Literature DB >> 30638490

Comparison of laparoscopic surgery and conventional laparotomy for surgical staging of patients with presumed low-risk endometrial cancer: The current state of Japan.

Imari Deura1, Muneaki Shimada2, Yukihiro Azuma3, Hiroaki Komatsu3, Kei Nagira3, Mayumi Sawada3, Tasuku Harada3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: National health insurance coverage for the laparoscopic staging surgery for patients with stage IA endometrial cancer started from April 2014 in Japan. We conducted this retrospective study to evaluate the surgical outcomes of the laparoscopic surgery for patients with low-risk endometrial cancer compared with those of the laparotomy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 120 patients with presumed low-risk endometrial cancer, who were treated at Tottori University Hospital between 2005 and 2016, were eligible for this study. The laparoscopic staging surgery included only the pelvic lymphadenectomy and not the para-aortic lymphadenectomy. We evaluated the discrepancy between preoperative presumption and postoperative diagnosis of recurrent risk factors.
RESULTS: Forty patients underwent the laparoscopic surgery and 80 patients received the laparotomy. The laparoscopic surgery resulted in less intraoperative blood loss and shorter hospital stay. The operative time was significantly longer for the laparoscopic surgery compared with the laparotomy, but this difference was not seen in obese patients with a body mass index ≥30 kg/m2. The type of the surgical procedure did not affect the incidence of perioperative complications. Among 120 patients, 104 (86.6%) were diagnosed as FIGO stage IA, 118 (98.3%) with endometrioid adenocarcinoma grade 1 or 2, and 107 (89.1%) with myometrial invasion depth <50%.
CONCLUSION: The laparoscopic staging surgery is a feasible and safe alternative to the laparotomy for patients with presumed low-risk endometrial cancer, especially for obese patients. To perform the laparoscopic surgery for patients with stage IA endometrial cancer under the current national health insurance system, it is important to limit the candidates to low-risk disease based on a precise diagnosis before the surgery.
Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Diagnosis; Laparoscopic surgery; Low-risk endometrial cancer; Lymphadenectomy; Obesity

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30638490     DOI: 10.1016/j.tjog.2018.11.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 1028-4559            Impact factor:   1.705


  7 in total

1.  ESGO/ESTRO/ESP Guidelines for the management of patients with endometrial carcinoma.

Authors:  Nicole Concin; Carien L Creutzberg; Ignace Vergote; David Cibula; Mansoor Raza Mirza; Simone Marnitz; Jonathan A Ledermann; Tjalling Bosse; Cyrus Chargari; Anna Fagotti; Christina Fotopoulou; Antonio González-Martín; Sigurd F Lax; Domenica Lorusso; Christian Marth; Philippe Morice; Remi A Nout; Dearbhaile E O'Donnell; Denis Querleu; Maria Rosaria Raspollini; Jalid Sehouli; Alina E Sturdza; Alexandra Taylor; Anneke M Westermann; Pauline Wimberger; Nicoletta Colombo; François Planchamp; Xavier Matias-Guiu
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2021-02       Impact factor: 4.064

Review 2.  The current status of robotic surgery for endometrial cancer in Japan.

Authors:  Tomoko Gota; Kensuke Tomio; Taichi Kurose; Risa Saito; Ryoken Nara; Sohmi Kin; Minami Hoshiba; Yuri Ogata; Misao Nakanishi; Maya Takamoto; Miyuki Sadatsuki; Hajime Oishi
Journal:  Glob Health Med       Date:  2022-02-28

3.  Differential Impact of Systemic Lymphadenectomy Upon the Survival of Patients with Type I vs Type II Endometrial Cancer: A Retrospective Observational Cohort Study.

Authors:  Jie Xu; Can Chen; Jing Xiong; Hua Linghu
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2020-11-30       Impact factor: 3.989

4.  Prognostic significance of peritoneal cytology in low-risk endometrial cancer: comparison of laparoscopic surgery and laparotomy.

Authors:  Satoe Fujiwara; Ruri Nishie; Shoko Ueda; Syunsuke Miyamoto; Shinichi Terada; Yuhei Kogata; Tomohito Tanaka; Yoshimichi Tanaka; Masahide Ohmichi
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2021-01-07       Impact factor: 3.402

5.  Could the Long-Term Oncological Safety of Laparoscopic Surgery in Low-Risk Endometrial Cancer also Be Valid for the High-Intermediate- and High-Risk Patients? A Multi-Center Turkish Gynecologic Oncology Group Study Conducted with 2745 Endometrial Cancer Cases. (TRSGO-End-001).

Authors:  Mehmet Ali Vardar; Ahmet Baris Guzel; Salih Taskin; Mete Gungor; Nejat Ozgul; Coskun Salman; Umran Kucukgoz-Gulec; Ghanim Khatib; Cagatay Taskiran; Ilkkan Dünder; Firat Ortac; Kunter Yuce; Cosan Terek; Tayup Simsek; Aydın Ozsaran; Anil Onan; Gonca Coban; Samet Topuz; Fuat Demirkiran; Ozguc Takmaz; M Faruk Kose; Ahmet Gocmen; Gulsah Seydaoglu; Derya Gumurdulu; Ali Ayhan
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2021-10-29       Impact factor: 3.677

6.  Volume Index is a Risk Factor for Recurrence Even in Patients with Clinical Stage IA Endometrial Cancer Undergoing either Laparotomy or Laparoscopy: A Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Kenro Chikazawa; Sachiho Netsu; Ken Imai; Azusa Kimura; Tomoyuki Kuwata; Ryo Konno
Journal:  Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther       Date:  2022-05-04

7.  Prognosis and Efficacy of Laparoscopic Surgery on Patients with Endometrial Carcinoma: Systematic Evaluation and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Jiong Ma; Chunxia Zhou; Jinyan Chen; Xuejun Chen
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2022-09-22       Impact factor: 2.809

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.