Literature DB >> 30630982

Factor H interferes with the adhesion of sickle red cells to vascular endothelium: a novel disease-modulating molecule.

Elisabetta Lombardi1, Alessandro Matte2, Antonio M Risitano3, Daniel Ricklin4, John D Lambris5, Denise De Zanet1,6, Sakari T Jokiranta7, Nicola Martinelli2, Cinzia Scambi2, Gianluca Salvagno8, Zeno Bisoffi9,10, Chiara Colato10, Angela Siciliano2, Oscar Bortolami11, Mario Mazzuccato1, Francesco Zorzi2, Luigi De Marco1,12, Lucia De Franceschi13.   

Abstract

Sickle cell disease is an autosomal recessive genetic red cell disorder with a worldwide distribution. Growing evidence suggests a possible involvement of complement activation in the severity of clinical complications of sickle cell disease. In this study we found activation of the alternative complement pathway with microvascular deposition of C5b-9 on skin biopsies from patients with sickle cell disease. There was also deposition of C3b on sickle red cell membranes, which is promoted locally by the exposure of phosphatidylserine. In addition, we showed for the first time a peculiar "stop-and-go" motion of sickle cell red blood cells on tumor factor-α-activated vascular endothelial surfaces. Using the C3b/iC3b binding plasma protein factor Has an inhibitor of C3b cell-cell interactions, we found that factor H and its domains 19-20 prevent the adhesion of sickle red cells to the endothelium, normalizing speed transition times of red cells. We documented that factor H acts by preventing the adhesion of sickle red cells to P-selectin and/or the Mac-1 receptor (CD11b/CD18), supporting the activation of the alternative pathway of complement as an additional mechanism in the pathogenesis of acute sickle cell related vaso-occlusive crises. Our data provide a rationale for further investigation of the potential contribution of factor H and other modulators of the alternative complement pathway with potential implications for the treatment of sickle cell disease. Copyright
© 2019 Ferrata Storti Foundation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30630982      PMCID: PMC6518911          DOI: 10.3324/haematol.2018.198622

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Haematologica        ISSN: 0390-6078            Impact factor:   9.941


Introduction

Sickle cell disease (SCD; OMIM # 603903) is an autosomal recessive genetic red blood cell (RBC) disorder with a worldwide distribution. SCD results from a point mutation (βS, 6V) in codon 6 of the β-globin gene where the insertion of valine in place of glutamic acid leads to the production of a defective form of hemoglobin, termed hemoglobin S (HbS).[1-3] Pathophysiological studies have shown that intravascular sickling in capillaries and small vessels leads to vaso-occlusion and impaired blood flow. Vaso-occlusive events in the microcirculation result from a complex and only partially understood scenario involving interactions between different cell types. These cells include dense, dehydrated sickle cells, reticulocytes, abnormally activated endothelial cells, leukocytes and platelets.[1-4] Plasma factors such as coagulation system cytokines and oxidized pro-inflammatory lipids may also be involved. In addition, cyclic polymerization-depolymerization promotes RBC membrane oxidation and reduces RBC survival in the peripheral circulation.[1,5,6] The resulting increase in free hemoglobin and free heme, a consequence of the saturation of the physiological system and local reduction of nitric oxide bioavailability, leads to a pro-coagulant state with increased risk of thrombotic events.[2,3,7-10] All this evidence indicates that sickle cell vasculopathy is a crucial player in RBC adhesion and in the development of acute vaso-occlusion in SCD patients. Although progress has been made in recent decades in understanding the pathogenesis of SCD, the molecular events involved in these processes are still only partially delineated. Whereas a key role for complement activation has been highlighted in chronic inflammatory processes characterized by hemolysis and inflammatory vasculopathy such as atypical hemolytic uremic syndromes and paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria[11-14] the involvement of complement in SCD has been less extensively explored. Previous studies have revealed: (i) an activation of the alternative complement pathway (AP) in SCD patients; (ii) a reduction in the activating proteases factors B and D, modulating complement activation; (iii) a decrease in the plasma levels of factor H (FH), the major soluble regulator of AP activation; and (iv) increased deposition of the complement opsonin C3b on RBC exposing phosphatidylserine.[15-22] Preliminary data from a mouse model of SCD suggest a possible role for complement activation in the generation of vaso-occlusive crises, as an additional disease mechanism contributing to the severity of acute clinical manifestations related to SCD.[23,24] Because of its potential detrimental effects on host cells, the AP is finely regulated by membrane-bound and soluble regulators. Circulating FH plays a particularly important role, since this regulator not only binds to C3b and prevents the formation of C3b convertases, but it is also able to recognize self-associated molecular patterns such as sialic acid and glycosaminoglycans present on the membranes of most healthy cells.[25-27] Any interference with this recognition process, resulting from either polymorphisms or blocking antibodies against FH, may have severe pathological consequences as described for atypical hemolytic uremic syndromes and other complement-mediated disorders.[28] Here, we found that sickle RBC are characterized by membrane deposition of C3b, which acts as a marker for the activation of the AP on sickle RBC. We sought to determine whether C3b deposition on RBC might possibly stimulate vaso-occlusive crises by favoring cell-cell interactions. Indeed, we now demonstrate for the first time a peculiar ex vivo motion profile (“stop-and-go” behavior) of SCD red cells during their transit on vascular endothelial surfaces, a motion that prolongs their transit on the vascular endothelial surface and promotes the adhesion of sickle RBC. We show that FH and its 19-20 domain,[29,30] which primarily targets C3b, prevent the adhesion of sickle RBC to the endothelium. We further document that FH acts by preventing the adhesion of sickle RBC to P-selectin and/or the receptor Mac-1 (CD11b/CD18). Our data provide a rationale for further investigation of FH and other modulators of the AP as novel disease-modifying molecules with potential implications for the treatment of the clinical manifestations of SCD.

