Literature DB >> 30637843

MRI as a diagnostic biomarker for differentiating primary central nervous system lymphoma from glioblastoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Chong Hyun Suh1, Ho Sung Kim1, Seung Chai Jung1, Ji Eun Park1, Choong Gon Choi1, Sang Joon Kim1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Accurate preoperative differentiation of primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) and glioblastoma is clinically crucial because the treatment strategies differ substantially.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of MRI for differentiating PCNSL from glioblastoma. STUDY TYPE: Systematic review and meta-analysis.
SUBJECTS: Ovid-MEDLINE and EMBASE databases were searched to find relevant original articles up to November 25, 2018. The search term combined synonyms for "lymphoma," "glioblastoma," and "MRI." FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: Patients underwent at least one MRI sequence including diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), dynamic susceptibility-weighted contrast-enhanced imaging (DSC), dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging (DCE), arterial spin labeling (ASL), susceptibility-weighted imaging (SWI), intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM), and magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) using 1.5 or 3 T. ASSESSMENT: Quality assessment was performed according to the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 tool. STATISTICAL TESTS: Hierarchical logistic regression modeling was used to obtain pooled sensitivity and specificity. Meta-regression was performed.
RESULTS: Twenty-two studies with 1182 patients were included. MRI sequences demonstrated high overall diagnostic performance with pooled sensitivity of 91% (95% confidence interval [CI], 87-93%) and specificity of 89% (95% CI, 85-93%). The area under the hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.92 (95% CI, 0.90-0.94). Studies using DSC or ASL showed high diagnostic performance (sensitivity of 93% [95% CI, 89-97%] and specificity of 91% [95% CI, 86-96%]). Heterogeneity was only detected in specificity (I2 = 66.84%) and magnetic field strength was revealed to be a significant factor affecting study heterogeneity. DATA
CONCLUSION: MRI showed overall high diagnostic performance for differentiating PCNSL from glioblastoma, with studies using DSC or ASL showing high diagnostic performance. Therefore, MRI sequences including DSC or ASL is a potential diagnostic tool for differentiating PCNSL from glioblastoma. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 Technical Efficacy Stage: 2 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2019;50:560-572.
© 2019 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  diffusion; glioblastoma; lymphoma; magnetic resonance imaging; perfusion

Year:  2019        PMID: 30637843     DOI: 10.1002/jmri.26602

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 1053-1807            Impact factor:   4.813


  13 in total

Review 1.  Glioblastoma in adults: a Society for Neuro-Oncology (SNO) and European Society of Neuro-Oncology (EANO) consensus review on current management and future directions.

Authors:  Patrick Y Wen; Michael Weller; Eudocia Quant Lee; Brian M Alexander; Jill S Barnholtz-Sloan; Floris P Barthel; Tracy T Batchelor; Ranjit S Bindra; Susan M Chang; E Antonio Chiocca; Timothy F Cloughesy; John F DeGroot; Evanthia Galanis; Mark R Gilbert; Monika E Hegi; Craig Horbinski; Raymond Y Huang; Andrew B Lassman; Emilie Le Rhun; Michael Lim; Minesh P Mehta; Ingo K Mellinghoff; Giuseppe Minniti; David Nathanson; Michael Platten; Matthias Preusser; Patrick Roth; Marc Sanson; David Schiff; Susan C Short; Martin J B Taphoorn; Joerg-Christian Tonn; Jonathan Tsang; Roel G W Verhaak; Andreas von Deimling; Wolfgang Wick; Gelareh Zadeh; David A Reardon; Kenneth D Aldape; Martin J van den Bent
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2020-08-17       Impact factor: 12.300

2.  Interobserver Reliability on Intravoxel Incoherent Motion Imaging in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke.

Authors:  K Yamashita; R Kamei; H Sugimori; T Kuwashiro; S Tokunaga; K Kawamata; K Furuya; S Harada; J Maehara; Y Okada; T Noguchi
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2022-04-21       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  A comparative study of multimodal magnetic resonance in the differential diagnosis of acquired immune deficiency syndrome related primary central nervous system lymphoma and infection.

Authors:  Jingjing Li; Ming Xue; Shuo Yan; Chunshuang Guan; Ruming Xie; Budong Chen
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2021-02-10       Impact factor: 3.090

4.  Deep Learning With Data Enhancement for the Differentiation of Solitary and Multiple Cerebral Glioblastoma, Lymphoma, and Tumefactive Demyelinating Lesion.

Authors:  Yu Zhang; Kewei Liang; Jiaqi He; He Ma; Hongyan Chen; Fei Zheng; Lingling Zhang; Xinsheng Wang; Xibo Ma; Xuzhu Chen
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-08-18       Impact factor: 6.244

5.  Preoperative blood testing for glioblastoma, brain metastases, and primary central nervous system lymphoma differentiation.

Authors:  Song-Quan Wang; Qing Yuan; Guang-Tao Zhang; Hai-Peng Qian; Zhi-Dan Liu; Jia-Wei Wang; Hong-Qing Cai; Jing-Hai Wan
Journal:  Transl Cancer Res       Date:  2022-01       Impact factor: 1.241

6.  Branch-like enhancement on contrast enhanced MRI is a specific finding of cerebellar lymphoma compared with other pathologies.

Authors:  Kota Yokoyama; Jun Oyama; Junichi Tsuchiya; Jun Karakama; Kaoru Tamura; Motoki Inaji; Yoji Tanaka; Daisuke Kobayashi; Taketoshi Maehara; Ukihide Tateishi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-03-04       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Differentiation of primary central nervous system lymphoma from glioblastoma using optical coherence tomography based on attention ResNet.

Authors:  Sanford P C Hsu; Tien-Yu Hsiao; Li-Chieh Pai; Chia-Wei Sun
Journal:  Neurophotonics       Date:  2022-03-23       Impact factor: 4.212

8.  Intravoxel Incoherent Motion Diffusion-Weighted Imaging for Quantitative Differentiation of Breast Tumors: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Jianye Liang; Sihui Zeng; Zhipeng Li; Yanan Kong; Tiebao Meng; Chunyan Zhou; Jieting Chen; YaoPan Wu; Ni He
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2020-10-20       Impact factor: 6.244

9.  Differentiating the lung lesions using Intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted imaging: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jianye Liang; Jing Li; Zhipeng Li; Tiebao Meng; Jieting Chen; Weimei Ma; Shen Chen; Xie Li; Yaopan Wu; Ni He
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2020-08-24       Impact factor: 4.430

Review 10.  Hemodynamic Imaging in Cerebral Diffuse Glioma-Part A: Concept, Differential Diagnosis and Tumor Grading.

Authors:  Lelio Guida; Vittorio Stumpo; Jacopo Bellomo; Christiaan Hendrik Bas van Niftrik; Martina Sebök; Moncef Berhouma; Andrea Bink; Michael Weller; Zsolt Kulcsar; Luca Regli; Jorn Fierstra
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-10       Impact factor: 6.639

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.