Şebnem Ataman1, İsmihan Sunar1, Gürkan Yilmaz1, Hatice Bodur2, Kemal Nas3, Fikriye Figen Ayhan4,4, Özgür Akgül5, Ayşen Akinci6, Zuhal Altay7, Murat Birtane8, Derya Soy Buğdayci9, Erhan Çapkin10, Remzi Çevik11, Yeşim Garip Çimen12, M Tuncay Duruöz13, Atilla Halil Elhan14, Gülcan Gürer15, Cahit Kaçar16, Ayhan Kamanli3, Ece Kaptanoğlu17, Taciser Kaya18, Hilal Kocabaş19, Ömer Kuru20, Meltem Alkan Melikoğlu21, Sumru Özel22, Aylin Rezvani23, İlhan Sezer24, Fatma Gül Yurdakul12. 1. Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Division of Rheumatology, Ankara University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey. 2. Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Division of Rheumatology, Yıldırım Beyazıt University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey. 3. Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Division of Rheumatology, Sakarya University School of Medicine, Sakarya, Turkey. 4. Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Uşak University, High School of Health Sciences, Uşak, Turkey. 5. Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Division of Rheumatology, Celal Bayar University School of Medicine, Manisa, Turkey. 6. Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Hacettepe University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey. 7. Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, İnönü University School of Medicine, Malatya, Turkey. 8. Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Trakya University School of Medicine, Edirne, Turkey. 9. Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, İstanbul Training and Research Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey. 10. Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Karadeniz Technical University School of Medicine, Trabzon, Turkey. 11. Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Dicle University School of Medicine, Diyarbakır, Turkey. 12. Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Health Sciences, Ankara Numune Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey. 13. Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Division of Rheumatology, Marmara University School of Medicine, İstanbul, Turkey. 14. Department of Biostatistics, Ankara University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey. 15. Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Division of Rheumatology, Adnan Menderes University School of Medicine, Aydın, Turkey. 16. Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Division of Rheumatology, Akdeniz University School of Medicine, Antalya, Turkey. 17. Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Division of Rheumatology, Cumhuriyet University School of Medicine, Sivas, Turkey. 18. Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Health Sciences, İzmir Bozyaka Training and Research Hospital, İzmir, Turkey. 19. Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Division of Rheumatology, Necmettin Erbakan University Meram School of Medicine, Konya, Turkey. 20. Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Division of Rheumatology, Ondokuz Mayıs University School of Medicine, Samsun, Turkey. 21. Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Division of Rheumatology, Atatürk University School of Medicine, Erzurum, Turkey. 22. Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Hitit University School of Medicine, Çorum, Turkey. 23. Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Bezmiâlem Foundation University, İstanbul, Turkey. 24. Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Health Sciences, Antalya Training and Research Hospital, Antalya, Turkey.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: This study aims to report the assessment of the Turkish League Against Rheumatism (TLAR) expert panel on the compliance and adaptation of the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) 2016 recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in Turkey. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The EULAR 2016 recommendations for the treatment of RA were voted by 27 specialists experienced in this field with regard to participation rate for each recommendation and significance of items. Afterwards, each recommendation was brought forward for discussion and any alteration gaining ≥70% approval was accepted. Also, Turkish version of each item was rearranged. Last version of the recommendations was then revoted to determine the level of agreement. Levels of agreement of the two voting rounds were compared with Wilcoxon signed-rank test. In case of significant difference, the item with higher level of agreement was accepted. In case of no difference, the changed item was selected. RESULTS: Four overarching principles and 12 recommendations were assessed among which three overarching principles and one recommendation were changed. The changed overarching principles emphasized the importance of physical medicine and rehabilitation specialists as well as rheumatologists for the care of RA patients in Turkey. An alteration was made in the eighth recommendation on treatment of active RA patients with unfavorable prognostic indicators after failure of three conventional disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs. Remaining principles were accepted as the same although some alterations were suggested but could not find adequate support to reach significance. CONCLUSION: Expert opinion of the TLAR for the treatment of RA was composed for practices in Turkish rheumatology and/or physical medicine and rehabilitation clinics.
OBJECTIVES: This study aims to report the assessment of the Turkish League Against Rheumatism (TLAR) expert panel on the compliance and adaptation of the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) 2016 recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in Turkey. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The EULAR 2016 recommendations for the treatment of RA were voted by 27 specialists experienced in this field with regard to participation rate for each recommendation and significance of items. Afterwards, each recommendation was brought forward for discussion and any alteration gaining ≥70% approval was accepted. Also, Turkish version of each item was rearranged. Last version of the recommendations was then revoted to determine the level of agreement. Levels of agreement of the two voting rounds were compared with Wilcoxon signed-rank test. In case of significant difference, the item with higher level of agreement was accepted. In case of no difference, the changed item was selected. RESULTS: Four overarching principles and 12 recommendations were assessed among which three overarching principles and one recommendation were changed. The changed overarching principles emphasized the importance of physical medicine and rehabilitation specialists as well as rheumatologists for the care of RA patients in Turkey. An alteration was made in the eighth recommendation on treatment of active RA patients with unfavorable prognostic indicators after failure of three conventional disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs. Remaining principles were accepted as the same although some alterations were suggested but could not find adequate support to reach significance. CONCLUSION: Expert opinion of the TLAR for the treatment of RA was composed for practices in Turkish rheumatology and/or physical medicine and rehabilitation clinics.
Entities:
Keywords:
Disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs; Turkish League Against Rheumatism; management; rheumatoid arthritis; treatment recommendations
Authors: Fiona M McQueen; Nick Benton; David Perry; Jeff Crabbe; Elizabeth Robinson; Sue Yeoman; Lachy McLean; Neal Stewart Journal: Arthritis Rheum Date: 2003-07
Authors: P L C M van Riel; A J Taggart; J Sany; M Gaubitz; H W Nab; R Pedersen; B Freundlich; D MacPeek Journal: Ann Rheum Dis Date: 2006-02-07 Impact factor: 19.103