Methods

Study design

We studied SCD subjects (n=29; 26 SS and 3 Sβ0) referred to the Department of Medicine, University of Verona and Azienda Ospedaliera Integrata of Verona (Italy) between January 2012 and January 2017. SCD patients were evaluated at steady state, and none of them had been on either hydroxyurea or a transfusion regimen during the 6 months immediately prior to our analysis. Healthy controls were matched by age, sex and ethnic background. The study was approved by the Ethical Committee of the Azienda Ospedaliera Integrata of Verona (Italy) and informed consent was obtained from patients and healthy controls (ethical approval FGRF13IT). Table 1 shows the demographic characteristics of both the healthy subjects and SCD patients studied. Biochemical and hematologic parameters as well as plasma levels of C3 and C4 were determined according to clinical and laboratory standards at the Laboratory of Medicine, University of Verona and Azienda Ospedaliera Integrata of Verona (Italy). Plasma C5a (EIA Quidel Corp., San Diego, CA, USA), plasma vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) and serum FH (Hycult Biotech, Uden, the Netherlands) were determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays, according to the manufacturers’ protocols.[31]
Table 1.

Demographic, hematologic and biochemical data for healthy subjects and patients with sickle cell disease.

Demographic, hematologic and biochemical data for healthy subjects and patients with sickle cell disease.

Evaluation of C5b-9 complement deposition on fixed skin biopsies

Skin punch biopsies were carried out on the volar surface of the left arm on apparently normal skin. The samples were paraffin-embedded and stained with hematoxylin and eosin before examination; they were also used to estimate the presence of C5b-9 complement deposition within the microvasculature.[32] Details on the immunofluorescent and immunohistochemical staining assays are reported in the Online Supplementary Methods.[32-34]

Measurements of phosphatidylserine-positive and C3d-positive red blood cells

Phosphatidylserine-positive cells were detected as previously reported.[35-37] Details are given in the Online Supplementary Methods.

Red blood cell adhesion assay

The real-time adhesion of RBC collected from healthy and SCD subjects on inactive or activated endothelium [in the absence or presence of tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), respectively] was determined as previously reported[38-40] with or without FH or the FH19-20 or FH68 domains.[41] Details are provided in the Online Supplementary Methods.

Development of an algorithm to determine red blood cell transit and flux trajectory

The algorithm to determine RBC transit and flux trajectory is described in the Online Supplementary Methods.

P-selectin and Mac-1 expression in vitro in vascular endothelial cells

Details on immunoblotting[42] and the cytofluorimetric analysis to determine P-selectin and Mac-1 expression are given in the Online Supplementary Methods.

Statistical analysis

All calculations were performed using the IBM SPSS 20.0 statistical package (IBM Inc., Armonk, NY, USA). The level of aggregation was expressed as median values with the minimum-maximum range and shown by means of either dot or box plots. Data were analyzed with non-parametric tests, the Mann-Whitney U test for unpaired samples and the Wilcoxon signed-rank test for paired samples. A P value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Patients with sickle cell disease show activation of the alternative complement pathway and increased C3d-positive red blood cells

Untreated SCD subjects at steady state were studied. As shown in Table 1, reduced hemoglobin, increased reticulocyte counts and raised levels of plasma lactate dehydrogenase, all signs of chronic hemolytic anemia, were observed. In SCD patients, we also found significant increases of the levels of plasma C-reactive protein and surface vascular cell adhesion molecule-1, indicating the presence of a chronic inflammatory vasculopathy in agreement with previous reports.[2,3,9,43] Serum C3 and C4 levels were similar in healthy and SCD subjects (data not shown); whereas levels of the complement activation fragment C5a were significantly elevated in SCD patients when compared to the levels in healthy individuals (Figure 1A); statistical analyses were performed to exclude the possible contribution of confounding factors such as gender or smoking status. Our finding is consistent with previous reports, and confirms the substantial complement activation in SCD patients, likely via the AP.[15-22]
Figure 1.

The adhesion of C3d-positive sickle red blood cells is prevented by factor H. (A) Plasma samples from healthy controls (AA) and patients with sickle cell disease (SCD) were tested by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (see Methods section); *P<0.05 AA versus SCD; n=10 in each group. (B) Deposition of C5b-9 (orange fluorescence) assessed by immunofluorescent staining involving the abluminal aspect of the microvasculature in apparently normal skin of a patient with SCD (direct immunofluorescence; original magnification x100). Inset. Detail of the vessels showing intense granular deposition of C5b-9; direct immunofluorescence; original magnification: ×400. Nuclei were stained with Prolong Gold antifade reagent with DAPI (blue fluorescence). The image shown is one representative image of 16 others with similar results. Lower panel. The percentage of vessels positive (+) for C5b9 granular deposition in skin biopsies from healthy subjects (AA) and sickle cell patients (SCD). Data are shown as means ± SD **P<0.002 AA versus SCD. (C) Left panel. Representative immunohistochemical image of a normal skin biopsy from a SCD patient showing a small vessel in the superficial dermis (arrow) characterized by co-expression of C5b9 (brown) and CD31 (red); for comparison a C5b9-negative vessel (circle) only decorated with CD31 staining (red) is highlighted. One representative image is shown; all 16 gave similar results (n=16). Right panel. Quantification of C5b9-positive vessels in skin biopsies from healthy subjects (see Online Supplementary Figure S2) and SCD patients. Data are shown as means ± SD; **P<0.01 AA versus SCD. (D) Percentages of C3d+ red blood cells (RBC) in healthy donors (AA) and in sickle cell subjects (n=16 AA; n=16 SCD). The dashed line indicates the threshold of normality, corresponding to C3d+ <0.5% of RBC; *P<0.05 AA versus SCD; **P<0.01 AA versus SCD. (E) Percentages of phosphatidylserine-positive (PS+) RBC in healthy donors (AA) and in sickle cell subjects (n=20 AA; n=32 SCD). The dashed line indicates the threshold of normality, corresponding to PS+ <0.5 % of RBC; **P<0.01 AA versus SCD.

