| Literature DB >> 30635193 |
Jeremy R Crenshaw1, Kathie A Bernhardt2, Emma Fortune3, Kenton R Kaufman4.
Abstract
Treadmill-induced postural perturbations are a promising tool in assessing and reducing the risk of falls. We evaluated the accuracy with which two treadmills (Simbex ActiveStep® and an AMTI instrumented treadmill) achieved commanded displacements, peak velocities, and average initial accelerations. To do so, we included a range of perturbation magnitudes (20, 30, and 40 cm displacements) applied in unweighted and weighted (body mass = 46-84 kg) conditions. Across treadmills and perturbation magnitudes, absolute errors in displacement (< 0.5 cm) and peak velocity (< 4 cm/s) were small (relative error < 5%). Between-treadmill differences in displacement and peak velocity were marginal (< 3%), regardless of the perturbation magnitude and participant body mass. Observed accelerations were more than 5% smaller than commanded values. The front, but not back, AMTI belt demonstrated less acceleration accuracy than the ActiveStep® (≈ 5% difference). In summary, both treadmills demonstrated a reasonable, consistent level of accuracy in delivering postural perturbations.Entities:
Keywords: Balance; Disturbance; Falls; Stability; Surface translation
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30635193 DOI: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2018.12.017
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Med Eng Phys ISSN: 1350-4533 Impact factor: 2.242