Literature DB >> 30630862

Azacitidine maintenance after intensive chemotherapy improves DFS in older AML patients.

Gerwin Huls1, Dana A Chitu2, Violaine Havelange3, Mojca Jongen-Lavrencic4, Arjan A van de Loosdrecht5, Bart J Biemond6, Harm Sinnige7, Beata Hodossy8, Carlos Graux9, Rien van Marwijk Kooy10, Okke de Weerdt11, Dimitri Breems12, Saskia Klein13, Jürgen Kuball14, Dries Deeren15, Wim Terpstra16, Marie-Christiane Vekemans3, Gert J Ossenkoppele5, Edo Vellenga1, Bob Löwenberg4.   

Abstract

The prevention of relapse is the major therapeutic challenge in older patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) who have obtained a complete remission (CR) on intensive chemotherapy. In this randomized phase 3 study (HOVON97) in older patients (≥60 years) with AML or myelodysplastic syndrome with refractory anemia with excess of blasts, in CR/CR with incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi) after at least 2 cycles of intensive chemotherapy, we assessed the value of azacitidine as postremission therapy with respect to disease-free survival (DFS; primary end point) and overall survival (OS; secondary end point). In total, 116 eligible patients were randomly (1:1) assigned to either observation (N = 60) or azacitidine maintenance (N = 56; 50 mg/m2, subcutaneously, days 1-5, every 4 weeks) until relapse, for a maximum of 12 cycles. Fifty-five patients received at least 1 cycle of azacitidine, 46 at least 4 cycles, and 35 at least 12 cycles. The maintenance treatment with azacitidine was feasible. DFS was significantly better for the azacitidine treatment group (logrank; P = .04), as well as after adjustment for poor-risk cytogenetic abnormalities at diagnosis and platelet count at randomization (as surrogate for CR vs CRi; Cox regression; hazard ratio, 0.62; 95% confidence interval, 0.41-0.95; P = .026). The 12-month DFS was estimated at 64% for the azacitidine group and 42% for the control group. OS did not differ between treatment groups, with and without censoring for allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. Rescue treatment was used more often in the observation group (n = 32) than in the azacitidine maintenance group (n = 9). We conclude that azacitidine maintenance after CR/CRi after intensive chemotherapy is feasible and significantly improves DFS. The study is registered with The Netherlands Trial Registry (NTR1810) and EudraCT (2008-001290-15).
© 2019 by The American Society of Hematology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30630862     DOI: 10.1182/blood-2018-10-879866

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Blood        ISSN: 0006-4971            Impact factor:   22.113


  26 in total

1.  Glasdegib as maintenance therapy for patients with AML and MDS patients at high risk for postallogeneic stem cell transplant relapse.

Authors:  Andrew Kent; Sumithira Vasu; Derek Schatz; Natalie Monson; Steven Devine; Clayton Smith; Jonathan A Gutman; Daniel A Pollyea
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2020-07-14

2.  Considerations for Managing Patients With Hematologic Malignancy During the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Seattle Strategy.

Authors:  Mary-Elizabeth M Percival; Ryan C Lynch; Anna B Halpern; Mazyar Shadman; Ryan D Cassaday; Chaitra Ujjani; Andrei Shustov; Yolanda D Tseng; Catherine Liu; Steven Pergam; Edward N Libby; Bart L Scott; Stephen D Smith; Damian J Green; Ajay K Gopal; Andrew J Cowan
Journal:  JCO Oncol Pract       Date:  2020-05-05

Review 3.  Post-remission therapy in acute myeloid leukemia: Are we ready for an individualized approach?

Authors:  Benjamin A Derman; Richard A Larson
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Haematol       Date:  2019-10-18       Impact factor: 3.020

4.  Hypo, Hyper, or Combo: new paradigm for treatment of acute myeloid leukemia in older people.

Authors:  Gunnar Juliusson; Martin Höglund; Sören Lehmann
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2020-01-31       Impact factor: 9.941

5.  Phase I/II multisite trial of optimally dosed clofarabine and low-dose TBI for hematopoietic cell transplantation in acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Elizabeth F Krakow; Boglarka Gyurkocza; Barry E Storer; Thomas R Chauncey; Jeannine S McCune; Jerald P Radich; Michelle E Bouvier; Elihu H Estey; Rainer Storb; David G Maloney; Brenda M Sandmaier
Journal:  Am J Hematol       Date:  2019-11-08       Impact factor: 10.047

Review 6.  Older Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia Deserve Individualized Treatment.

Authors:  David C de Leeuw; Gert J Ossenkoppele; Jeroen J W M Janssen
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2022-06-02       Impact factor: 5.075

Review 7.  Clinical developments in epigenetic-directed therapies in acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Darren Pan; Raajit Rampal; John Mascarenhas
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2020-03-10

8.  A phase 3 randomized study of 5-azacitidine maintenance vs observation after transplant in high-risk AML and MDS patients.

Authors:  Betül Oran; Marcos de Lima; Guillermo Garcia-Manero; Peter F Thall; Ruitao Lin; Uday Popat; Amin M Alousi; Chitra Hosing; Sergio Giralt; Gabriela Rondon; Glenda Woodworth; Richard E Champlin
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2020-11-10

Review 9.  Recent advances of targeted therapy in relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Jiale Ma; Zheng Ge
Journal:  Bosn J Basic Med Sci       Date:  2021-08-01       Impact factor: 3.363

Review 10.  Post-Induction Treatment for Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Something Change?

Authors:  Sonia Jaramillo; Richard F Schlenk
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2021-07-16       Impact factor: 5.075

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.