The adhesion of C3d-positive sickle red blood cells is prevented by factor H. (A) Plasma samples from healthy controls (AA) and patients with sickle cell disease (SCD) were tested by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (see Methods section); *P<0.05 AA versus SCD; n=10 in each group. (B) Deposition of C5b-9 (orange fluorescence) assessed by immunofluorescent staining involving the abluminal aspect of the microvasculature in apparently normal skin of a patient with SCD (direct immunofluorescence; original magnification x100). Inset. Detail of the vessels showing intense granular deposition of C5b-9; direct immunofluorescence; original magnification: ×400. Nuclei were stained with Prolong Gold antifade reagent with DAPI (blue fluorescence). The image shown is one representative image of 16 others with similar results. Lower panel. The percentage of vessels positive (+) for C5b9 granular deposition in skin biopsies from healthy subjects (AA) and sickle cell patients (SCD). Data are shown as means ± SD **P<0.002 AA versus SCD. (C) Left panel. Representative immunohistochemical image of a normal skin biopsy from a SCD patient showing a small vessel in the superficial dermis (arrow) characterized by co-expression of C5b9 (brown) and CD31 (red); for comparison a C5b9-negative vessel (circle) only decorated with CD31 staining (red) is highlighted. One representative image is shown; all 16 gave similar results (n=16). Right panel. Quantification of C5b9-positive vessels in skin biopsies from healthy subjects (see Online Supplementary Figure S2) and SCD patients. Data are shown as means ± SD; **P<0.01 AA versus SCD. (D) Percentages of C3d+ red blood cells (RBC) in healthy donors (AA) and in sickle cell subjects (n=16 AA; n=16 SCD). The dashed line indicates the threshold of normality, corresponding to C3d+ <0.5% of RBC; *P<0.05 AA versus SCD; **P<0.01 AA versus SCD. (E) Percentages of phosphatidylserine-positive (PS+) RBC in healthy donors (AA) and in sickle cell subjects (n=20 AA; n=32 SCD). The dashed line indicates the threshold of normality, corresponding to PS+ <0.5 % of RBC; **P<0.01 AA versus SCD. Since studies in atypical hemolytic uremic syndromes have shown that skin biopsy might be a feasible method for documenting AP activation by C5b-9 vascular deposition,[32] we obtained skin biopsies from SCD patients at steady state. We considered skin to be an interesting window of observation in SCD, since (i) it might be involved in the clinical manifestations of SCD, such as leg ulcers; and (ii) it has been widely used in SCD mouse models to functionally characterize the microvasculature.[44-47] As shown in Figure 1B, we observed microvascular intense, focal granular deposition of C5b-9 in small vessels throughout the dermis of SCD patients. This pattern is similar to that reported in skin biopsies from patients with atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome, which is a thrombotic microangiopathy related to complement dysfunction.[32] No deposition of C5b9 was observed in skin from healthy controls (Online Supplementary Figure S1A,B). Co-localization of C59b deposits and CD31+ skin vessels was confirmed by immunohistochemical staining only in the skin biopsies from SCD patients (Figure 1C, Online Supplementary Figure S2A,B). Taken together, our data indicate an activation of the AP in SCD, with possible involvement of complement in SCD vasculopathy and in related cellular adhesion events. To understand whether AP activation occurs directly on sickle RBC, we measured the amounts of circulating RBC carrying C3-derived opsonins by detecting the presence of the common C3d fragment.[11,12] As shown in Figure 1D, higher numbers of C3d+ RBC were found in SCD patients in the steady state than in healthy subjects (representative scatter-plots are shown in Online Supplementary Figure S3). This fraction further increased in a subgroup of SCD patients during acute pain crises (SS steady state 2.5±0.8% versus SS pain crisis: 6.1±0.7% P<0.02; n=10), in agreement with an observation by Mold et al.[18] Since a previous report linked activation of the AP with deposition of C3 opsonins to the exposure of phosphatidylserine on SCD RBC surfaces, we evaluated the percentage of phosphatidylserine-positive RBC in our SCD patients[17] and did indeed find higher percentages of phosphatidylserine-positive RBC in SCD patients than in healthy subjects in agreement with previous studies[35,36] (Figure 1E). In contrast to paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria, in which opsonization leads to rapid lysis of affected RBC.[11,12] the presence of functional membrane regulators on SCD erythrocytes allowed a low level of C3-fragment deposition, which might also be considered as a marker of complement activation on sickle RBC. We, therefore, reasoned that the presence of C3b, iC3b or C3dg may function as a site of adhesion of SCD RBC to activated vascular endothelial surfaces, which may carry ligands for C3 fragments, such as Mac-1 and P-selectin.[48,49] To study this possibility, we used the C3b and iC3b binding plasma protein FH as an inhibitor[25-27] and saw no significant differences in FH serum levels between healthy subjects and SCD patients [AA median: 841 (range 616–1528) μg/mL versus SCD median: 980 (741–1301) μg/mL; P=NS].

