P = .03) and away falls/step (rate ratio = 1.47/5 dB worse sensitivity, P = .003). CONCLUSIONS: In this glaucoma population, most falls occurred at home, and the risk of any step resulting in a fall was higher at home. Those with greater VF damage were more likely to fall for each step taken both at and away from home. Efforts such as home environmental modification should be considered in the visually impaired to prevent falls while maintaining physical activity.
OBJECTIVE: To determine where glaucomapatients most often fall and how integrated visual field (IVF) damage affects falls rates per year (falls/year) and per step (falls/step) at and away from home. DESIGN: Prospective, observational cohort study. METHODS: In 225 patients with glaucoma or suspected glaucoma, falls data were collected via calendars, fall location was classified through follow-up questionnaires, and steps taken at and away from home were judged by integrating data from annual week-long accelerometer and GPS trials. Main outcome measures were the association of IVF sensitivity with fall rates per year or step, stratified by location. RESULTS:Participants took more away steps than home steps (2366 vs 1524, P < .001), and differences in away vs home steps did not vary with IVF sensitivity (P = .22). A total of 57% of falls occurred at home, with each home step twice as likely to result in a fall as compared to each away step (rate ratio = 2.02, P < .001). Worse IVF sensitivity was not associated with a higher rate of home falls/year or away falls/year (P > .1 for both), but was associated with a higher rate of home falls/step (rate ratio = 1.34/5 dB worse sensitivity, P = .03) and away falls/step (rate ratio = 1.47/5 dB worse sensitivity, P = .003). CONCLUSIONS: In this glaucoma population, most falls occurred at home, and the risk of any step resulting in a fall was higher at home. Those with greater VF damage were more likely to fall for each step taken both at and away from home. Efforts such as home environmental modification should be considered in the visually impaired to prevent falls while maintaining physical activity.
Authors: Rebecca J Reed-Jones; Guillermina R Solis; Katherine A Lawson; Amanda M Loya; Donna Cude-Islas; Candyce S Berger Journal: Maturitas Date: 2013-02-19 Impact factor: 4.342
Authors: Pradeep Y Ramulu; Eugenio Maul; Chad Hochberg; Emilie S Chan; Luigi Ferrucci; David S Friedman Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2012-03-02 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Pradeep Y Ramulu; Chad Hochberg; Eugenio A Maul; Emilie S Chan; Luigi Ferrucci; David S Friedman Journal: Optom Vis Sci Date: 2014-02 Impact factor: 1.973
Authors: Aleksandra Mihailovic; Bonnielin K Swenor; David S Friedman; Sheila K West; Laura N Gitlin; Pradeep Y Ramulu Journal: Transl Vis Sci Technol Date: 2017-06-23 Impact factor: 3.283
Authors: Jithin Yohannan; Michael Cheng; Joseph Da; Sagar Chapagain; Ayodeji Sotimehin; Luke W Bonham; Aleksandra Mihailovic; Michael Boland; Pradeep Ramulu Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2019-08-29 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Pradeep Y Ramulu; Aleksandra Mihailovic; Jian-Yu E; Rhonda B Miller; Sheila K West; Laura N Gitlin; David S Friedman Journal: Am J Ophthalmol Date: 2021-05-02 Impact factor: 5.488
Authors: Jian-Yu E; Aleksandra Mihailovic; Catalina Garzon; Jennifer A Schrack; Tianjing Li; Sheila K West; David S Friedman; Laura N Gitlin; Pradeep Y Ramulu Journal: Am J Ophthalmol Date: 2021-05-13 Impact factor: 5.488
Authors: Dominic J Grisafe; Rohit Varma; Bruce S Burkemper; Benjamin Y Xu; Mina Torres; Alicia Fairbrother-Crisp; Cecilia M Patino; Roberta McKean-Cowdin Journal: Am J Ophthalmol Date: 2021-02-08 Impact factor: 5.488
Authors: Hursuong Vongsachang; Aleksandra Mihailovic; Jian-Yu E; David S Friedman; Sheila K West; Laura N Gitlin; Pradeep Y Ramulu Journal: Sensors (Basel) Date: 2021-05-14 Impact factor: 3.576
Authors: Anjali M Bhorade; Monica S Perlmutter; Sharon L Sabapathypillai; Manik Goel; Bradley Wilson; Mae O Gordon Journal: Am J Ophthalmol Date: 2021-02-21 Impact factor: 5.488
Authors: Silvia Del Din; Brook Galna; Sue Lord; Alice Nieuwboer; Esther M J Bekkers; Elisa Pelosin; Laura Avanzino; Bastiaan R Bloem; Marcel G M Olde Rikkert; Freek Nieuwhof; Andrea Cereatti; Ugo Della Croce; Anat Mirelman; Jeffrey M Hausdorff; Lynn Rochester Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2020-05-22 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Shrinivas Pundlik; Vilte Baliutaviciute; Mojtaba Moharrer; Alex R Bowers; Gang Luo Journal: Transl Vis Sci Technol Date: 2020-06-11 Impact factor: 3.283