Literature DB >> 30639257

Effect of physicochemical and surface properties on in vivo fate of drug nanocarriers.

Zongmin Zhao1, Anvay Ukidve1, Vinu Krishnan1, Samir Mitragotri2.   

Abstract

Over the years, a plethora of materials - natural and synthetic - have been engineered at a nanoscopic level and explored for drug delivery. Nanocarriers based on such materials could improve the payload's pharmacokinetics and achieve the desired pharmacological response at the target tissue. Despite the development of rationally designed drug nanocarriers, only a handful of such formulations have been successfully translated into the clinic. The physicochemical properties (size, shape, surface chemistry, porosity, elasticity, and many others) of these nanocarriers influence its biological identity, which in presence of biological barriers in vivo, could significantly modulate the therapeutic index of its cargo and alter the desired outcome. Further, complexities associated with developing effective drug nanocarriers have led to conflicting views of its safety, permeation of biological barriers and cellular uptake. Here, in this review, we emphasize the effect of physicochemical properties of nanocarriers on their interactions with the biological milieu. The review will discuss in depth, how modulating the physicochemical properties would influence a drug nanocarrier's behavior in vivo and the mechanisms underlying these effects. The goal of this review is to summarize the design considerations based on these properties and to provide a conceptual template for achieving improved therapeutic efficacy with enhanced patient compliance.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  In vivo; Nanocarrier; Nanomedicine; Nanoparticles; Physicochemical property; Shape; Size; Surface property; Toxicity

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30639257     DOI: 10.1016/j.addr.2019.01.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev        ISSN: 0169-409X            Impact factor:   15.470


  43 in total

1.  Erythrocyte-driven immunization via biomimicry of their natural antigen-presenting function.

Authors:  Anvay Ukidve; Zongmin Zhao; Alexandra Fehnel; Vinu Krishnan; Daniel C Pan; Yongsheng Gao; Abhirup Mandal; Vladimir Muzykantov; Samir Mitragotri
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-07-14       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Tackling TAMs for Cancer Immunotherapy: It's Nano Time.

Authors:  Yishun Yang; Jianfeng Guo; Leaf Huang
Journal:  Trends Pharmacol Sci       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 14.819

3.  Pi-stacking Enhances Stability, Scalability of Formation, Control over Flexibility and Circulation Time of Polymeric Filaments.

Authors:  Sophia Li; Sharan Bobbala; Michael P Vincent; Mallika Modak; Yugang Liu; Evan A Scott
Journal:  Adv Nanobiomed Res       Date:  2021-08-05

Review 4.  Understanding the Phagocytosis of Particles: the Key for Rational Design of Vaccines and Therapeutics.

Authors:  Silvia Moreno-Mendieta; Daniel Guillén; Nathaly Vasquez-Martínez; Rogelio Hernández-Pando; Sergio Sánchez; Romina Rodríguez-Sanoja
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2022-06-23       Impact factor: 4.580

Review 5.  An Updated Review on EPR-Based Solid Tumor Targeting Nanocarriers for Cancer Treatment.

Authors:  Majid Sharifi; William C Cho; Asal Ansariesfahani; Rahil Tarharoudi; Hedyeh Malekisarvar; Soyar Sari; Samir Haj Bloukh; Zehra Edis; Mohamadreza Amin; Jason P Gleghorn; Timo L M Ten Hagen; Mojtaba Falahati
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-10       Impact factor: 6.575

6.  Deep exploration of random forest model boosts the interpretability of machine learning studies of complicated immune responses and lung burden of nanoparticles.

Authors:  Fubo Yu; Changhong Wei; Peng Deng; Ting Peng; Xiangang Hu
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2021-05-26       Impact factor: 14.136

Review 7.  Overcoming biological barriers to improve solid tumor immunotherapy.

Authors:  Anvay Ukidve; Katharina Cu; Ninad Kumbhojkar; Joerg Lahann; Samir Mitragotri
Journal:  Drug Deliv Transl Res       Date:  2021-02-20       Impact factor: 4.617

8.  Size- and Surface- Dual Engineered Small Polyplexes for Efficiently Targeting Delivery of siRNA.

Authors:  Shuang Liu; Shaohui Deng; Xiaoxia Li; Du Cheng
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2021-05-27       Impact factor: 4.411

9.  In vivo targeted delivery of nucleic acids and CRISPR genome editors enabled by GSH-responsive silica nanoparticles.

Authors:  Yuyuan Wang; Pawan K Shahi; Xiuxiu Wang; Ruosen Xie; Yi Zhao; Min Wu; Seth Roge; Bikash R Pattnaik; Shaoqin Gong
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2021-06-23       Impact factor: 11.467

10.  The challenge of using nanotherapy during pregnancy: Technological aspects and biomedical implications.

Authors:  Kelle Velasques Pereira; Renata Giacomeli; Marcelo Gomes de Gomes; Sandra Elisa Haas
Journal:  Placenta       Date:  2020-08-18       Impact factor: 3.481

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.