Chuandi Zhou1, Fan Wu1, Peiwei Chai1, Yingyun Shi1, Juan Ye2, Xin Shi2, Jia Tan3, Yi Ding1, Yingxiu Luo1, Bita Esmaeli4, Renbing Jia5, Xianqun Fan6. 1. Department of Ophthalmology, Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai JiaoTong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China; Shanghai Key Laboratory of Orbital Diseases and Ocular Oncology, Shanghai, China. 2. Department of Ophthalmology, The Second Affiliated Hospital Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China. 3. Department of Ophthalmology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan Province, China. 4. Ophthalmic Plastic Surgery, Department of Plastic Surgery, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas. 5. Department of Ophthalmology, Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai JiaoTong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China; Shanghai Key Laboratory of Orbital Diseases and Ocular Oncology, Shanghai, China. Electronic address: renbingjia@sjtu.edu.cn. 6. Department of Ophthalmology, Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai JiaoTong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China; Shanghai Key Laboratory of Orbital Diseases and Ocular Oncology, Shanghai, China. Electronic address: fanxq@sjtu.edu.cn.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The decision to perform Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) or wide local excision (WLE) for eyelid sebaceous carcinoma (SC) is controversial. OBJECTIVE: To compare local recurrence, metastasis, and tumor-related mortality of patients with eyelid SC who were initially treated with MMS versus with WLE. METHODS: A multicenter cohort study. Medical records were reviewed for factors associated with recurrence, metastasis, and tumor-related mortality. All eligible patients were followed up. The impact of initial surgical modality on the prognoses were determined by Cox analyses after control for all confounders. RESULTS: Of the 360 patients included in this cohort, 115 (31.9%) underwent MMS as primary resection, whereas 245 (68.1%) underwent WLE. After a median follow-up period of 60.0 months, local recurrence was observed in 18 patients (15.7%) in the MMS group and 97 patients (39.6%) in the WLE group. Metastasis occurred in 9 patients (7.8%) who underwent MMS and 38 (15.5%) who underwent WLE. In all, 6 patients in the MMS group (5.2%) and 21 in the WLE group (8.6%) died of metastatic SC. Multivariable Cox regression indicated that compared with the WLE group, the MMS group exhibited more favorable local recurrence control (hazard ratio [HR], 0.42; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.24-0.73; P = .002) but a comparable metastasis rate (HR, 1.38; 95% CI, 0.60-3.18; P = .453) and comparable tumor-related mortality (HR, 1.70; 95% CI, 0.59-4.93; P = .329). However, this beneficial effect became nonremarkable for patients with pagetoid intraepithelial neoplasia (HR, 1.73; 95% CI, 0.37-8.21; P = .488). LIMITATIONS: Retrospective nature of the study. CONCLUSION: MMS should be proposed for eyelid SC without orbital involvement to achieve recurrence control; however, this surgical procedure did not change the long-term outcomes in terms of metastasis or tumor-related mortality. Patients with pagetoid intraepithelial neoplasia may require adjuvant measures.
BACKGROUND: The decision to perform Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) or wide local excision (WLE) for eyelid sebaceous carcinoma (SC) is controversial. OBJECTIVE: To compare local recurrence, metastasis, and tumor-related mortality of patients with eyelid SC who were initially treated with MMS versus with WLE. METHODS: A multicenter cohort study. Medical records were reviewed for factors associated with recurrence, metastasis, and tumor-related mortality. All eligible patients were followed up. The impact of initial surgical modality on the prognoses were determined by Cox analyses after control for all confounders. RESULTS: Of the 360 patients included in this cohort, 115 (31.9%) underwent MMS as primary resection, whereas 245 (68.1%) underwent WLE. After a median follow-up period of 60.0 months, local recurrence was observed in 18 patients (15.7%) in the MMS group and 97 patients (39.6%) in the WLE group. Metastasis occurred in 9 patients (7.8%) who underwent MMS and 38 (15.5%) who underwent WLE. In all, 6 patients in the MMS group (5.2%) and 21 in the WLE group (8.6%) died of metastatic SC. Multivariable Cox regression indicated that compared with the WLE group, the MMS group exhibited more favorable local recurrence control (hazard ratio [HR], 0.42; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.24-0.73; P = .002) but a comparable metastasis rate (HR, 1.38; 95% CI, 0.60-3.18; P = .453) and comparable tumor-related mortality (HR, 1.70; 95% CI, 0.59-4.93; P = .329). However, this beneficial effect became nonremarkable for patients with pagetoid intraepithelial neoplasia (HR, 1.73; 95% CI, 0.37-8.21; P = .488). LIMITATIONS: Retrospective nature of the study. CONCLUSION: MMS should be proposed for eyelid SC without orbital involvement to achieve recurrence control; however, this surgical procedure did not change the long-term outcomes in terms of metastasis or tumor-related mortality. Patients with pagetoid intraepithelial neoplasia may require adjuvant measures.
Authors: Puneet Jain; Paul T Finger; Maria Fili; Bertil Damato; Sarah E Coupland; Heinrich Heimann; Nihal Kenawy; Niels J Brouwer; Marina Marinkovic; Sjoerd G Van Duinen; Jean Pierre Caujolle; Celia Maschi; Stefan Seregard; David Pelayes; Martin Folgar; Yacoub A Yousef; Hatem Krema; Brenda Gallie; Alberto Calle-Vasquez Journal: Br J Ophthalmol Date: 2020-09-05 Impact factor: 4.638
Authors: Tiina Leivo; Johanna Sarmela; Maria Enckell-Aaltonen; Eva Dafgård Kopp; Caroline Schmitt; Peter B Toft; Haraldur Sigurdsson; Marita Uusitalo Journal: BMC Ophthalmol Date: 2020-03-16 Impact factor: 2.209