Karina Harvie1, Mary Sidebotham2, Jennifer Fenwick3. 1. School of Nursing and Midwifery, Griffith University Logan Campus, University Drive, Meadowbrook, QLD, 4131, Australia; Transforming Maternity Care Collaborative, Griffith University, QLD, 4222, Australia. Electronic address: karina.harvie@gmail.com. 2. School of Nursing and Midwifery, Griffith University Logan Campus, University Drive, Meadowbrook, QLD, 4131, Australia; Transforming Maternity Care Collaborative, Griffith University, QLD, 4222, Australia. Electronic address: m.sidebotham@griffith.edu.au. 3. School of Nursing and Midwifery, Griffith University Logan Campus, University Drive, Meadowbrook, QLD, 4131, Australia; Transforming Maternity Care Collaborative, Griffith University, QLD, 4222, Australia; Gold Coast University Hospital, 1 Hospital Blvd, Southport, QLD, 4215, Australia. Electronic address: j.fenwick@griffith.edu.au.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: There is growing body of evidence that suggests many midwives are unhappy and as a result are making decisions to leave the profession. AIM: Determine the incidence of midwives indicating their intention to leave the profession and explore the reasons for this decision including what might cause midwives to be dissatisfied. METHOD: Data analysed was collected as part of the Australian arm of the Work, Health and Emotional Life of Midwives (WHELM) project. Descriptive statistics and latent content analysis was used to analysis the data set. RESULTS: Almost half (42.8%, n=443/1037) the midwives had considered leaving the profession in the preceding six months. The qualitative and quantitative data aligned with 'dissatisfaction with the organisation of midwifery care' and/or 'dissatisfaction with my role as a midwife' being the two commonest reasons behind the intention to leave. Early career midwives were most likely to consider leaving the profession (p=.05) due to dissatisfaction with their role. Almost half the midwives who had considered leaving the profession were most dissatisfied with managers (p=<.001). CONCLUSION: Midwives felt their ability to provide quality maternity care was constrained by a fragmented medicalised system that did not work for the women in their care or themselves. The results of this study add to a growing call for policy makers and health care providers to reorientate maternity services to enable women to build positive longitudinal relationships with midwives. Not only will this improve maternal and neonatal outcomes but provide a satisfying and sustainable way for working for midwives.
BACKGROUND: There is growing body of evidence that suggests many midwives are unhappy and as a result are making decisions to leave the profession. AIM: Determine the incidence of midwives indicating their intention to leave the profession and explore the reasons for this decision including what might cause midwives to be dissatisfied. METHOD: Data analysed was collected as part of the Australian arm of the Work, Health and Emotional Life of Midwives (WHELM) project. Descriptive statistics and latent content analysis was used to analysis the data set. RESULTS: Almost half (42.8%, n=443/1037) the midwives had considered leaving the profession in the preceding six months. The qualitative and quantitative data aligned with 'dissatisfaction with the organisation of midwifery care' and/or 'dissatisfaction with my role as a midwife' being the two commonest reasons behind the intention to leave. Early career midwives were most likely to consider leaving the profession (p=.05) due to dissatisfaction with their role. Almost half the midwives who had considered leaving the profession were most dissatisfied with managers (p=<.001). CONCLUSION: Midwives felt their ability to provide quality maternity care was constrained by a fragmented medicalised system that did not work for the women in their care or themselves. The results of this study add to a growing call for policy makers and health care providers to reorientate maternity services to enable women to build positive longitudinal relationships with midwives. Not only will this improve maternal and neonatal outcomes but provide a satisfying and sustainable way for working for midwives.
Authors: Virginia M Stulz; Zoe Bradfield; Allison Cummins; Christine Catling; Linda Sweet; Rhona McInnes; Karen McLaughlin; Jan Taylor; Donna Hartz; Athena Sheehan Journal: Women Birth Date: 2021-10-14 Impact factor: 3.349
Authors: Nicolas Paul; Marcus Limprecht-Heusner; Jutta Eichenauer; Christel Scheichenbauer; Till Bärnighausen; Stefan Kohler Journal: Eur J Midwifery Date: 2022-07-29
Authors: Irene Santana-Domínguez; Héctor González-De La Torre; José Verdú-Soriano; Miriam Berenguer-Pérez; Juan José Suárez-Sánchez; Alicia Martín-Martínez Journal: Nurs Open Date: 2022-05-28
Authors: Nora Suleiman-Martos; Luis Albendín-García; José L Gómez-Urquiza; Keyla Vargas-Román; Lucia Ramirez-Baena; Elena Ortega-Campos; Emilia I De La Fuente-Solana Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-01-19 Impact factor: 3.390