Literature DB >> 30637863

Functional anal canal length measurement using high-resolution anorectal manometry to investigate anal sphincter dysfunction in patients with fecal incontinence or constipation.

Paul F Vollebregt1, Annika M P Rasijeff1, David Pares2, Ugo Grossi1, Emma V Carrington1, Charles H Knowles1, S Mark Scott1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Using high-resolution anorectal manometry, we aimed to evaluate the: (a) optimal threshold to measure functional anal canal length (FACL) with intra- and inter-observer variability; (b) relationship between abnormal FACL and other phenotypic findings; and (c) utility of FACL measurement to discriminate between healthy volunteers (HV) and patients with fecal incontinence (FI) or chronic constipation (CC).
METHODS: Consecutive patients referred for investigation of FI or CC in isolation were included. FACL was calculated at 5, 10, 20, 30, and 50 mm Hg above rectal pressure. 5th-95th percentile in HV defined limits of normality. KEY
RESULTS: FACL was analyzed in 192 patients with FI (154 females), 204 patients with CC (175 females), and 134 HV (101 females). The optimal threshold for measurement of FACL was 20 mm Hg. Using this threshold, observer reproducibility was very high (ICC 0.99, P < 0.0001). FACL was shorter in females with FI and longer in females with CC compared to HV (2.3 vs 2.9 cm; and 3.4 cm vs 2.9 cm; both P < 0.0001). Twenty percent of females and 13% males with FI had a short FACL, associated with older age, anal hypotonia or hypocontractility, and a atrophic internal anal sphincter. However, abnormal FACL in isolation was only found in 1/190 FI (0.5%) and 2/201 CC (1%) patients; all other patients had other abnormal manometric findings. CONCLUSIONS AND INFERENCES: Considering overlap with other routinely evaluated manometric parameters, FACL measurement does not provide additional information in the diagnostic assessment of FI or CC.
© 2019 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  anorectal physiology; chronic constipation; fecal incontinence; high-resolution anorectal manometry

Year:  2019        PMID: 30637863     DOI: 10.1111/nmo.13532

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil        ISSN: 1350-1925            Impact factor:   3.598


  7 in total

1.  Improving the utility of high-resolution manometry for the diagnosis of defecatory disorders in women with chronic constipation.

Authors:  Mayank Sharma; Anjani Muthyala; Kelly Feuerhak; Susrutha Puthanmadhom Narayanan; Kent R Bailey; Adil E Bharucha
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 3.598

Review 2.  Review of the indications, methods, and clinical utility of anorectal manometry and the rectal balloon expulsion test.

Authors:  Adil E Bharucha; Guido Basilisco; Allison Malcolm; Tae Hee Lee; Matthew B Hoy; S Mark Scott; Satish S C Rao
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2022-02-27       Impact factor: 3.960

Review 3.  Understanding the physiology of human defaecation and disorders of continence and evacuation.

Authors:  Paul T Heitmann; Paul F Vollebregt; Charles H Knowles; Peter J Lunniss; Phil G Dinning; S Mark Scott
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2021-08-09       Impact factor: 46.802

4.  Comparison between high-resolution water-perfused anorectal manometry and THD® Anopress anal manometry: a prospective observational study.

Authors:  C A Leo; E Cavazzoni; M M N Leeuwenburgh; G P Thomas; A Dennis; P Bassett; J D Hodgkinson; J Warusavitarne; J Murphy; C J Vaizey
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2020-02-21       Impact factor: 3.788

Review 5.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of anal motor and rectal sensory dysfunction in male and female patients undergoing anorectal manometry for symptoms of faecal incontinence.

Authors:  Annika M P Rasijeff; Karla García-Zermeño; Gian-Luca Di Tanna; José Remes-Troche; Charles H Knowles; Mark S Scott
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2022-01-30       Impact factor: 3.917

6.  Normal values for high-resolution anorectal manometry in healthy young adults: evidence from Vietnam.

Authors:  Le Manh Cuong; Ha Van Quyet; Tran Manh Hung; Nguyen Ngoc Anh; Tran Thu Ha; Vu Van Du; Do Van Loi; Ha Huu Hoang Khai; Vu Duy Kien
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2021-07-15       Impact factor: 3.067

Review 7.  The London Classification: Improving Characterization and Classification of Anorectal Function with Anorectal Manometry.

Authors:  S Mark Scott; Emma V Carrington
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2020-09-15
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.