Literature DB >> 30636680

Prevalence of myocardial bridging associated with coronary endothelial dysfunction in patients with chest pain and non-obstructive coronary artery disease.

Jaskanwal D S Sara1, Michel T Corban, Megha Prasad, Abhiram Prasad, Rajiv Gulati, Lilach O Lerman, Amir Lerman.   

Abstract

AIMS: Myocardial bridging (MB), characterised by the epicardial coronary vessel diving into the myocardium, is present in up to one third of adults and is associated with angina and acute coronary syndromes. MB is accompanied by altered blood flow mechanics and regional changes in wall sheer stress. The purpose of this study was to determine the association between myocardial bridging and coronary endothelial dysfunction. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Patients presenting with chest pain and found to have non-obstructive CAD (stenosis <40%) on angiography underwent an invasive assessment of epicardial and microvascular endothelial function. Epicardial endothelial function was assessed by measuring the percent change in coronary artery diameter in response to intracoronary infusions of acetylcholine (%ΔCADAch). Epicardial endothelial dysfunction was defined as a %ΔCADAch of <-20%. Microvascular endothelial function was assessed by the percent change in coronary blood flow in response to intracoronary infusions of acetylcholine (%ΔCBFAch), and microvascular endothelial dysfunction was defined as a %ΔCBFAch of <50%. MB was diagnosed angiographically by identifying the characteristic reduction in minimal luminal diameter during systole. Patients were divided into those with and those without MB, and the frequency of epicardial endothelial dysfunction and microvascular endothelial dysfunction was compared between patients with versus those without MB. Between 1993 and 2012, 1,469 patients (mean age 50.4 years, 35% male) underwent coronary angiography and invasive testing of endothelial function. Two hundred and eight (14.2%) patients were found to have MB in the LAD. Patients with any MB had a significantly higher frequency of endothelial dysfunction within the mid and/or distal vessel segment compared to patients without MB (60.1% vs 50.4%, p=0.012). In multivariate analyses, mid and/or distal vessel MB was a significant predictor of mid and/or distal vessel epicardial endothelial dysfunction (OR 1.44, 95% CI: 1.04-2.00, p=0.029) and of microvascular endothelial dysfunction (OR 1.34, 95% CI: 1.00-1.82, p=0.050).
CONCLUSIONS: MB co-localises with epicardial endothelial dysfunction and is significantly associated with microvascular endothelial dysfunction in symptomatic patients with non-obstructive CAD, supporting its potential role as a mechanism for angina in symptomatic patients with MB.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 30636680     DOI: 10.4244/EIJ-D-18-00920

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  EuroIntervention        ISSN: 1774-024X            Impact factor:   6.534


  6 in total

1.  'Here comes the story of the Hurricane': a case report of AL cardiac amyloidosis and myocardial bridging.

Authors:  Luigi Cappannoli; Giuseppe Ciliberti; Attilio Restivo; Pierpaolo Palumbo; Francesco D'Alò; Tommaso Sanna; Filippo Crea; Domenico D'Amario
Journal:  Eur Heart J Case Rep       Date:  2022-05-31

2.  A Challenging Combination: Anomalous Left Anterior Descending Coronary Artery, Myocardial Bridging, and Endothelial Dysfunction.

Authors:  Edward A El-Am; Michel T Corban; Amy W Pollak; Amir Lerman; Naser M Ammash
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2020-04-15

3.  Anxiety Disorders Are Associated With Coronary Endothelial Dysfunction in Women With Chest Pain and Nonobstructive Coronary Artery Disease.

Authors:  Jaskanwal D S Sara; Ali Ahmad; Takumi Toya; Laura Suarez Pardo; Lilach O Lerman; Amir Lerman
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2021-08-28       Impact factor: 5.501

Review 4.  Prevalence of Coronary Microvascular Disease and Coronary Vasospasm in Patients With Nonobstructive Coronary Artery Disease: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Niya Mileva; Sakura Nagumo; Takuya Mizukami; Jeroen Sonck; Colin Berry; Emanuele Gallinoro; Giovanni Monizzi; Alessandro Candreva; Daniel Munhoz; Dobrin Vassilev; Martin Penicka; Emanuele Barbato; Bernard De Bruyne; Carlos Collet
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2022-03-18       Impact factor: 6.106

5.  Myocardial bridging is an independent predictor of positive spasm provocation testing by intracoronary ergonovine injections: a retrospective observational study.

Authors:  Riku Arai; Hiroto Kano; Shinya Suzuki; Hiroaki Semba; Takuto Arita; Naoharu Yagi; Takayuki Otsuka; Shunsuke Matsuno; Minoru Matsuhama; Yuko Kato; Tokuhisa Uejima; Yuji Oikawa; Yasuo Okumura; Junji Yajima; Takeshi Yamashita
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2019-09-27       Impact factor: 2.037

Review 6.  Assessment of Vascular Dysfunction in Patients Without Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease: Why, How, and When.

Authors:  Thomas J Ford; Peter Ong; Udo Sechtem; John Beltrame; Paolo G Camici; Filippo Crea; Juan-Carlos Kaski; C Noel Bairey Merz; Carl J Pepine; Hiroaki Shimokawa; Colin Berry
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2020-08-24       Impact factor: 11.075

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.