Factor H prevents the adhesion of sickle red blood cells to tumor necrosis factor-α-activated vascular endothelium

We performed an ex vivo adhesion assay using TNF-α-activated vascular endothelial cells and monitored, in real time, the adhesion of RBC collected from healthy and SCD subjects to inactive (no TNF-α) or activated endothelium (plus TNF-α) as previously described.[38-40] Consistent with the literature, we observed significantly increased adhesion of SCD RBC to TNF-α-activated endothelium when compared to normal RBC (Figure 2A, Online Supplementary Video S1). We next investigated the effect of FH on the adhesion of healthy or SCD RBC to activated vascular endothelium. The dose-response curve with FH showed a significant reduction in RBC adhesion at concentrations ≥9 nM (Figure 2B). This was more pronounced for SCD RBC than for healthy RBC (Figure 2B). We, therefore, expanded the tests to include a larger number of SCD patients using FH concentrations of 9 or 18 nM; as expected, reduced adhesion of SCD RBC to the vascular endothelium was observed in the presence of either 9 nM or 18 nM FH (Figure 3A). Previous studies have identified two major regions on FH (i.e., domains 6-8 and 19-20) as the putative sites of interaction with cell surface constituents such as glycosaminoglycans; furthermore, domains 19-20 are also responsible for binding to sialic acids or C3d-containing deposits.[29] We, therefore, evaluated whether any of these segments had activity similar to that of full-length FH.
Figure 2.

Adhesion of red blood cells to endothelium activated or not by tumor necrosis factor-α. (A) Adhesion of healthy (AA) or sickle cell disease (SCD) red blood cells (RBC) on immortalized endothelium (EA926.hy) treated or not with tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) under flow conditions (data are expressed as cells/mm2). The data were obtained from six separate comparable experiments. All calculations were performed using the IBM SPSS 20.0 statistical package (IBM Inc., Armonk, NY, USA). The results of the adhesion tests are expressed as median values with the minimum-maximum range and are illustrated by box plots. The data were analyzed with non-parametric tests, the Mann-Whitney U test for unpaired samples and the Wilcoxon signed-rank test for paired samples. A value of P<0.05 is considered statistically significant. (B) Dose-response curve for factor H (FH) in adhesion assays for healthy (AA) or sickle (SCD) RBC. Data were obtained at 6 min flux on endothelium treated with either vehicle or TNF-α. The curves are representative of six separate and independent experiments with similar results.

Figure 3.

Factor H and its 19-20 segment normalized the transit of sickle red blood cells on the tumor necrosis factor-α-activated vascular endothelial surface. (A) Sickle cell adhesion after 6 min of perfusion on activated or non-activated endothelium (±TNF-α) in the presence of FH 9 nM or 18 nM final concentration. The data shown are representative of six other independent assays with similar results. Wilcoxon test: *indicates the corresponding significance. A P value <0.05 is considered statistically significant. Statistical analysis as in Figure 2A. (B) Sickle cell adhesion after 6 min of perfusion on activated or non-activated endothelium (± TNF-α) in the presence of FH and its fragments 19-20 and 6-8 (18 nM final concentration). Data shown are representative of six other independent assays with similar results. A P value <0.05 is considered statistically significant. Statistical analysis as in Figure 2A.

Adhesion of red blood cells to endothelium activated or not by tumor necrosis factor-α. (A) Adhesion of healthy (AA) or sickle cell disease (SCD) red blood cells (RBC) on immortalized endothelium (EA926.hy) treated or not with tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) under flow conditions (data are expressed as cells/mm2). The data were obtained from six separate comparable experiments. All calculations were performed using the IBM SPSS 20.0 statistical package (IBM Inc., Armonk, NY, USA). The results of the adhesion tests are expressed as median values with the minimum-maximum range and are illustrated by box plots. The data were analyzed with non-parametric tests, the Mann-Whitney U test for unpaired samples and the Wilcoxon signed-rank test for paired samples. A value of P<0.05 is considered statistically significant. (B) Dose-response curve for factor H (FH) in adhesion assays for healthy (AA) or sickle (SCD) RBC. Data were obtained at 6 min flux on endothelium treated with either vehicle or TNF-α. The curves are representative of six separate and independent experiments with similar results. Factor H and its 19-20 segment normalized the transit of sickle red blood cells on the tumor necrosis factor-α-activated vascular endothelial surface. (A) Sickle cell adhesion after 6 min of perfusion on activated or non-activated endothelium (±TNF-α) in the presence of FH 9 nM or 18 nM final concentration. The data shown are representative of six other independent assays with similar results. Wilcoxon test: *indicates the corresponding significance. A P value <0.05 is considered statistically significant. Statistical analysis as in Figure 2A. (B) Sickle cell adhesion after 6 min of perfusion on activated or non-activated endothelium (± TNF-α) in the presence of FH and its fragments 19-20 and 6-8 (18 nM final concentration). Data shown are representative of six other independent assays with similar results. A P value <0.05 is considered statistically significant. Statistical analysis as in Figure 2A. Perfusion experiments performed on TNF-α-activated endothelium demonstrated that, like intact FH, FH19-20 (18 nM) strongly prevented the adhesion of sickle RBC to the surface of TNF-α-activated vascular endothelium. Conversely, FH6-8 showed a trend, which did not reach statistical significance, toward a reduction in RBC adhesion (Figure 3B). Our data indicate that FH prevents sickle cell adhesion to the activated endothelium through its interaction with cell-surface sialic acids and C3b/iC3b found on the surface of pathological RBC (Figure 3B).

