Sujeong Kim1, Teresa A Savage2, Patricia E Hershberger3, Karen Kavanaugh2,4. 1. 1 Department of Nursing, College of Nursing, Seattle University, Seattle, Washington. 2. 2 Department of Women, Children, and Family Health Science, College of Nursing, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois. 3. 3 Department of Health Systems Science, College of Nursing, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois. 4. 4 Department of Nursing Research, Children's Hospital of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
Abstract
Background: End-of-life (EOL) care in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) can vary depending on religious beliefs of health care providers and families as well as the sociocultural environment. Although guidelines exist for EOL care in NICUs, most are based on Western studies, and little is known about such care in Asian countries, which have different religious and social background. Objective: This review synthesized empirical research to reveal the state of the science on infant EOL care in Asian countries. Design: This was an integrative review. Setting/Subjects: Data were collected from studies identified in CINAHL, Embase, PsycINFO, and PubMed. The search was limited to current empirical studies involving infant EOL care in Asian countries and published in English between 2007 and 2016. Results: Of 286 studies initially identified, 11 empirical studies conducted in Hong Kong, India, Israel, Japan, Mongolia, Taiwan, and Turkey were included in the review. Four themes were captured: factors influencing decision making, trends in decision making, practical aspects of EOL care, and health care providers' preparation. In most NICUs, health care providers controlled decisions regarding use of life-sustaining treatment, with parents participating in decision making no more than 60% of the time. Although care decisions were gradually changing from "do everything" for patient survival to a more palliative approach, comfort care at the EOL was chosen no more than 63% of the time. Conclusion: While infant EOL care practice and research vary by country, few articles address these matters in Asia. This integrative review characterizes infant EOL care in Asia and explores cultural influences on such care.
Background: End-of-life (EOL) care in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) can vary depending on religious beliefs of health care providers and families as well as the sociocultural environment. Although guidelines exist for EOL care in NICUs, most are based on Western studies, and little is known about such care in Asian countries, which have different religious and social background. Objective: This review synthesized empirical research to reveal the state of the science on infant EOL care in Asian countries. Design: This was an integrative review. Setting/Subjects: Data were collected from studies identified in CINAHL, Embase, PsycINFO, and PubMed. The search was limited to current empirical studies involving infant EOL care in Asian countries and published in English between 2007 and 2016. Results: Of 286 studies initially identified, 11 empirical studies conducted in Hong Kong, India, Israel, Japan, Mongolia, Taiwan, and Turkey were included in the review. Four themes were captured: factors influencing decision making, trends in decision making, practical aspects of EOL care, and health care providers' preparation. In most NICUs, health care providers controlled decisions regarding use of life-sustaining treatment, with parents participating in decision making no more than 60% of the time. Although care decisions were gradually changing from "do everything" for patient survival to a more palliative approach, comfort care at the EOL was chosen no more than 63% of the time. Conclusion: While infant EOL care practice and research vary by country, few articles address these matters in Asia. This integrative review characterizes infant EOL care in Asia and explores cultural influences on such care.
Authors: A Aranka Akkermans; J M W J Joyce Lamerichs; M J Marcus Schultz; T G V Thomas Cherpanath; J B M Job van Woensel; M Marc van Heerde; A H L C Anton van Kaam; M D Moniek van de Loo; A M Anne Stiggelbout; E M A Ellen Smets; M A Mirjam de Vos Journal: Palliat Med Date: 2021-06-28 Impact factor: 4.762