Literature DB >> 30636109

The diagnostic performance of ultrasonography and computerized tomography in differentiating superficial from deep lobe parotid tumours.

Ping-Chia Cheng1, Chih-Ming Chang1,2, Chun-Chieh Huang3, Wu-Chia Lo1,4, Tsung-Wei Huang1,5, Po-Wen Cheng1, Li-Jen Liao1,5,6.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To validate and compare ultrasound (US) versus computerized tomography (CT) criteria in the localisation of superficial/deep lobe tumours of the parotid gland. DESIGN AND
SETTING: This was a retrospective study of diagnostic tests performed from January 2008 to June 2017. PARTICIPANTS: We included adult patients who were referred for a neck ultrasonography examination due to parotid tumours, and who subsequently underwent parotid surgery. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: We assessed the location of parotid tumours, comparing the minimum fascia-tumour distance (MFTD) criterion on an US with eight CT criteria. We analysed receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves of the MFTD for malignant, benign, and all parotid tumours, and compared the accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of the optimal MFTD with those of CT anatomical criteria.
RESULTS: A total of 166 parotid tumours were included. The mean (SD) MFTD in superficial lobe tumours was significantly shorter than that of deep lobe tumours (1.2 [0.7] vs 2.8 [1.9] mm, effect size: 1.84; 95% CI, 1.27-2.41). The areas under the ROC curve were 0.63 for malignant tumours and 0.88 for benign tumours. The optimal MFTD cut point was 2.4 mm for the 154 benign parotid tumours, and the accuracy, sensitivity and specificity were 90%, 80% and 91%, respectively. For the 136 benign parotid tumours that underwent CT examination, three criteria had an accuracy of over 90% (FNline, tMasseter and Conn's arc), but the sensitivities were all below 50%.
CONCLUSIONS: Minimum fascia-tumour distance is more feasible for benign tumours than for malignant tumours for the localisation of parotid tumours. For benign parotid tumours, US is enough to guide operations.
© 2019 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  X-Ray; computed tomography; diagnostic imaging; facial paralysis; parotid gland; parotid neoplasms; salivary gland neoplasms; ultrasonography

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30636109     DOI: 10.1111/coa.13289

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Otolaryngol        ISSN: 1749-4478            Impact factor:   2.597


  4 in total

Review 1.  Diagnostic value of various criteria for deep lobe involvement in radiologic studies with parotid mass: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yun Jin Kang; Jin-Hee Cho; Se Hwan Hwang
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2022-08-26       Impact factor: 6.313

2.  Preoperative evaluation and treatment consideration of parotid gland tumors.

Authors:  Katri Aro; Jarkko Korpi; Jussi Tarkkanen; Antti Mäkitie; Timo Atula
Journal:  Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol       Date:  2020-07-20

3.  Ultrasound-guided-fine-needle Aspiration Drainage and Percutaneous Ethanol Injection for Benign Neck Cysts.

Authors:  Li-Jen Liao; Chi-Te Wang; Tsung-Wei Huang; Po-Wen Cheng; Wu-Chia Lo
Journal:  J Med Ultrasound       Date:  2020-08-24

4.  Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) Histogram Analysis in Parotid Gland Tumors: Evaluating a Novel Approach for Differentiation between Benign and Malignant Parotid Lesions Based on Full Histogram Distributions.

Authors:  Tobias Hepp; Wolfgang Wuest; Rafael Heiss; Matthias Stefan May; Markus Kopp; Matthias Wetzl; Christoph Treutlein; Michael Uder; Marco Wiesmueller
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-01
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.