Literature DB >> 30636672

The Effectiveness of Leech Therapy in Chronic Low Back Pain.

Christoph-Daniel Hohmann1, Rainer Stange, Nico Steckhan, Sibylle Robens, Thomas Ostermann, Arion Paetow, Andreas Michalsen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Leech therapy has been found to be effective in the treatment of a number of chronic musculoskeletal pain syndromes. Leeches are also often used empirically to treat chronic low back pain, but data from clinical trials have been lacking to date. We therefore conducted the first randomized trial of leech therapy for chronic low back pain.
METHODS: Patients with chronic low back pain were randomized to receive either a single session of local treatment with 4-7 leeches or four weekly sessions of exercise therapy (1 hour each) led by a physical therapist. The primary endpoint was a change in average back pain intensity, as measured using a 100-mm visual analog scale (VAS), after 28 days. Secondary end- points included functional impairment (Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire, Hannover Functional Ability Questionnaire), quality of life (Short-Form Health Questionnaire [SF 36]), pain perception (pain perception scale = Schmerzempfindungsskala [SES]), depressivity (Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale [CES-D]), and analgesic consumption (questionnaire/ diary). Trial visits took place before treatment and on days 28 ± 3 and 56 ± 5 after the start of treatment; the overall duration of the trial was 56 ± 5 days.
RESULTS: The mean low back pain score improved from 61.2 ± 15.6 before treatment to 33.1 ± 22.4 on day 28 in the leech ther- apy group (n = 25) and from 61.6 ± 14.8 to 59.8 ± 16.7 in the exercise therapy group (n = 19) (group difference -25.2; 95% con- fidence interval [-41.0; -9.45]; p = 0.0018). Significant benefits of leech therapy were also found at both time points with respect to physical impairment and function as well as physical quality of life. The patients' expectations from treatment were higher in the leech therapy group but did not significantly affect the findings.
CONCLUSION: A single session of leech therapy is more effective over the short term in lowering the intensity of pain over the short term and in improving physical function and quality of life over the intermediate term (4 weeks and 8 weeks, respectively). The limitations of this trial are the lack of blinding and the small number of patients. Leech therapy appears to be an effective treat- ment for chronic low back pain.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30636672      PMCID: PMC6334223          DOI: 10.3238/arztebl.2018.0785

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int        ISSN: 1866-0452            Impact factor:   5.594


  24 in total

1.  Planning and analyzing adaptive group sequential survival trials.

Authors:  Gernot Wassmer
Journal:  Biom J       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 2.207

2.  Leech therapy for symptomatic relief of cancer pain.

Authors:  Mehmet Emin Kalender; Gazi Comez; Alper Sevinc; Ahmet Dirier; Celalettin Camci
Journal:  Pain Med       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 3.750

3.  Effectiveness of leech therapy in chronic lateral epicondylitis: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Marcus Bäcker; Rainer Lüdtke; Dani Afra; Ozgur Cesur; Jost Langhorst; Matthias Fink; Jürgen Bachmann; Gustav J Dobos; Andreas Michalsen
Journal:  Clin J Pain       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 3.442

4.  Effectiveness of leech therapy in osteoarthritis of the knee: a randomized, controlled trial.

Authors:  Andreas Michalsen; Stefanie Klotz; Rainer Lüdtke; Susanne Moebus; Günther Spahn; Gustav J Dobos
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2003-11-04       Impact factor: 25.391

5.  Protein profiling of the medicinal leech salivary gland secretion by proteomic analytical methods.

Authors:  I P Baskova; L L Zavalova; A V Basanova; S A Moshkovskii; V G Zgoda
Journal:  Biochemistry (Mosc)       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 2.487

6.  Effectiveness of leech therapy in women with symptomatic arthrosis of the first carpometacarpal joint: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Andreas Michalsen; Rainer Lüdtke; Özgür Cesur; Dani Afra; Frauke Musial; Marcus Baecker; Matthias Fink; Gustav J Dobos
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2008-04-14       Impact factor: 6.961

7.  Assessment of leech therapy for knee osteoarthritis: a randomized study.

Authors:  Stefan Andereya; Sven Stanzel; Uwe Maus; Ralf Mueller-Rath; Torsten Mumme; Christian H Siebert; Friedrich Stock; Ulrich Schneider
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 3.717

8.  Historical Article: Hirudo medicinalis: ancient origins of, and trends in the use of medicinal leeches throughout history.

Authors:  I S Whitaker; J Rao; D Izadi; P E Butler
Journal:  Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 1.651

9.  [Measuring disability of patients with low-back pain--validation of a German version of the Roland & Morris disability questionnaire].

Authors:  V Exner; P Keel
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 1.107

10.  Validation and reliability of the German version of the Chronic Pain Grade questionnaire in primary care back pain patients.

Authors:  Bernhard W Klasen; Dirk Hallner; Claudia Schaub; Roland Willburger; Monika Hasenbring
Journal:  Psychosoc Med       Date:  2004-10-14
View more
  6 in total

1.  Proven in Other Diseases.

Authors:  Wolfgang May
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2019-04-12       Impact factor: 5.594

2.  Methodological Limitations of the Study.

Authors:  Mechthild Waldeyer-Sauerland
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2019-04-12       Impact factor: 5.594

3.  Admirable Use of Leeches.

Authors:  Helmut Barz
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2019-04-12       Impact factor: 5.594

4.  In Reply.

Authors:  Andreas Michalsen
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2019-04-12       Impact factor: 5.594

5.  High-Quality Studies in Complementary and Alternative Medicine are Necessary.

Authors:  Jutta Hübner; Oliver Micke; Jens Büntzel
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2019-04-12       Impact factor: 5.594

6.  Clinical outcome analysis in surgical patients enrolled in a Second Opinion Program in spine surgery.

Authors:  Rebeca Barqueiro de Oliveira; Isadora Orlando de Oliveira; Eliane Antonioli; Mario Lenza; Mario Ferretti
Journal:  Einstein (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2022-04-01
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.