| Literature DB >> 30634505 |
Yang Ding1,2, Rong Zhao3,4, Zhenbo Qin5, Zhong Wu6, Liqiang Wang7,8, Lei Liu9,10, Weijie Lu11,12.
Abstract
The in-situ studies of the corrosion product film on nickel-aluminum bronze are significant for explaining the mechanism of its corrosion resistance. In this paper, the corrosion behavior of nickel-aluminum bronze and the formation process of the protective film in 3.5 wt % NaCl solution are systematically investigated. The results of scanning electron microscope analysis and electrochemical tests indicate that the corrosion resistance of nickel-aluminum bronze is improved due to the formation of the corrosion product film. The change of local electrochemical property on the corrosion product film during the immersion time is evaluated via in-situ scanning vibrating electrode technique, and it reveals the evolution rules of ionic flux in real time. The formation process of the protective film on different phases in nickel-aluminum bronze is observed directly by in-situ atomic force microscopy as height change measurements. The α phases at different locations present different corrosion behaviors, and the lamellar α phase within the α + κIII eutectoid structure gets more serious corrosion attack. The κ phases establish a stable and dense protective film in short time, preventing the corrosion attack effectively. The β' phase, however, suffers the most serious corrosion damage until a protective film is formed after 150 min of immersion.Entities:
Keywords: corrosion product film; in-situ AFM; in-situ SVET; nickel-aluminum bronze
Year: 2019 PMID: 30634505 PMCID: PMC6356769 DOI: 10.3390/ma12020209
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Figure 1Optical micrograph of the microstructure of NAB alloy.
Chemical compositions of each phase in the nickel-aluminum bronze (NAB) alloy (wt %).
| Phase | Cu | Al | Fe | Ni | Mn |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| α | 85.4 | 8.2 | 2.9 | 2.4 | 1.1 |
| β′ | 84.5 | 8.6 | 2.4 | 3.5 | 1.0 |
| κII | 24.1 | 18.4 | 32.8 | 22.8 | 1.8 |
| κIII | 30.6 | 17.9 | 19.2 | 31.2 | 1.1 |
Figure 2Morphology of corrosion product film on the surface of NAB alloy after immersion in 3.5 wt % NaCl solution for varying periods of time: (a,b) 48 h; (c,d) 120 h; (e,f) 240 h.
Figure 3Cross-section morphology of the corrosion product film of NAB alloy after immersion in 3.5 wt % NaCl solution for varying periods of time: (a) 48 h; (b) 120 h; (c) 240 h.
Figure 4EDS elemental maps of corrosion product film on NAB alloy in cross-section: (a) morphology; (b) Cu map; (c) Al map; (d) O map; (e) Cl map.
Figure 5Electrochemical properties of NAB alloy with different immersion time in 3.5 wt % NaCl solution: (a) open circuit potential; (b) potentiodynamic polarization curves; (c) Bode plots with impedance and phase angle; (d) Nyquist plots.
Electrochemical corrosion parameters of specimens after different immersion time in 3.5 wt % NaCl solution.
| Immersion Time | EOCP (V) | Ecorr (V) | icorr (μA/cm2) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Initial | −0.264 | −0.260 | 11.35 |
| 48 h | −0.253 | −0.258 | 5.32 |
| 120 h | −0.248 | −0.255 | 5.04 |
| 240 h | −0.237 | −0.257 | 3.78 |
Figure 6Equivalent circuit model used to fit the Nyquist plots data in Figure 5d.
Electrochemical equivalent circuit parameters by fitting analysis of specimens after different immersion times in 3.5 wt % NaCl solution.
| Immersion Time (h) | Rs (Ω·cm2) | CPEf (μF·cm−2) | nf | Rf (Ω·cm2) | CPEct (μF·cm−2) | nct | Rct (Ω·cm2) | W (Ω·s−1/2) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 7.924 | 163.12 | 0.6761 | 1761 | 121.27 | 0.8043 | 317.6 | 2660 |
| 48 | 9.901 | 620.98 | 0.7693 | 1943 | 187.72 | 0.7614 | 3698 | 5391 |
| 120 | 8.072 | 168.15 | 0.8384 | 6946 | 941.58 | 0.7048 | 10,362 | 6242 |
| 240 | 8.640 | 148.08 | 0.8712 | 11,976 | 1234.8 | 0.6466 | 35,939 | - |
Figure 7In-situ SVET 3D-maps of the ionic currents measured above the scratch in 3.5 wt % NaCl solution with different times: (a) initial; (b) 30 min; (c) 60 min; (d) 90 min; (e) 120 min; and (f) 150 min.
Figure 8Corresponding optical micrographs of the specimen in the in-situ SVET measurement: (a) initial; (b) 30 min; (c) 90 min; (d) 150 min.
Figure 9In-situ topography images of NAB specimen surface after exposure to 3.5 wt % NaCl solution for different times: (a) initial; (b) 30 min; (c) 60 min; (d) 120 min; (e) 150 min; (f) 180 min.
Figure 10In-situ line profiles corresponding to sites 1, 2, 3, and 4 marked in Figure 9, respectively: (a) α phase; (b) α + κIII eutectoid structure; (c) κII phase; (d) β′ phase.