Literature DB >> 30637309

The Midterm Results of the Delta Xtend Reverse Shoulder System: A Five-Year Outcome Study.

John G Horneff1,2, Thema A Nicholson1,2, Surena Namdari1,2, Gerald R Williams1,2, Joseph A Abboud1,2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to examine the mid-term functional outcomes, radiographic results, and revision rates of patients treated with the Delta Xtend Reverse Shoulder System for both primary and revision arthroplasty indications.
METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted of records for all individuals who underwent a reverse shoulder arthroplasty using the Delta Xtend Reverse Shoulder Prosthesis at a single institution. Radiographic analysis as well as pain and functional measures using the ASES, Quick DASH, SST, SF-12, Penn, SANE, EQ-5D and VAS, and VR-12 scores. Patients were evaluated for five-year outcomes.
RESULTS: Fifty patients were available for 5-year outcomes. Thirty-three cases were primary arthroplasty cases and 17 were revision arthroplasty cases. Postoperative radiographs at five years out from surgery were available for 46 patients. The mean AGT overall was 32.6mm: 31.7mm the primary cases and 34.8mm for revision cases. Sirveaux scapular notching was: 65.2% (30/46) at Grade 0, 23.9% (11/46) at Grade 1, and 10.9% (5/46) at Grade 2. Overall, 32/46 of stems were in neutral position, 10/46 were in valgus position, and 4/46 were in varus position. There was no significant correlation between stem position and scapular notching. The mean outcome scores for all patients at five years were good to excellent. Two revision patients demonstrated loosening of the humeral stem on radiographs. Nine patients demonstrated calcification of the long head of the triceps tendon.
CONCLUSION: In conclusion, the Delta Xtend Reverse Shoulder System has shown to be a reliable arthroplasty system for patients with CTA or failed prior arthroplasty. Patients are generally quite functional at five years out from their reverse shoulder arthroplasty using this implant. Radiographic measures used to interpret the status of the implant demonstrate that AGT is well maintained and scapular notching is minimal for the majority of cases. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Long term outcome; Outcomes study; Range of motion; Reverse shoulder arthroplasty; Shoulder replacement

Year:  2018        PMID: 30637309      PMCID: PMC6310184     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg        ISSN: 2345-461X


  6 in total

1.  A history of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Evan L Flatow; Alicia K Harrison
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Neer Award 2005: The Grammont reverse shoulder prosthesis: results in cuff tear arthritis, fracture sequelae, and revision arthroplasty.

Authors:  Pascal Boileau; Duncan Watkinson; Armodios M Hatzidakis; Istvan Hovorka
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2006 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.019

3.  [The reverse shoulder arthroplasty Delta Xtend : Mid-term results].

Authors:  S Gruber; C Schoch; M Geyer
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 1.087

4.  Cuff-tear arthropathy.

Authors:  C S Neer; E V Craig; H Fukuda
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1983-12       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  Reverse shoulder arthroplasty in 41 patients with cuff tear arthropathy with a mean follow-up period of 5 years.

Authors:  Nawfal Al-Hadithy; Peter Domos; Mathew D Sewell; Ravi Pandit
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2014-06-02       Impact factor: 3.019

6.  Scapular notching in reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Christophe Lévigne; Pascal Boileau; Luc Favard; Pascal Garaud; Daniel Molé; François Sirveaux; Gilles Walch
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2008-06-16       Impact factor: 3.019

  6 in total
  1 in total

1.  Treating cuff tear arthropathy by reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: do the inclination of the humeral component and the lateral offset of the glenosphere influence the clinical and the radiological outcome?

Authors:  Malte Holschen; Alexandros Kiriazis; Benjamin Bockmann; Tobias L Schulte; Kai-Axel Witt; Jörn Steinbeck
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2021-04-20
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.