Factor H and its 19-20 domain normalize the sickle red blood cell trajectory and transverse velocity on tumor necrosis factor-α-activated vascular endothelium

We then developed a new algorithm for RBC to analyze their trajectory and transverse velocity, the velocity component perpendicular to the direction of flow of the RBC during their transit in the flow-chamber. The trajectory of each sickle RBC appeared irregular in space and was not uniform in time, especially when compared to that of healthy RBC (Figure 4A,B). This observation was based on the high transverse displacement and the presence of frequent stop-and-go motion that characterized the sickle RBC transit on the activated vascular endothelium. The transverse velocity is a parameter that is correlated with the disturbed movement of a particle. The path of healthy RBC appeared to be more regular, uniform, and parallel to the flow (Figure 4A, Online Supplementary Video S2). Thus, healthy RBC crossed the field of view more rapidly than did sickle RBC (0.8–1.2 s versus 1.7–2 s, respectively; P<0.05). In the presence of FH, the trajectory of sickle RBC was regularized (Figure 4C), reducing their transverse velocity to 7.71 ± 6.7 μm/s (average decrease of 81.13% versus vehicle-treated sickle RBC). The same behavior appeared in sickle RBC treated only with the FH 19-20 domain (Figure 4D), with the transverse speed being 6.56 ± 5.6 μm/s (an average decrease of 83.94% versus vehicle-treated sickle RBC). When the particle kinematics were quantified (Figure 3E), we found that the absolute value of the instantaneous transverse speed of sickle RBC was 40.86 ± 27.6 μm/s, whereas that of healthy cells was only 5.64 ± 4.9 μm/s (a difference of 86.20%). When healthy cells were compared to either FH- or FH19-20-treated sickle RBC, the absolute values for instantaneous transverse speed decreased significantly, reaching values similar to those observed for healthy RBC.
Figure 4.

Factor H and its 19-20 fragment normalized the “stop-and-go” motion of sickle red blood cells. (A) Trajectory of three representative healthy (AA) red blood cells (RBC) in the field of view: each coordinate indicates their centroid at every consecutive frame (flow direction: x axis). (B) Trajectory of three representative sickle (SCD) RBC, showing the “stop-and-go” motion. (C) Trajectory of three representative sickle RBC treated with fator H (FH) (18 nM). (D) Trajectory of three representative sickle RBC treated with FH 19-20 segment (18 nM). (E) Absolute values for instantaneous transverse speed expressed as mean ± standard deviation (**P<0.01 versus healthy RBC).

Factor H and its 19-20 fragment normalized the “stop-and-go” motion of sickle red blood cells. (A) Trajectory of three representative healthy (AA) red blood cells (RBC) in the field of view: each coordinate indicates their centroid at every consecutive frame (flow direction: x axis). (B) Trajectory of three representative sickle (SCD) RBC, showing the “stop-and-go” motion. (C) Trajectory of three representative sickle RBC treated with fator H (FH) (18 nM). (D) Trajectory of three representative sickle RBC treated with FH 19-20 segment (18 nM). (E) Absolute values for instantaneous transverse speed expressed as mean ± standard deviation (**P<0.01 versus healthy RBC).

Anti-P-selectin and anti-Mac-1 antibodies prevent adhesion of sickle red blood cells to tumor necrosis factor-α-activated vascular endothelial surface

To better understand the binding proteins that may be important for adhesion of C3b/iC3b+ SCD red cells, we then evaluated the effects of anti-P-selectin or anti-Mac-1 antibodies on the adhesion of SCD to TNF-α-activated vascular endothelium. We chose these two molecules for the following reasons: (i) they are both modulated in endothelial cells:[2,50-55] (ii) P-selectin has been reported to bind C3b present on the membranes of circulating cells such as platelets;[56] and (iii) Mac-1 is a well-known receptor for iC3b, and potentially C3dg associated with the cell membrane.[25] In addition, P-selectin has been reported to bind RBC, targeting red cell plasma-membrane sialic acid, whereas the presence of a Mac-1 binding site on RBC membranes is still under investigation.[29,48,51,57] In our model, the expression of P-selectin and Mac-1 was significantly increased on TNF-α-activated vascular endothelium when compared to the expression on vehicle-treated cells (Online Supplementary Figure S4A). Both anti-P-selectin and anti-Mac1 antibodies prevented the adhesion of sickle RBC to the activated vascular endothelium (Figure 5A). Whereas the effect of the anti-P-selectin antibody on RBC adhesion may be mediated through interference with two different targets (i.e., iC3b and/or sialic acid), the interplay between Mac-1 and iC3b deposited on sickle RBC is considered to be more selective.[25,58] The anti-adhesive effect of the anti-Mac-1 antibody was more pronounced than that of the anti-P-selectin antibody, but the difference was not statistically significant. No effect on the adhesion of sickle RBC was documented in the presence of a control antibody (Online Supplementary Figure S4B). Collectively, these findings indicate that C3b/iC3b is deposited on sickle RBC membranes as a new ligand, bridging sickle RBC to the activated vascular endothelial surface through binding to the pro-adhesive molecules P-selectin and/or Mac-1.
Figure 5.

