Literature DB >> 30639155

Subcutaneous expanders and synthetic mesh for breast reconstruction: Long-term and patient-reported BREAST-Q outcomes of a single-center prospective study.

D Casella1, G Di Taranto2, M Marcasciano3, F Lo Torto3, L Barellini1, S Sordi4, I Gaggelli4, M Roncella5, C Calabrese4, D Ribuffo6.   

Abstract

Recently, prepectoral breast reconstruction is experiencing a revival. Despite the growing body of early reports about subcutaneous breast reconstruction, literature lacks in long-term results and studies focusing on patient-reported outcomes and health-related quality of life. Between January 2012 and December 2016, patients undergoing mastectomy were enrolled at our institution. We selected patients diagnosed with breast cancer or genetic predisposition to breast cancer, undergoing conservative mastectomy, either nipple-sparing or skin-sparing mastectomy, and willing for prepectoral tissue expander reconstruction assisted by a synthetic mesh. Exclusion criteria were body mass index greater than 35 kg/m2 and pregnancy. BREAST-Q questionnaire was administered prior to surgery and after 1 year. Capsular contracture was evaluated using Baker scale. Oncological, surgical, and esthetic outcomes along with the changes in BREAST-Q score were analyzed over time. One hundred eighty-seven patients were enrolled, with an average age of 55.5 years. One hundred thirty-seven unilateral mastectomy and 50 bilateral mastectomy procedures were performed, accounting for a total of 237 operated breasts. The average follow-up period after the second stage was 36.5 months. Postoperative complications that require a second operation occurred in 16 cases (6.7%) (4 wound dehiscence, 2 skin-nipple necrosis, 7 infections, and 3 seroma cases). A locoregional recurrence occurred in 3 cases (1.9%) and a systemic recurrence occurred in 2 cases (1.3%). Patients scored high level of satisfaction with outcome. Overall satisfaction with breasts, psychosocial well-being, and sexual well-being was all significantly increased after the surgery (p < 0.05). Two-stage expander reconstruction technique provides the preservation of the pectoralis major muscle with an acceptable rate of complications. We confirm satisfactory patient-reported and esthetic results, with high patient comfort.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BREAST-Q; Muscle sparing reconstruction; Nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM); Prepectoral reconstruction; Subcutaneous breast reconstruction; TiLOOP

Year:  2018        PMID: 30639155     DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2018.12.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg        ISSN: 1748-6815            Impact factor:   2.740


  7 in total

1.  The PreQ-20 TRIAL: A prospective cohort study of the oncologic safety, quality of life and cosmetic outcomes of patients undergoing prepectoral breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Benigno Acea-Nebril; Alejandra García-Novoa; Lourdes García Jiménez
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-07-14       Impact factor: 3.752

2.  Extended Latissimus Dorsi Kite Flap (ELD-K Flap): Revisiting an Old Place for a Total Autologous Breast Reconstruction in Patients with Medium to Large Breasts.

Authors:  Donato Casella; Jacopo Nanni; Federico Lo Torto; Leonardo Barellini; Ugo Redi; Juste Kaciulyte; Dario Cassetti; Diego Ribuffo; Marco Marcasciano
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2020-10-15       Impact factor: 2.326

3.  Prepectoral and Subpectoral Tissue Expander-Based Breast Reconstruction: A Propensity-Matched Analysis of 90-Day Clinical and Health-Related Quality-of-Life Outcomes.

Authors:  Jonas A Nelson; Meghana G Shamsunder; Joshua Vorstenbosch; Thais O Polanco; Evan Matros; Michelle R Coriddi; Babak J Mehrara; Robert J Allen; Joseph H Dayan; Joseph J Disa
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 5.169

4.  Early Clinical Outcomes of Polydioxanone Mesh for Prepectoral Prosthetic Breast Reconstruction.

Authors:  Cecil S Qiu; Akhil K Seth
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2022-01-26

Review 5.  Triple-negative breast cancer: current treatment strategies and factors of negative prognosis.

Authors:  Anna Baranova; Mykola Krasnoselskyi; Volodymyr Starikov; Sergii Kartashov; Igor Zhulkevych; Vadym Vlasenko; Kateryna Oleshko; Olga Bilodid; Marina Sadchikova; Yurii Vinnyk
Journal:  J Med Life       Date:  2022-02

6.  The patient's pathway for breast cancer in the COVID-19 era: An Italian single-center experience.

Authors:  Donato Casella; Daniele Fusario; Dario Cassetti; Simone Miccoli; Anna Lisa Pesce; Andrea Bernini; Marco Marcasciano; Federico Lo Torto; Alessandro Neri
Journal:  Breast J       Date:  2020-06-28       Impact factor: 2.269

7.  The Use of Absorbable Mesh in Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: A 7-Year Review.

Authors:  Heather R Faulkner; Lauren Shikowitz-Behr; Matthew McLeod; Eric Wright; John Hulsen; William G Austen
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 5.169

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.