Brent R Collett1,2, Erin R Wallace2, Deborah Kartin3, Michael L Cunningham4,5,6, Matthew L Speltz7,2. 1. Center for Child Health, Behavior, and Development and brent.collett@seattlechildrens.org. 2. Departments of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences. 3. Rehabilitation Medicine, and. 4. Center for Developmental Biology and Regenerative Medicine, Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, Washington. 5. Pediatrics, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington; and. 6. Seattle Children's Craniofacial Center, Seattle, Washington. 7. Center for Child Health, Behavior, and Development and.
Abstract
: media-1vid110.1542/5972296741001PEDS-VA_2018-2373Video Abstract BACKGROUND: Studies have revealed an association between positional plagiocephaly and/or brachycephaly (PPB) and development, although little is known about long-term outcomes. We examined cognition and academic achievement in children with and without PPB, testing the hypothesis that children who had PPB as infants would score lower than controls. METHODS: We enrolled 187 school-aged children with a history of PPB and 149 controls. Exposures were the presence or absence and severity of infancy PPB (mild, moderate to severe). Cognitive and academic outcomes were assessed by using the Differential Ability Scales, Second Edition and Wechsler Individual Achievement Test, Third Edition, respectively. RESULTS: Children with PPB scored lower than controls on most scales of the Differential Ability Scales, Second Edition (standardized effect sizes [ESs] = -0.38 to -0.20) and the Wechsler Individual Achievement Test, Third Edition (ESs = -0.22 to -0.17). Analyses by PPB severity revealed meaningful differences among children with moderate to severe PPB (ESs = -0.47 to -0.23 for 8 of 9 outcomes), but few differences in children with mild PPB (ESs = -0.28 to 0.14). CONCLUSIONS: School-aged children with moderate to severe PPB scored lower than controls on cognitive and academic measures; associations were negligible among children with mild PPB. The findings do not necessarily imply that these associations are causal; rather, PPB may serve as a marker of developmental risk. Our findings suggest a role for assessing PPB severity in clinical practice: providing developmental assessment and intervention for infants with more severe deformation and reassurance and anticipatory guidance for patients with mild deformation.
: media-1vid110.1542/5972296741001PEDS-VA_2018-2373Video Abstract BACKGROUND: Studies have revealed an association between positional plagiocephaly and/or brachycephaly (PPB) and development, although little is known about long-term outcomes. We examined cognition and academic achievement in children with and without PPB, testing the hypothesis that children who had PPB as infants would score lower than controls. METHODS: We enrolled 187 school-aged children with a history of PPB and 149 controls. Exposures were the presence or absence and severity of infancy PPB (mild, moderate to severe). Cognitive and academic outcomes were assessed by using the Differential Ability Scales, Second Edition and Wechsler Individual Achievement Test, Third Edition, respectively. RESULTS:Children with PPB scored lower than controls on most scales of the Differential Ability Scales, Second Edition (standardized effect sizes [ESs] = -0.38 to -0.20) and the Wechsler Individual Achievement Test, Third Edition (ESs = -0.22 to -0.17). Analyses by PPB severity revealed meaningful differences among children with moderate to severe PPB (ESs = -0.47 to -0.23 for 8 of 9 outcomes), but few differences in children with mild PPB (ESs = -0.28 to 0.14). CONCLUSIONS: School-aged children with moderate to severe PPB scored lower than controls on cognitive and academic measures; associations were negligible among children with mild PPB. The findings do not necessarily imply that these associations are causal; rather, PPB may serve as a marker of developmental risk. Our findings suggest a role for assessing PPB severity in clinical practice: providing developmental assessment and intervention for infants with more severe deformation and reassurance and anticipatory guidance for patients with mild deformation.
Authors: Brent R Collett; Jacqueline R Starr; Deborah Kartin; Carrie L Heike; Jessica Berg; Michael L Cunningham; Matthew L Speltz Journal: Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med Date: 2011-07
Authors: Brent R Collett; Kristen E Gray; Jacqueline R Starr; Carrie L Heike; Michael L Cunningham; Matthew L Speltz Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2012-12-24 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Catherine E Rice; Kim Van Naarden Braun; Michael D Kogan; Camille Smith; Laura Kavanagh; Bonnie Strickland; Stephen J Blumberg Journal: MMWR Suppl Date: 2014-09-12
Authors: Erin R Wallace; Cindy Ola; Brian G Leroux; Matthew L Speltz; Brent R Collett Journal: Paediatr Child Health Date: 2020-04-17 Impact factor: 2.253
Authors: Jessica F Rohde; Neera K Goyal; Sara R Slovin; Jobayer Hossain; Lee M Pachter; Matthew D Di Guglielmo Journal: J Dev Behav Pediatr Date: 2021 Feb-Mar 01 Impact factor: 2.225
Authors: Eun-Hee Kim; Ki Eun Kim; Jihyun Jeon; Youn Ho Sheen; Hyun-Seung Lee; So Young Yoon; Nam Hyo Kim; Kyoung Min Choi Journal: Front Pediatr Date: 2020-11-11 Impact factor: 3.418
Authors: Iñaki Pastor-Pons; César Hidalgo-García; María Orosia Lucha-López; Marta Barrau-Lalmolda; Iñaki Rodes-Pastor; Ángel Luis Rodríguez-Fernández; José Miguel Tricás-Moreno Journal: Ital J Pediatr Date: 2021-02-25 Impact factor: 2.638
Authors: Petra Santander; Anja Quast; Johanna Hubbert; Laura Juenemann; Sebastian Horn; Kai O Hensel; Philipp Meyer-Marcotty; Jana-Katharina Dieks Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2021-10-27 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Josefa González-Santos; Jerónimo J González-Bernal; Raquel De-la-Fuente Anuncibay; Raúl Soto-Cámara; Esther Cubo; José M Aguilar-Parra; Rubén Trigueros; Remedios López-Liria Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-04-10 Impact factor: 3.390