The anti-adhesive effect of factor H involves P-selectin and Mac-1 pro-adhesive molecules. (A) Adhesion of sickle cell disease red blood cells (SCD RBC) after 6 min of perfusion on activated or non-activated endothelium (± TNF-α) pre-coated with either anti-P-selectin antibody or anti-Mac1 (CD11b/CD18) antibody. Data shown are representative of six other independent assays with similar results. Wilcoxon test: *indicates the corresponding significance. Adhesion is expressed as median values with a minimum-maximum range and illustrated by box plots. A value of P<0.05 is considered statistically significant. Statistical analysis as in Figure 2A. (B) Schematic model of the beneficial action of factor H in reducing adhesion of C3-derived opsonins on sickle RBC to the TNF-α-activated vascular endothelium. C3 split-fragments on erythrocytes might favor cell-cell interactions through P-selectin and Mac-1. P-selectin might bind RBC through two different targets, iC3b and/or sialic acid; in contrast, Mac-1 targets only iC3b deposits on sickle RBC as a more selective interaction. FH and FH19-20 segment normalized the transit of sickle RBC across the TNF-α-activated vascular endothelial surface, abolishing the “stop-and-go” behavior of the sickle RBC. This effect positively affected (shortened) the transit time of sickle RBC, thereby reducing the likelihood of the RBC sickling during their transit through the microcirculation AP: alternative complement pathway; SCD: sickle cell disease; PS: phosphatidylserine; FH: factor H.

The anti-adhesive effect of factor H involves P-selectin and Mac-1 pro-adhesive molecules. (A) Adhesion of sickle cell disease red blood cells (SCD RBC) after 6 min of perfusion on activated or non-activated endothelium (± TNF-α) pre-coated with either anti-P-selectin antibody or anti-Mac1 (CD11b/CD18) antibody. Data shown are representative of six other independent assays with similar results. Wilcoxon test: *indicates the corresponding significance. Adhesion is expressed as median values with a minimum-maximum range and illustrated by box plots. A value of P<0.05 is considered statistically significant. Statistical analysis as in Figure 2A. (B) Schematic model of the beneficial action of factor H in reducing adhesion of C3-derived opsonins on sickle RBC to the TNF-α-activated vascular endothelium. C3 split-fragments on erythrocytes might favor cell-cell interactions through P-selectin and Mac-1. P-selectin might bind RBC through two different targets, iC3b and/or sialic acid; in contrast, Mac-1 targets only iC3b deposits on sickle RBC as a more selective interaction. FH and FH19-20 segment normalized the transit of sickle RBC across the TNF-α-activated vascular endothelial surface, abolishing the “stop-and-go” behavior of the sickle RBC. This effect positively affected (shortened) the transit time of sickle RBC, thereby reducing the likelihood of the RBC sickling during their transit through the microcirculation AP: alternative complement pathway; SCD: sickle cell disease; PS: phosphatidylserine; FH: factor H.

