Literature DB >> 30630627

Stance and swing phase knee flexion recover at different rates following total knee arthroplasty: An inertial measurement unit study.

Ryan M Chapman1, Wayne E Moschetti2, Douglas W Van Citters3.   

Abstract

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is the most common joint replacement in the United States. Range of motion (ROM) monitoring includes idealized clinic measures (e.g. goniometry during passive ROM) that may not accurately represent knee function. Accordingly, a novel, portable, inertial measurement unit (IMU) based ROM measurement method was developed, validated, and implemented. Knee flexion was computed via relative motion between two IMUs and validated via optical motion capture (p > 0.05). Prospective analyses of 10 healthy individuals (5M, 50 ± 19 years) and 20 patients undergoing TKA (3 lost to follow up, 10M, 65 ± 6 years) were completed. Controls wore IMUs for 1-week. Patients wore IMUs for 1-week pre-TKA, 6-weeks immediately post-TKA, and 1-week at 1-year post-TKA. Flexion was computed continuously each day (8-12 h). Metrics included daily maximum flexion and flexion during stance/swing phases of gait. Maximum flexion was equal between cohorts at all time points. Contrastingly, patient stance and swing flexion were reduced pre-TKA, yet improved post-TKA. Specifically, patient stance and swing flexion were reduced below control/pre-TKA values during post-TKA week 1. Stance flexion exceeded pre-TKA and equaled control levels after week 2. However, swing flexion only exceeded pre-TKA and equaled control levels at 1-year post-TKA. This novel method improves upon the accuracy/portability of current methods (e.g. goniometry). Interestingly, surgery did not impact maximum ROM, yet improved the ability to flex during gait allowing more efficient and safe ambulation. This is the first study continuously monitoring long-term flexion before/after TKA. The results offer richer information than clinical measures about expected TKA rehabilitation.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Arthroplasty; Inertial measurement unit; Knee; Range of motion; Rehabilitation

Year:  2018        PMID: 30630627     DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2018.12.027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  6 in total

1.  Metrics extracted from a single wearable sensor during sit-stand transitions relate to mobility impairment and fall risk in people with multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Lindsey J Tulipani; Brett Meyer; Dale Larie; Andrew J Solomon; Ryan S McGinnis
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2020-06-20       Impact factor: 2.840

Review 2.  A Systematic Review of Diagnostic Accuracy and Clinical Applications of Wearable Movement Sensors for Knee Joint Rehabilitation.

Authors:  Robert Prill; Marina Walter; Aleksandra Królikowska; Roland Becker
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-09       Impact factor: 3.576

3.  A Portable Wearable Inertial System for Rehabilitation Monitoring and Evaluation of Patients With Total Knee Replacement.

Authors:  Nan Lou; Yanan Diao; Qiangqiang Chen; Yunkun Ning; Gaoqiang Li; Shengyun Liang; Guanglin Li; Guoru Zhao
Journal:  Front Neurorobot       Date:  2022-03-23       Impact factor: 2.650

4.  Wearables-Only Analysis of Muscle and Joint Mechanics: An EMG-Driven Approach.

Authors:  Reed D Gurchiek; Nicole Donahue; Niccolo M Fiorentino; Ryan S McGinnis
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2022-01-20       Impact factor: 4.538

Review 5.  Validity and reliability of wearable inertial sensors in healthy adult walking: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Dylan Kobsar; Jesse M Charlton; Calvin T F Tse; Jean-Francois Esculier; Angelo Graffos; Natasha M Krowchuk; Daniel Thatcher; Michael A Hunt
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2020-05-11       Impact factor: 4.262

6.  Current clinical utilisation of wearable motion sensors for the assessment of outcome following knee arthroplasty: a scoping review.

Authors:  Scott R Small; Garrett S Bullock; Sara Khalid; Karen Barker; Marialena Trivella; Andrew James Price
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-12-29       Impact factor: 2.692

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.