Literature DB >> 30632155

US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention-Based Physical Activity Recommendations Do Not Improve Fitness in Real-World Settings.

Tasa Seibert1, David B Allen2, Jens C Eickhoff3, Aaron L Carrel2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) promotes school-based strategies to increase physical activity (PA). Implementation feasibility and effect of these interventions on cardiovascular fitness (CVF) is unknown.
METHODS: Forty-nine low-SES schools were randomly assigned to either (1) continue routine PA programs (N = 24 schools, 2399 students) or (2) implement 4 CDC-based PA strategies (N = 25 schools, 2495 students). CVF assessed by PACER (Progressive Aerobic Cardiovascular Endurance Run) was obtained at the beginning and end of the school year. A post-study questionnaire was administered at each school to assess adherence.
RESULTS: Overall, PACER z-scores were not augmented by CDC-based PA strategies. In boys, PACER z-scores increased similarly in both intervention and control schools. In girls, increased mean PACER z-score was greater in control schools (p < .01). Fifty-two percent of intervention school's staff reported inability to implement or sustain 4 CDC-based PA strategies.
CONCLUSIONS: Planned implementation of school-based CDC PA strategies did not increase CVF compared to routine PA programming. Lack of efficacy in girls suggests need for sex-specific targeted strategies. These findings highlight limited efficacy of CDC-based PA recommendations alone in low-SES schools. Schools may require additional support to successfully implement recommendations and meaningfully affect health outcomes.
© 2019, American School Health Association.

Entities:  

Keywords:  children; fitness; physical activity; schools

Year:  2019        PMID: 30632155      PMCID: PMC6347480          DOI: 10.1111/josh.12724

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sch Health        ISSN: 0022-4391            Impact factor:   2.118


  4 in total

Review 1.  School-based physical activity programs for promoting physical activity and fitness in children and adolescents aged 6 to 18.

Authors:  Sarah E Neil-Sztramko; Hilary Caldwell; Maureen Dobbins
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-09-23

2.  Physical fitness disparities among New York City public school youth using standardized methods, 2006-2017.

Authors:  Kevin J Konty; Sophia E Day; Michael Larkin; Hannah R Thompson; Emily M D'Agostino
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-04-09       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Cluster randomised controlled trial to determine the impact of an activity enabling uniform on primary school student's fitness and physical activity: study protocol for the Active WeAR Everyday (AWARE) study.

Authors:  Nicole Nathan; Nicole McCarthy; Alix Hall; Adam Shoesmith; Cassandra Lane; Rebecca Jackson; Rachel Sutherland; Daniel Groombridge; Penny Reeves; James Boyer; Bernadette Duggan; Luke Wolfenden
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-09-22       Impact factor: 3.006

Review 4.  Features of effective staff training programmes within school-based interventions targeting student activity behaviour: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Mairead Ryan; Olivia Alliott; Erika Ikeda; Jian'an Luan; Riikka Hofmann; Esther van Sluijs
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2022-09-24       Impact factor: 8.915

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.