Discussion

In this study, we confirmed activation of the AP in SCD and demonstrated, for the first time, cutaneous vascular deposition of C5b-9, supporting the involvement of complement in the microvascular injury associated with SCD. We then showed that activation of the AP results in C3 split-fragments being bound to the sickle RBC surface, thereby contributing to the adhesion of RBC to the inflammatory activated vascular endothelial surface. Notably, decoration of erythrocytes with C3 opsonins was more evident in patients undergoing vaso-occlusive crises, further supporting the involvement of complement in microvascular injury in SCD. Since sickle RBC, in contrast to paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria RBC, still contain the functional complement regulators CD55 and CD59, phosphatidylserine-mediated complement activation may allow for a certain degree of opsonization without inducing hemolysis. This situation would lead to the observed accumulation of C3d-containing opsonins (i.e., C3b, iC3b, C3dg), which have all been associated with cell interactions and signaling functions.[59] Thus, we propose that C3 split-fragments on RBC might favor cell-cell interactions, supporting previous observations of reduced RBC-cell interactions in mice genetically lacking the C3 complement fraction.[51,60] We also demonstrated here that FH prevents the adhesion of sickle RBC and normalizes their trajectory and transverse velocity on TNF-α-activated vascular endothelial surfaces through a mechanism involving P-selectin and/or Mac-1 as pro-adhesion molecule(s). FH binds to C3b/iC3b molecules present on cell surfaces and inhibits the AP. The algorithm developed in the present study allowed us to go further in describing RBC adhesion to the endothelial surface. Indeed, we showed that SCD RBC adhere to endothelial cells with a peculiar dynamic behavior not shown by healthy RBC. The stop-and-go motion of sickle RBC contributes to the irregular trajectory of these cells during their transit on the vascular endothelial surface. This slow and irregular movement clearly affects the speed transition time of sickle RBC when compared to healthy control RBC, possibly contributing to the reduction in blood flow in the microcirculation that generally characterizes the early phase of an acute vaso-occlusive crisis.[1,5,61-63] It is thus conceivable that our flow-based methodology could have a positive impact on monitoring therapy for SCD. Both FH and its FH19-20 segment normalized the transit of sickle RBC across the TNF-α-activated vascular endothelial surface, abolishing the “stop-and-go” behavior of sickle RBC. This effect is of great importance because the transition time of sickle RBC in the microcirculation is critically related to the HbS polymerization time and the generation of dense, dehydrated RBC, which contribute to the development of the acute clinical manifestations of SCD.[1,10] It is important to note that FH appears to exert a non-canonical function in preventing cell adhesion. This complement regulator typically inhibits complement activation via the AP by accelerating the decay of C3 convertases and by mediating the degradation of C3b to iC3b and C3dg via the plasma protease factor I. Since our experiments were performed using purified cells in the absence of plasma or serum, factor I and the components involved in convertase formation cannot have been involved in the observed effects. Rather, FH appears to interfere directly with cell-cell interaction events between sickle RBC and endothelial cells. To further elucidate the mechanism of complement opsonin-mediated adhesion and the role of FH as an anti-adhesive molecule for SCD RBC, we pre-coated vascular endothelial cells with either anti-P-selectin or anti-Mac-1 antibodies. Both surface molecules are expressed on activated vascular endothelial cells and have been associated with opsonin interactions. Mac-1 is well-established as a functionally important receptor for iC3b which contributes to phagocytosis and cell activation. Whereas, the interplay of complement with P-selectin is less well described, several studies have shown interactions between C3b and P-selectin.[56,64,65] We found that the adhesion of sickle RBC could be prevented by either anti-P-selectin or anti-Mac-1 antibody, indicating that both molecules contribute to the adhesion of sickle RBC to the vascular endothelium. In our studies, blocking Mac-1 had a more pronounced effect on adhesion than did impairing P-selectin activity. The beneficial impact of interfering with Mac-1 in SCD has been supported by the reduction of RBC-neutrophil interactions in SCD mice treated with anti-Mac-1 antibody[51] or in Mac-1-deficient SCD mice.[57] Thus, our data indicate that complement is involved in the interaction between sickle RBC and the endothelium, pointing to a new additional mechanism contributing to the biocomplexity of acute events in SCD. Our study therefore has potential implications for the clinical management of SCD. Current treatments in development are focused on the role of selectins in the pathogenesis of SCD. For example, an anti-P-selectin antibody (crizanlizumab) that has been used to treat SCD has been reported to affect the period of time between acute pain crises in SCD patients.[52,66,67] Similarly, the small molecule-based pan-selectin inhibitor, rivipansel, currently undergoing phase III clinical trials, is able to reduce the time required to resolve vaso-occlusive crises with a reduction in opioid treatment.[68] Our findings suggest that targeting complement opsonization and/or opsonin-mediated cell adhesion could provide an alternative strategy. Whereas the use of exogenous full-length FH as a therapeutic tool is associated with some challenges, several smaller variants of the regulator have shown promise in preclinical trials for complement-mediated diseases such as paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria. Given the importance of FH domains 19-20 in interfering with RBC adhesion, mini-FH constructs containing this domain pair may be considered, since they may affect both AP activity and the adhesive function of existing opsonins.[69,70] Alternatively, blocking opsonization itself at the level of C3 activation is also expected to impair complement-mediated adhesion. In conclusion, we have first shown that complement activation on sickle RBC participates in the adhesion of sickle erythrocytes to the TNF-α-activated vascular endothelium (Figure 5B). We then further demonstrated that the FH19-20 segment is as efficient as FH in preventing the adhesion of sickle RBC, and results in normalization of sickle RBC transit across the vascular endothelial surface. We suggest that chronic hemolysis may require high levels of FH to prevent RBC adhesion and entrapment in the microcirculation. Finally, our data indicate that FH might act as a multimodal molecule, preventing the opsonization of sickle RBC with C3 opsonins and targeting the interaction of sickle RBC with the endothelium through the adhesion molecules P-selectin and Mac-1 (Figure 5B). Our findings provide a rationale for considering FH-based inhibitors and other modulators of the AP as potential new therapeutic options in SCD.
  69 in total

1.  Endothelial cell interactions with sickle cell, sickle trait, mechanically injured, and normal erythrocytes under controlled flow.

Authors:  G A Barabino; L V McIntire; S G Eskin; D A Sears; M Udden
Journal:  Blood       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 22.113

2.  Alternative complement pathway activity in sera from patients with sickle cell disease.

Authors:  S M Koethe; J T Casper; G E Rodey
Journal:  Clin Exp Immunol       Date:  1976-01       Impact factor: 4.330

3.  Immunologic defect of the alternate pathway-of-complement activation postsplenectomy: a possible relation between splenectomy and infection.

Authors:  A de Ciutiis; M J Polley; L J Metakis; C M Peterson
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  1978-09       Impact factor: 1.798

4.  Endothelin receptor antagonism prevents hypoxia-induced mortality and morbidity in a mouse model of sickle-cell disease.

Authors:  Nathalie Sabaa; Lucia de Franceschi; Philippe Bonnin; Yves Castier; Giorgio Malpeli; Haythem Debbabi; Ariane Galaup; Micheline Maier-Redelsperger; Sophie Vandermeersch; Aldo Scarpa; Anne Janin; Bernard Levy; Robert Girot; Yves Beuzard; Christophe Leboeuf; Annie Henri; Stéphane Germain; Jean-Claude Dussaule; Pierre-Louis Tharaux
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 14.808

5.  Hepatic Overexpression of Hemopexin Inhibits Inflammation and Vascular Stasis in Murine Models of Sickle Cell Disease.

Authors:  Gregory M Vercellotti; Ping Zhang; Julia Nguyen; Fuad Abdulla; Chunsheng Chen; Phong Nguyen; Carlos Nowotny; Clifford J Steer; Ann Smith; John D Belcher
Journal:  Mol Med       Date:  2016-07-19       Impact factor: 6.354

Review 6.  Management of sickle cell disease: summary of the 2014 evidence-based report by expert panel members.

