| Literature DB >> 30635249 |
Chandana Choudhury Barua1, Lipika Buragohain2, Hooriyah Rizavi3, Samir Bikash Gogoi2, Farida Rahman2, Bandi Siva4, K Mounika4, K Suresh Babu4, Debesh Chandra Pathak5, Arabinda Phukan6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Entada phaseoloides is a well-known medicinal plant traditionally used in Ayurvedic medicine for centuries.Entities:
Keywords: Antioxidant enzymes; Endoplasmic reticulum stress; Entada phaseoloides; Imipramine; Oxidative stress
Year: 2019 PMID: 30635249 PMCID: PMC7772487 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaim.2018.02.140
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Ayurveda Integr Med ISSN: 0975-9476
List of Oligonucleotide primer sequences for target genes used in Real Time PCR.
| SL No | Gene of interest | Primer sequences | Accession No | Product size (bp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. | GRP 78 | Forward 5′- GTTTGCTGAGGAAGACAAAAAGCTC-3′ Reverse 5′- CACTTCCATAGAGTTTGCTGATAATTG-3′ | 331 | |
| 2. | GRP 94 | Forward 5′- TGGGTCAAGCAGAAAGGAG-3′ | 212 | |
| 3. | CHOP | Forward 5′- GGAGCTGGAAGCCTGGTATGAGG-3′ | 150 | |
| 4. | Caspase-12 | Forward 5′- GAAGGAATCTGTGGGGTGAA-3′ | 194 | |
| 5. | β-actin | Forward 5′- AGCCATGTACGTAGCCATC-3′ | 228 |
Fig. 1The structures of the most active compounds identified by NMR as followed: Oleic acid (1), Entadamide A (2), Entadamide A-β-d-glucopyranoside (3), 1-O-protocatechuoyl-β-d-glucose (4).
Fig. 2Effect of methanolic extract of Entada phaseoloides (MEEP 100 and 200 mg/kg) and imipramine pre-treatment on force swimming test in mice in ER stress model. Values represent the Mean ± SEM. of six animals for each group. ###p < 0.001, ##p < 0.01, #p < 0.05 compared with vehicle control. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001 compared with chronic restrain group.
Fig. 3Effect of methanolic extract of Entada phaseoloides (MEEP 100 and 200 mg/kg) and of imipramine (10 mg/kg i.p.) pre-treatment on body weight of mice in ER stress. Values represent the Mean ± SEM. of six animals for each group. ###p < 0.001, ##p < 0.01, #p < 0.05 compared with vehicle control. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001 compared with chronic restrain group.
Fig. 4(a–c). Effect of MEEP (100 and 200 mg/kg, p.o.) and Imipramine (10 mg/kg, i.p.) pre-treatment on LPO, GSH and SOD in mice of chronic restrain stress group. Values represent the Mean ± SEM. of six animals for each group. ###p < 0.001, ##p < 0.01, #p < 0.05 compared with vehicle control. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001 compared with chronic restrain group.
Fig. 5(a–d). Quantitative expression of a) GRP 78, b) GRP 94, c) CHOP and d) Caspase-12 genes by Real time PCR in different treatment groups viz. vehicle control, restrain, imipramine, MEEP (100 mg/kg) and MEEP (200 mg/kg) in mice hippocampus with restrain stress. Gene expression was normalized to that of β actin. Values are expressed as fold change represented as Mean ± SEM (n = 3). Statistical significance was determined by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's post hoc test ###p < 0.001 when compared to vehicle control; ***p < 0.001 when compared to restrain group.