Literature DB >> 30630080

Differential impact of reward and punishment on functional connectivity after skill learning.

Adam Steel1, Edward H Silson2, Charlotte J Stagg3, Chris I Baker2.   

Abstract

Reward and punishment shape behavior, but the mechanisms underlying their effect on skill learning are not well understood. Here, we tested whether the functional connectivity of premotor cortex (PMC), a region known to be critical for learning of sequencing skills, is altered after training when reward or punishment is given during training. Resting-state fMRI was collected in two experiments before and after participants trained on either a serial reaction time task (SRTT; n = 36) or force-tracking task (FTT; n = 36) with reward, punishment, or control feedback. In each experiment, training-related change in PMC functional connectivity was compared across feedback groups. In both tasks, we found that reward and punishment differentially affected PMC functional connectivity. On the SRTT, participants trained with reward showed an increase in functional connectivity between PMC and cerebellum as well as PMC and striatum, while participants trained with punishment showed an increase in functional connectivity between PMC and medial temporal lobe connectivity. After training on the FTT, subjects trained with control and reward showed increases in PMC connectivity with parietal and temporal cortices after training, while subjects trained with punishment showed increased PMC connectivity with ventral striatum. While the results from the two experiments overlapped in some areas, including ventral pallidum, temporal lobe, and cerebellum, these regions showed diverging patterns of results across the two tasks for the different feedback conditions. These findings suggest that reward and punishment strongly influence spontaneous brain activity after training, and that the regions implicated depend on the task learned. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Consolidation; Motivation; Motor learning; Premotor cortex; Sequence learning

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30630080      PMCID: PMC7612345          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.01.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  69 in total

1.  Awareness modifies the skill-learning benefits of sleep.

Authors:  Edwin M Robertson; Alvaro Pascual-Leone; Daniel Z Press
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2004-02-03       Impact factor: 10.834

2.  Mapping sources of correlation in resting state FMRI, with artifact detection and removal.

Authors:  Hang Joon Jo; Ziad S Saad; W Kyle Simmons; Lydia A Milbury; Robert W Cox
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-04-24       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  BOLD contrast sensitivity enhancement and artifact reduction with multiecho EPI: parallel-acquired inhomogeneity-desensitized fMRI.

Authors:  Benedikt A Poser; Maarten J Versluis; Johannes M Hoogduin; David G Norris
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 4.668

4.  Neural substrates of visuomotor learning based on improved feedback control and prediction.

Authors:  Scott T Grafton; Paul Schmitt; John Van Horn; Jörn Diedrichsen
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-10-12       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 5.  Hippocampus and striatum: dynamics and interaction during acquisition and sleep-related motor sequence memory consolidation.

Authors:  Geneviève Albouy; Bradley R King; Pierre Maquet; Julien Doyon
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 3.899

6.  Specificity of action representations in the lateral occipitotemporal cortex.

Authors:  Joseph W Kable; Anjan Chatterjee
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Changing brain networks for visuomotor control with increased movement automaticity.

Authors:  A Floyer-Lea; P M Matthews
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Distinguishable brain activation networks for short- and long-term motor skill learning.

Authors:  A Floyer-Lea; P M Matthews
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2005-02-16       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Skill learning strengthens cortical representations of motor sequences.

Authors:  Tobias Wiestler; Jörn Diedrichsen
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2013-07-09       Impact factor: 8.140

10.  Effective reinforcement learning following cerebellar damage requires a balance between exploration and motor noise.

Authors:  Amanda S Therrien; Daniel M Wolpert; Amy J Bastian
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2015-12-01       Impact factor: 13.501

View more
  4 in total

1.  Visuomotor errors drive step length and step time adaptation during 'virtual' split-belt walking: the effects of reinforcement feedback.

Authors:  Sumire Sato; Ashley Cui; Julia T Choi
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2021-11-23       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Life events and parent style for mental health in children: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Yanlin Li; Jiahui Chu; Fang Wen; Liping Yu; Junjuan Yan; Fang Wang; Jingran Liu; Ying Li; Yonghua Cui
Journal:  Pediatr Res       Date:  2022-08-04       Impact factor: 3.953

3.  Intention to learn modulates the impact of reward and punishment on sequence learning.

Authors:  Adam Steel; Chris I Baker; Charlotte J Stagg
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Reward boosts reinforcement-based motor learning.

Authors:  Pierre Vassiliadis; Gerard Derosiere; Cecile Dubuc; Aegryan Lete; Frederic Crevecoeur; Friedhelm C Hummel; Julie Duque
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2021-07-07
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.