Authors:  Barbara P Yawn; George R Buchanan; Araba N Afenyi-Annan; Samir K Ballas; Kathryn L Hassell; Andra H James; Lanetta Jordan; Sophie M Lanzkron; Richard Lottenberg; William J Savage; Paula J Tanabe; Russell E Ware; M Hassan Murad; Jonathan C Goldsmith; Eduardo Ortiz; Robinson Fulwood; Ann Horton; Joylene John-Sowah
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2014-09-10       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Crizanlizumab for the Prevention of Pain Crises in Sickle Cell Disease.

Authors:  Kenneth I Ataga; Abdullah Kutlar; Julie Kanter; Darla Liles; Rodolfo Cancado; João Friedrisch; Troy H Guthrie; Jennifer Knight-Madden; Ofelia A Alvarez; Victor R Gordeuk; Sandra Gualandro; Marina P Colella; Wally R Smith; Scott A Rollins; Jonathan W Stocker; Russell P Rother
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2016-12-03       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 8.  Complement in disease: a defence system turning offensive.

Authors:  Daniel Ricklin; Edimara S Reis; John D Lambris
Journal:  Nat Rev Nephrol       Date:  2016-05-23       Impact factor: 28.314

9.  The complement receptor 2/factor H fusion protein TT30 protects paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria erythrocytes from complement-mediated hemolysis and C3 fragment.

Authors:  Antonio M Risitano; Rosario Notaro; Caterina Pascariello; Michela Sica; Luigi del Vecchio; Christopher J Horvath; Masha Fridkis-Hareli; Carmine Selleri; Margaret A Lindorfer; Ronald P Taylor; Lucio Luzzatto; V Michael Holers
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2012-05-10       Impact factor: 22.113

10.  The local complement activation on vascular bed of patients with systemic sclerosis: a hypothesis-generating study.

Authors:  Cinzia Scambi; Sara Ugolini; T Sakari Jokiranta; Lucia De Franceschi; Oscar Bortolami; Valentina La Verde; Patrizia Guarini; Paola Caramaschi; Viviana Ravagnani; Guido Martignoni; Chiara Colato; Serena Pedron; Fabio Benedetti; Marco Sorio; Fabio Poli; Domenico Biasi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-02-06       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  14 in total

Review 1.  Clinical promise of next-generation complement therapeutics.

Authors:  Dimitrios C Mastellos; Daniel Ricklin; John D Lambris
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2019-07-19       Impact factor: 84.694

2.  Factor H: a novel modulator in sickle cell disease.

Authors:  Wassim El Nemer; Bérengère Koehl
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 9.941

3.  Complement Component C5 and TLR Molecule CD14 Mediate Heme-Induced Thromboinflammation in Human Blood.

Authors:  Anub M Thomas; Alexandra Gerogianni; Martin B McAdam; Yngvar Fløisand; Corinna Lau; Terje Espevik; Per H Nilsson; Tom Eirik Mollnes; Andreas Barratt-Due
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2019-08-14       Impact factor: 5.422

4.  The Benefits of Complement Measurements for the Clinical Practice.

Authors:  Anne Grunenwald; Lubka T Roumenina
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2021

5.  Atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome: Unique clinical presentation linked to rare CFHR5 mutation.

Authors:  Sofia Menotti; Martino Donini; Giuseppina Pessolano; Livia Tiro; Maurizio Cantini; Jacopo Croce; Matteo Morandi; Filippo Mazzi; Katia Donadello; Oliviero Olivieri; Francesco Dima; Sergio De Marchi; Giovanni Gambaro; Enrico Polati; Lucia De Franceschi
Journal:  EJHaem       Date:  2021-09-14

Review 6.  Acute haemolysis by cold antibody during SARS-CoV-2 infection in a patient with Evans syndrome: a case report and literature review.

Authors:  Nicola Osti; Jacopo Ceolan; Pierluigi Piccoli; Filippo Mazzi; Rachele Montemezzi; Francesco Dima; Simonetta Friso; Francesca Pizzolo; Nicola Martinelli; Monica Rizzi; Sara Moruzzi; Oliviero Olivieri; Lucia De Franceschi
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2021-08-06       Impact factor: 3.443

7.  ADAMTS13 and von Willebrand factor assessment in steady state and acute vaso-occlusive crisis of sickle cell disease.

Authors:  Julien Demagny; Aurélie Driss; Alain Stepanian; Nadia Anguel; Louis Affo; Damien Roux; Anoosha Habibi; Sandrine Benghezal; Sophie Capdenat; Paul Coppo; Françoise Driss; Agnès Veyradier
Journal:  Res Pract Thromb Haemost       Date:  2020-12-18

Review 8.  Multiple inducers of endothelial NOS (eNOS) dysfunction in sickle cell disease.

Authors:  Robert P Hebbel; Gregory M Vercellotti
Journal:  Am J Hematol       Date:  2021-08-23       Impact factor: 13.265

Review 9.  The Red Blood Cell-Inflammation Vicious Circle in Sickle Cell Disease.

Authors:  Elie Nader; Marc Romana; Philippe Connes
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2020-03-13       Impact factor: 7.561

10.  Circulating FH Protects Kidneys From Tubular Injury During Systemic Hemolysis.

Authors:  Nicolas S Merle; Juliette Leon; Victoria Poillerat; Anne Grunenwald; Idris Boudhabhay; Samantha Knockaert; Tania Robe-Rybkine; Carine Torset; Matthew C Pickering; Sophie Chauvet; Veronique Fremeaux-Bacchi; Lubka T Roumenina
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2020-08-07       Impact factor: 7.561

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.