Literature DB >> 30632043

The environmental impacts of financial development in OECD countries: a panel GMM approach.

Fortune Ganda1.   

Abstract

Financial development is often expressed as a private sector initiative earmarked towards motivating economic growth and mitigating poverty. Nonetheless, the need for economic development accompanied by high industrialisation and commercialisation strategies has generated natural environmental effects which have raised enormous concern to green interest groups about whether all the seventeen sustainable development goals will be achieved. This paper investigated the environmental effects of financial development in OECD countries from 2001 to 2012 by employing static models and system GMM analysis. The study utilised foreign direct investments, domestic credit to private sector by banks and domestic credit to private sector as the three proxies of financial development. The effects of these measures of financial development were examined on carbon emissions and greenhouse gases (indicators of environmental quality) and environmental sustainability. In this setting, the findings of the research spotlight that domestic credit to private sector by banks shows a negative and significant relationship with carbon emissions, greenhouse gases and sustainability. Conversely, domestic credit to private sector and economic growth indicates a positive and statistically significant relationship with carbon emissions, greenhouse gases and sustainability. Foreign direct investment is positive and significantly connected with carbon emissions and sustainability but only shows a positive and not significant link with greenhouse gases. The evidence suggested by this analysis adds that the financial system should continue to add more initiatives which consider natural environmental perspectives in their current operations. This present study also confirms the existence of the environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) in carbon emissions (turning point, $109,820), total greenhouse gases (turning point, $74,280) and sustainability (turning point, $112,505). The finding that the turning point of carbon emissions is higher than that of total greenhouse gases indicates why introducing initiatives designed to curb growth of carbon emissions in the respective OECD economies is important.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Carbon emissions; Economic growth; Environmental sustainability; Financial Development; Greenhouse gases

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30632043     DOI: 10.1007/s11356-019-04143-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int        ISSN: 0944-1344            Impact factor:   4.223


  11 in total

1.  Empirics on influencing mechanisms among energy, finance, trade, environment, and economic growth: a heterogeneous dynamic panel data analysis of China.

Authors:  Munir Ahmad; Zhen-Yu Zhao; Muhammad Irfan; Marie Claire Mukeshimana
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2019-03-11       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Financial development and its moderating role in environmental Kuznets curve: evidence from Pakistan.

Authors:  Songsheng Chen; Nyla Saleem; Muhammad Waseem Bari
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2019-05-09       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Trade openness, environmental regulation, and human capital in China: based on ARDL cointegration and Granger causality analysis.

Authors:  Huaide Wen; Jun Dai
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2019-11-22       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  Dynamic causality among urban agglomeration, electricity consumption, construction industry, and economic performance: generalized method of moments approach.

Authors:  Munir Ahmad; Gul Jabeen
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2019-11-28       Impact factor: 4.223

5.  Do technological innovations and financial development improve environmental quality in Egypt?

Authors:  Dalia M Ibrahiem
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2020-01-17       Impact factor: 4.223

6.  Nexus between financial development, energy consumption, income level, and ecological footprint in CEE countries: do human capital and biocapacity matter?

Authors:  Songsheng Chen; Shah Saud; Nyla Saleem; Muhammad Waseem Bari
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2019-09-05       Impact factor: 4.223

7.  The impact of globalization and financial development on environmental quality: evidence from selected countries in the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD).

Authors:  Muhammad Wasif Zafar; Shah Saud; Fujun Hou
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2019-03-21       Impact factor: 4.223

8.  Dynamic linkages among CO2 emissions, human development, financial development, and globalization: empirical evidence based on PMG long-run panel estimation.

Authors:  Zhaohua Wang; Yasir Rasool; Muhammad Mansoor Asghar; Bo Wang
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2019-11-11       Impact factor: 4.223

9.  Investigating the potential role of innovation and clean energy in mitigating the ecological footprint in N11 countries.

Authors:  Menna Sherif; Dalia M Ibrahiem; Khadiga M El-Aasar
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2022-01-12       Impact factor: 5.190

10.  The impact of economic complexity on embodied carbon emission in trade: new empirical evidence from cross-country panel data.

Authors:  Muhammad Qayyum; Yuyuan Yu; Shijie Li
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2021-05-27       Impact factor: 4.223

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.