Literature DB >> 30636223

Multicentre study of physical abuse and limb fractures in young children in the East Anglia Region, UK.

Piers D Mitchell1, Richard Brown2, Tengyao Wang3, Rajen D Shah3, Richard J Samworth3, Sue Deakin4, Phillip Edge5, Ivan Hudson6, Rachel Hutchinson7, Kuldeep Stohr8, Mark Latimer1, Rajan Natarajan9, Sultan Qasim5, Andreas Rehm8, Anish Sanghrajka7, Elizabeth Tissingh6, Georgina M Wright4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine if the detection of physical abuse in young children with fractures is of uniform high standard in the East Anglia Region of the UK, and whether we can identify areas for improvement in our detection of high-risk groups.
DESIGN: Multicentre retrospective 4-year study.
SETTING: 7 hospitals across the East Anglia Region of Britain (East Anglia Paediatric Physical Abuse and Fractures study). PARTICIPANTS: Age groups and fractures indicated as being at higher risk for physical abuse (all children under 12 months of age, and fractures of humerus and femur in children under 36 months of age). OUTCOME MEASURES: Our criterion for physical abuse was the decision of a multiagency child protection case conference (CPCC).
RESULTS: Probability of CPCC decision of physical abuse was highest in infants, ranging from 50% of fractures sustained in the first month of life (excluding obstetric injuries) to 10% at 12 months of age. Only 46%-86% of infants (under 12 months) with a fracture were assessed by a paediatrician for physical abuse after their fracture. Significant variation in the use of skeletal surveys and in CPCC decision of physical abuse was noted in children attending different hospitals.
CONCLUSIONS: It is a concern that significant variation between hospitals was found in the investigation and detection of physical abuse as confirmed by CPCC decisions. To minimise failure to detect true cases of physical abuse, we recommend that all high-risk children should be assessed by a paediatrician prior to discharge from the emergency department. Our proposed criteria for assessment (where we found probability of CPCC decision of physical abuse was at least 10%) are any child under the age of 12 months with any fracture, under 18 months of age with femur fracture and under 24 months with humeral shaft fracture (not supracondylar). © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  child abuse; child protection; fracture; inflicted injury; musculoskeletal

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30636223     DOI: 10.1136/archdischild-2018-315035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Dis Child        ISSN: 0003-9888            Impact factor:   3.791


  2 in total

1.  The epidemiology of infant shaft fractures of femur or humerus by incidence, birth, accidents, and other causes.

Authors:  Johan von Heideken; Ingemar Thiblin; Ulf Högberg
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2020-12-11       Impact factor: 2.362

Review 2.  Recognition of risk and prevention in safeguarding of children and young people: a mapping review and component analysis of service development interventions aimed at health and social care professionals.

Authors:  Duncan Chambers; Anna Cantrell; Andrew Booth
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2021-11-17       Impact factor: 2.655

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.