Literature DB >> 30639015

Hot topic: Selecting cattle for low residual feed intake did not affect daily methane production but increased methane yield.

H E Flay1, B Kuhn-Sherlock1, K A Macdonald1, M Camara1, N Lopez-Villalobos2, D J Donaghy2, J R Roche3.   

Abstract

Reducing enteric methane (CH4) production and improving feed conversion efficiency of dairy cows is of high importance. Residual feed intake (RFI) is one measure of feed efficiency, with low RFI animals being more efficient in feed conversion. Enteric CH4 is an important source of digestible energy loss in ruminants and, because research in beef cattle has reported a positive relationship between RFI and daily CH4 production, we hypothesized that low RFI dairy heifers, which are more feed efficient, would produce less CH4/d. We measured the daily methane production (g of CH4/d), methane yield [g of CH4/kg of dry matter intake (DMI)], and CH4 per kilogram of body weight (BW) gain for 56 heifers (20-22 mo old) in a 2 × 2 factorial arrangement: factors included 2 breeds (Holstein-Friesian and Jersey; n = 28/breed), with equal numbers of animals previously determined as being either high [+2.0 kg of dry matter (DM)/d] or low RFI (-2.1 kg of DM/d; n = 28/RFI category). All heifers were commingled and offered unrestricted access to the same diet of dried alfalfa cubes. Between RFI categories, heifers did not differ in BW or BW gain but low RFI heifers had 9.3 and 10.6% lower DMI and DMI/kg of BW, respectively, than high RFI heifers. Similarly, RFI category did not affect CH4/d or CH4/kg of BWg, but CH4/kg of DMI was higher in low RFI heifers because of their lower DMI. These results might reflect more complete digestion of ingested feed in the more efficient, low RFI heifers, consistent with previous reports of greater apparent digestibility of organic matter. Holstein-Friesian heifers were heavier and consumed more total DM than Jersey heifers, but breed did not affect DMI/kg of BW or BWg. Jersey heifers produced less CH4/d, but not CH4/kg of DMI or CH4/kg of BWg. We detected no interaction between breed and RFI category in any of the variables measured. In conclusion, differences in RFI in dairy heifers did not affect daily CH4 production (g/d); however, low RFI heifers had a greater CH4 yield (g/kg of DMI) on a high forage diet. The Authors. Published by FASS Inc. and Elsevier Inc. on behalf of the American Dairy Science Association®. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Entities:  

Keywords:  environmental sustainability; feed conversion efficiency; greenhouse gas

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30639015     DOI: 10.3168/jds.2018-15234

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dairy Sci        ISSN: 0022-0302            Impact factor:   4.034


  10 in total

1.  Eating Time as a Genetic Indicator of Methane Emissions and Feed Efficiency in Australian Maternal Composite Sheep.

Authors:  Boris J Sepulveda; Stephanie K Muir; Sunduimijid Bolormaa; Matthew I Knight; Ralph Behrendt; Iona M MacLeod; Jennie E Pryce; Hans D Daetwyler
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2022-05-11       Impact factor: 4.772

2.  Methane and Carbon Dioxide Emission of Beef Heifers in Relation with Growth and Feed Efficiency.

Authors:  Gilles Renand; Aurélie Vinet; Virginie Decruyenaere; David Maupetit; Dominique Dozias
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2019-12-12       Impact factor: 2.752

3.  Identification of rumen microbial biomarkers linked to methane emission in Holstein dairy cows.

Authors:  Yuliaxis Ramayo-Caldas; Laura Zingaretti; Milka Popova; Jordi Estellé; Aurelien Bernard; Nicolas Pons; Pau Bellot; Núria Mach; Andrea Rau; Hugo Roume; Miguel Perez-Enciso; Philippe Faverdin; Nadège Edouard; Dusko Ehrlich; Diego P Morgavi; Gilles Renand
Journal:  J Anim Breed Genet       Date:  2019-08-16       Impact factor: 2.380

4.  Residual feed intake divergence during the preweaning period is associated with unique hindgut microbiome and metabolome profiles in neonatal Holstein heifer calves.

Authors:  Ahmed Elolimy; Abdulrahman Alharthi; Mohamed Zeineldin; Claudia Parys; Juan J Loor
Journal:  J Anim Sci Biotechnol       Date:  2020-01-20

5.  Genetic Parameters of Different FTIR-Enabled Phenotyping Tools Derived from Milk Fatty Acid Profile for Reducing Enteric Methane Emissions in Dairy Cattle.

Authors:  Giovanni Bittante; Claudio Cipolat-Gotet; Alessio Cecchinato
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2020-09-15       Impact factor: 2.752

6.  Seasonal Influence on Rumen Microbiota, Rumen Fermentation, and Enteric Methane Emissions of Holstein and Jersey Steers under the Same Total Mixed Ration.

Authors:  Mahfuzul Islam; Seon-Ho Kim; A-Rang Son; Sonny C Ramos; Chang-Dae Jeong; Zhongtang Yu; Seung Ha Kang; Yong-Il Cho; Sung-Sill Lee; Kwang-Keun Cho; Sang-Suk Lee
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-20       Impact factor: 2.752

7.  Holstein and Jersey Steers Differ in Rumen Microbiota and Enteric Methane Emissions Even Fed the Same Total Mixed Ration.

Authors:  Mahfuzul Islam; Seon-Ho Kim; Sonny C Ramos; Lovelia L Mamuad; A-Rang Son; Zhongtang Yu; Sung-Sil Lee; Yong-Il Cho; Sang-Suk Lee
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2021-03-18       Impact factor: 5.640

8.  Phenotypic association among performance, feed efficiency and methane emission traits in Nellore cattle.

Authors:  Leandro Sannomiya Sakamoto; Luana Lelis Souza; Sarah Bernardes Gianvecchio; Matheus Henrique Vargas de Oliveira; Josineudson Augusto Ii de Vasconcelos Silva; Roberta Carrilho Canesin; Renata Helena Branco; Melissa Baccan; Alexandre Berndt; Lucia Galvão de Albuquerque; Maria Eugênia Zerlotti Mercadante
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-10-14       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Enteric methane mitigation interventions.

Authors:  Julia Q Fouts; Mallory C Honan; Breanna M Roque; Juan M Tricarico; Ermias Kebreab
Journal:  Transl Anim Sci       Date:  2022-04-08

10.  Full-lactation performance of multiparous dairy cows with differing residual feed intake.

Authors:  Johanna Karlsson; Rebecca Danielsson; Maria Åkerlind; Kjell Holtenius
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-08-26       Impact factor: 3.752

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.