John A L Meeuwsen1, Judith J de Vries1, Amerik van Duijvenvoorde1, Saskia van der Velden2, Sander W van der Laan3, Ian D van Koeverden1, Sander M van de Weg1, Gert J de Borst4, Menno P J de Winther2, Johan Kuiper5, Gerard Pasterkamp3, Imo E Hoefer6, Saskia C A de Jager7. 1. Laboratory for Experimental Cardiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands. 2. Department of Medical Biochemistry, Experimental Vascular Biology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. 3. Laboratory for Clinical Chemistry and Haematology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands. 4. Department of Vascular Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands. 5. Division of Biotherapeutics, Leiden Academic Centre for Drug Research, Leiden University, Leiden, the Netherlands. 6. Laboratory for Experimental Cardiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.; Laboratory for Clinical Chemistry and Haematology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands. 7. Laboratory for Experimental Cardiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.; Laboratory of Translational Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands. Electronic address: S.C.A.dejager@umcutrecht.nl.
Abstract
AIMS: Mouse studies have established distinct monocyte subtypes that participate in the process of atherosclerotic lesion formation. The pro-inflammatory Ly6Chigh monocyte subtype actively contributes to murine plaque progression and destabilization. Also in humans, different peripheral monocyte subtypes have been identified, of which the CD14+CD16- classical monocyte is suggested to display similar pro-atherosclerotic properties as the murine Ly6Chigh subtype. We aimed to investigate if circulating CD14+CD16- classical monocytes associate with characteristics of a vulnerable carotid atherosclerotic plaque and if they associate with the risk of secondary adverse manifestations of atherosclerotic disease. METHODS AND RESULTS: We enrolled 175 carotid endarterectomy patients of the Athero-Express biobank in our study. Just prior to surgical procedure, blood was collected and peripheral blood mononuclear cells were isolated. Characterization of monocyte subsets was performed by flow cytometry. Plaque characteristics were semi-quantitatively scored for the presence of fat, collagen, intraplaque hemorrhage and calcification. Vessel density, smooth muscle cells and macrophages were assessed quantitatively on a continuous scale. All features of a vulnerable plaque phenotype, including low amounts of collagen and smooth muscle cells, and increased fat content, vessel density, intraplaque hemorrhage and plaque macrophages were not significantly associated with differential levels of peripheral classical CD14+CD16- monocytes or other monocyte subsets. Using Cox regression models to evaluate the prognostic value of circulating monocyte subtypes, we found that total counts of peripheral monocytes, as well as CD14+CD16- classical and other monocyte subtypes were not associated with the risk of secondary cardiovascular events during 3 years follow-up. CONCLUSION: Circulating classical CD14+CD16- monocytes do not associate with specific vulnerable plaque characteristics. In addition, they do not predict secondary adverse manifestations. This suggests that in patients with established carotid artery disease, the circulating monocytes do not reflect plaque characteristics and have no value in identifying patients at risk for future cardiovascular events.
AIMS: Mouse studies have established distinct monocyte subtypes that participate in the process of atherosclerotic lesion formation. The pro-inflammatory Ly6Chigh monocyte subtype actively contributes to murine plaque progression and destabilization. Also in humans, different peripheral monocyte subtypes have been identified, of which the CD14+CD16- classical monocyte is suggested to display similar pro-atherosclerotic properties as the murine Ly6Chigh subtype. We aimed to investigate if circulating CD14+CD16- classical monocytes associate with characteristics of a vulnerable carotid atherosclerotic plaque and if they associate with the risk of secondary adverse manifestations of atherosclerotic disease. METHODS AND RESULTS: We enrolled 175 carotid endarterectomy patients of the Athero-Express biobank in our study. Just prior to surgical procedure, blood was collected and peripheral blood mononuclear cells were isolated. Characterization of monocyte subsets was performed by flow cytometry. Plaque characteristics were semi-quantitatively scored for the presence of fat, collagen, intraplaque hemorrhage and calcification. Vessel density, smooth muscle cells and macrophages were assessed quantitatively on a continuous scale. All features of a vulnerable plaque phenotype, including low amounts of collagen and smooth muscle cells, and increased fat content, vessel density, intraplaque hemorrhage and plaque macrophages were not significantly associated with differential levels of peripheral classical CD14+CD16- monocytes or other monocyte subsets. Using Cox regression models to evaluate the prognostic value of circulating monocyte subtypes, we found that total counts of peripheral monocytes, as well as CD14+CD16- classical and other monocyte subtypes were not associated with the risk of secondary cardiovascular events during 3 years follow-up. CONCLUSION: Circulating classical CD14+CD16- monocytes do not associate with specific vulnerable plaque characteristics. In addition, they do not predict secondary adverse manifestations. This suggests that in patients with established carotid artery disease, the circulating monocytes do not reflect plaque characteristics and have no value in identifying patients at risk for future cardiovascular events.
Authors: M Reijrink; J van Ark; C P H Lexis; L M Visser; M E Lodewijk; I C C van der Horst; C J Zeebregts; H van Goor; S C A de Jager; G Pasterkamp; B H R Wolffenbuttel; J L Hillebrands Journal: Cardiovasc Diabetol Date: 2022-05-12 Impact factor: 8.949
Authors: Ivo N SahBandar; Lishomwa C Ndhlovu; Katelyn Saiki; Lindsay B Kohorn; Mary Margaret Peterson; Michelle L D'Antoni; Bruce Shiramizu; Cecilia M Shikuma; Dominic C Chow Journal: J Atheroscler Thromb Date: 2019-10-04 Impact factor: 4.928
Authors: Theodore S Kapellos; Lorenzo Bonaguro; Ioanna Gemünd; Nico Reusch; Adem Saglam; Emily R Hinkley; Joachim L Schultze Journal: Front Immunol Date: 2019-08-30 Impact factor: 7.561