Rachel Kornhaber1, Denis Visentin2, Deependra Kaji Thapa2, Sancia West2, Josef Haik3, Michelle Cleary4. 1. School of Health Sciences, College of Health and Medicine, University of Tasmania, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel. 2. School of Health Sciences, College of Health and Medicine, University of Tasmania, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia. 3. Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel; Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Israel; Adjunct Professor, School of Health Sciences, University of Tasmania, Sydney, Australia. 4. School of Health Sciences, College of Health and Medicine, University of Tasmania, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia. Electronic address: Michelle.Cleary@utas.edu.au.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Child and adolescent burn survivors benefit from skills to cope with the physical and mental challenges associated with their injuries. Burn camps can offer an opportunity to build these skills. In this study, we systematically review the best available evidence on burn camps in order to better assess their impact on burn survivors. METHOD: A systematic review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A total of 815 articles on recreational therapeutic camps for burn survivors were retrieved from PubMed, PsycINFO, CINAHL and Scopus restricted to the English language and published before or by May 2018. Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) for Qualitative Studies Checklist and the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Critical Appraisal Checklist for non-randomized experimental studies were used to assess the methodological rigour of the quantitative studies. RESULTS: Quantitative data did not support any long-lasting impacts on psychosocial wellbeing. Qualitative data showed children, parents and staff all perceived benefits from camp attendance, including companionship and belonging. CONCLUSION: Further research is required to understand the lack on congruence between qualitative and quantitative data. Qualitative data suggests burn camps are beneficial for children with burn injuries.
OBJECTIVES:Child and adolescent burn survivors benefit from skills to cope with the physical and mental challenges associated with their injuries. Burn camps can offer an opportunity to build these skills. In this study, we systematically review the best available evidence on burn camps in order to better assess their impact on burn survivors. METHOD: A systematic review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A total of 815 articles on recreational therapeutic camps for burn survivors were retrieved from PubMed, PsycINFO, CINAHL and Scopus restricted to the English language and published before or by May 2018. Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) for Qualitative Studies Checklist and the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Critical Appraisal Checklist for non-randomized experimental studies were used to assess the methodological rigour of the quantitative studies. RESULTS: Quantitative data did not support any long-lasting impacts on psychosocial wellbeing. Qualitative data showed children, parents and staff all perceived benefits from camp attendance, including companionship and belonging. CONCLUSION: Further research is required to understand the lack on congruence between qualitative and quantitative data. Qualitative data suggests burn camps are beneficial for children with burn injuries.
Authors: Khushbu F Patel; Silvanys L Rodríguez-Mercedes; Gabrielle G Grant; Camerin A Rencken; Erin M Kinney; Amelia Austen; Carina Hou; Keri J S Brady; Jeffrey C Schneider; Lewis E Kazis; Colleen M Ryan Journal: J Burn Care Res Date: 2022-03-23 Impact factor: 1.819