Literature DB >> 30635447

Current Treatment Options in Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Carcinoma.

Katharine E H Thomas1, Brianne A Voros2,3, J Philip Boudreaux2,3, Ramcharan Thiagarajan2,3, Eugene A Woltering2,3, Robert A Ramirez4,3.   

Abstract

Poorly differentiated gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine carcinomas (GEPNECs) are a rare neoplasm with a bleak prognosis. Currently there are little prospective data available for optimal treatment. This review discusses the current available regimens and the future direction for the treatment of GEPNECs. Treatment plans for GEPNECs are often adapted from those devised for small cell lung cancer; however, differences in these malignancies exist, and GEPNECs require their own treatment paradigms. As such, current first-line treatment for GEPNECs is platinum-based chemotherapy with etoposide. Studies show that response rate and overall survival remain comparable between cisplatin and carboplatin versus etoposide and irinotecan; however, prognosis remains poor, and more efficacious therapy is needed to treat this malignancy. Additional first-line and second-line treatment options beyond platinum-based chemotherapy have also been investigated and may offer further treatment options, but again with suboptimal outcomes. Recent U.S. Food and Drug Administration approval of peptide receptor radionuclide therapy in low- and intermediate-grade neuroendocrine tumors may open the door for further research in its usefulness in GEPNECs. Additionally, the availability of checkpoint inhibitors lends promise to the treatment of GEPNECs. This review highlights the lack of large, prospective studies that focus on the treatment of GEPNECs. There is a need for randomized control trials to elucidate optimal treatment regimens specific to this malignancy. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: There are limited data available for the treatment of poorly differentiated gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine carcinomas (GEPNECs) because of the rarity of this malignancy. Much of the treatment regimens used in practice today come from research in small cell lung cancer. Given the poor prognosis of GEPNECs, it is necessary to have treatment paradigms specific to this malignancy. The aim of this literature review is to summarize the available first- and second-line GEPNEC therapy, outline future treatments, and highlight the vast gap in the literature. © AlphaMed Press 2019.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Carcinoma; Current treatment; Neuroendocrine

Year:  2019        PMID: 30635447      PMCID: PMC6693730          DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2018-0604

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncologist        ISSN: 1083-7159


  86 in total

1.  Prospective study of the clinical course, prognostic factors, causes of death, and survival in patients with long-standing Zollinger-Ellison syndrome.

Authors:  F Yu; D J Venzon; J Serrano; S U Goebel; J L Doppman; F Gibril; R T Jensen
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Dosage adjustment and pharmacokinetic profile of irinotecan in cancer patients with hepatic dysfunction.

Authors:  Eric Raymond; Valérie Boige; Sandrine Faivre; Ger-Jan Sanderink; Olivier Rixe; Laurent Vernillet; Christian Jacques; Michel Gatineau; Michel Ducreux; Jean-Pierre Armand
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2002-11-01       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Predictive factors associated with long-term survival in patients with neuroendocrine tumors of the pancreas.

Authors:  Quyen D Chu; Hank C Hill; Harold O Douglass; Deborah Driscoll; Judy L Smith; Hector R Nava; John F Gibbs
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 5.344

4.  Nonfunctioning islet cell carcinoma of the pancreas: survival results in a contemporary series of 163 patients.

Authors:  C C Solorzano; J E Lee; P W Pisters; J N Vauthey; G D Ayers; M E Jean; R F Gagel; J A Ajani; R A Wolff; D B Evans
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.982

5.  Failure to confirm major objective antitumor activity for streptozocin and doxorubicin in the treatment of patients with advanced islet cell carcinoma.

Authors:  P N Cheng; L B Saltz
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1999-09-15       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 6.  Treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer in North America: the emerging role of irinotecan.

Authors:  C J Langer
Journal:  Oncology (Williston Park)       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 2.990

7.  Irinotecan plus cisplatin compared with etoposide plus cisplatin for extensive small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Kazumasa Noda; Yutaka Nishiwaki; Masaaki Kawahara; Shunichi Negoro; Takahiko Sugiura; Akira Yokoyama; Masahiro Fukuoka; Kiyoshi Mori; Koshiro Watanabe; Tomohide Tamura; Seiichiro Yamamoto; Nagahiro Saijo
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-01-10       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Treatment with cisplatin and etoposide in patients with neuroendocrine tumors.

Authors:  M L Fjällskog; D P Granberg; S L Welin; C Eriksson; K E Oberg; E T Janson; B K Eriksson
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2001-09-01       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Efficacy of a chemotherapy combination for the treatment of metastatic neuroendocrine tumours.

Authors:  E Bajetta; L Ferrari; G Procopio; L Catena; E Ferrario; A Martinetti; M Di Bartolomeo; R Buzzoni; L Celio; M Vitali; E Beretta; E Seregni; E Bombardieri
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 32.976

10.  Treatment of poorly differentiated neuroendocrine tumours with etoposide and cisplatin.

Authors:  E Mitry; E Baudin; M Ducreux; J C Sabourin; P Rufié; T Aparicio; T Aparicio; P Lasser; D Elias; P Duvillard; M Schlumberger; P Rougier
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  6 in total

1.  Evaluation of 177Lu-Dotatate treatment in patients with metastatic neuroendocrine tumors and prognostic factors.

Authors:  Estephany Abou Jokh Casas; Virginia Pubul Núñez; Urbano Anido-Herranz; María Del Carmen Mallón Araujo; Maria Del Carmen Pombo Pasín; Miguel Garrido Pumar; José Manuel Cabezas Agrícola; José Manuel Cameselle-Teijeiro; Ashraf Hilal; Álvaro Ruibal Morell
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-04-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 2.  Biomarker Landscape in Neuroendocrine Tumors With High-Grade Features: Current Knowledge and Future Perspective.

Authors:  Michele Prisciandaro; Maria Antista; Alessandra Raimondi; Francesca Corti; Federica Morano; Giovanni Centonze; Giovanna Sabella; Alessandro Mangogna; Giovanni Randon; Filippo Pagani; Natalie Prinzi; Monica Niger; Salvatore Corallo; Erica Castiglioni di Caronno; Marco Massafra; Maria Di Bartolomeo; Filippo de Braud; Massimo Milione; Sara Pusceddu
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-02-04       Impact factor: 6.244

3.  Long-term survival of gastric mixed neuroendocrine-non-neuroendocrine neoplasm: Two case reports.

Authors:  Lun-Tao Woo; Yong-Feng Ding; Chen-Yu Mao; Jiong Qian; Xiu-Ming Zhang; Nong Xu
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2022-08-06       Impact factor: 1.534

4.  Mixed large and small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the stomach: A case report and review of literature.

Authors:  Ze-Feng Li; Hai-Zhen Lu; Ying-Tai Chen; Xiao-Feng Bai; Tong-Bo Wang; He Fei; Dong-Bing Zhao
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2022-06-06       Impact factor: 1.534

Review 5.  Evolving role of seneca valley virus and its biomarker TEM8/ANTXR1 in cancer therapeutics.

Authors:  Virginia Corbett; Paul Hallenbeck; Piotr Rychahou; Aman Chauhan
Journal:  Front Mol Biosci       Date:  2022-08-26

6.  Establishment and validation of a clinicopathological prognosis model of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine carcinomas.

Authors:  Jing Chen; Yibing Liu; Ke Xu; Fei Ren; Bowen Li; Hong Sun
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-09-26       Impact factor: 5.738

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.