Endolysosome entrapment is one of the key barriers to the therapeutic use of biologic drugs that act intracellularly. The screening of prospective nanoscale endosome-disrupting delivery technologies is currently limited by methods that are indirect and cumbersome. Here, we statistically validate Galectin 8 (Gal8) intracellular tracking as a superior approach that is direct, quantitative, and predictive of therapeutic cargo intracellular bioactivity through in vitro high-throughput screening and in vivo validation. Gal8 is a cytosolically dispersed protein that, when endosomes are disrupted, redistributes by binding to glycosylation moieties selectively located on the inner face of endosomal membranes. The quantitative redistribution of a Gal8 fluorescent fusion protein from the cytosol into endosomes is demonstrated as a real-time, live-cell assessment of endosomal integrity that does not require labeling or modification of either the carrier or the biologic drug and that allows quantitative distinction between closely related, endosome-disruptive drug carriers. Through screening two families of siRNA polymeric carrier compositions at varying dosages, we show that Gal8 endosomal recruitment correlates strongly ( r = 0.95 and p < 10-4) with intracellular siRNA bioactivity. Through this screen, we gathered insights into how composition and molecular weight affect endosome disruption activity of poly[(ethylene glycol)- b-[(2-(dimethylamino)ethyl methacrylate)- co-(butyl methacrylate)]] [PEG-(DMAEMA- co-BMA)] siRNA delivery systems. Additional studies showed that Gal8 recruitment predicts intracellular bioactivity better than current standard methods such as Lysotracker colocalization ( r = 0.35, not significant), pH-dependent hemolysis (not significant), or cellular uptake ( r = 0.73 and p < 10-3). Importantly, the Gal8 recruitment method is also amenable to fully objective high-throughput screening using automated image acquisition and quantitative image analysis, with a robust estimated Z' of 0.6 (whereas assays with Z' > 0 have high-throughput screening utility). Finally, we also provide measurements of in vivo endosomal disruption based on Gal8 visualization ( p < 0.03) of a nanocarrier formulation confirmed to produce significant cytosolic delivery and bioactivity of siRNA within tumors ( p < 0.02). In sum, this report establishes the utility of Gal8 subcellular tracking for the rapid optimization and high-throughput screening of the endosome disruption potency of intracellular delivery technologies.
Endolysosome entrapment is one of the key pan class="Chemical">barriers to the therapn>eutic use of n>an class="Chemical">biologic drugs that act intracellularly. The screening of prospective nanoscale endosome-disrupting delivery technologies is currently limited by methods that are indirect and cumbersome. Here, we statistically validate Galectin 8 (Gal8) intracellular tracking as a superior approach that is direct, quantitative, and predictive of therapeutic cargo intracellular bioactivity through in vitro high-throughput screening and in vivo validation. Gal8 is a cytosolically dispersed protein that, when endosomes are disrupted, redistributes by binding to glycosylation moieties selectively located on the inner face of endosomal membranes. The quantitative redistribution of a Gal8 fluorescent fusion protein from the cytosol into endosomes is demonstrated as a real-time, live-cell assessment of endosomal integrity that does not require labeling or modification of either the carrier or the biologic drug and that allows quantitative distinction between closely related, endosome-disruptive drug carriers. Through screening two families of siRNA polymeric carrier compositions at varying dosages, we show that Gal8 endosomal recruitment correlates strongly ( r = 0.95 and p < 10-4) with intracellular siRNA bioactivity. Through this screen, we gathered insights into how composition and molecular weight affect endosome disruption activity of poly[(ethylene glycol)- b-[(2-(dimethylamino)ethyl methacrylate)- co-(butyl methacrylate)]] [PEG-(DMAEMA- co-BMA)] siRNA delivery systems. Additional studies showed that Gal8 recruitment predicts intracellular bioactivity better than current standard methods such as Lysotracker colocalization ( r = 0.35, not significant), pH-dependent hemolysis (not significant), or cellular uptake ( r = 0.73 and p < 10-3). Importantly, the Gal8 recruitment method is also amenable to fully objective high-throughput screening using automated image acquisition and quantitative image analysis, with a robust estimated Z' of 0.6 (whereas assays with Z' > 0 have high-throughput screening utility). Finally, we also provide measurements of in vivo endosomal disruption based on Gal8 visualization ( p < 0.03) of a nanocarrier formulation confirmed to produce significant cytosolic delivery and bioactivity of siRNA within tumors ( p < 0.02). In sum, this report establishes the utility of Gal8 subcellular tracking for the rapid optimization and high-throughput screening of the endosome disruption potency of intracellular delivery technologies.
Entities:
Keywords:
endosomal escape; high-throughput screening; pH-responsive drug carriers; siRNA delivery
Authors: Jerome Gilleron; William Querbes; Anja Zeigerer; Anna Borodovsky; Giovanni Marsico; Undine Schubert; Kevin Manygoats; Sarah Seifert; Cordula Andree; Martin Stöter; Hila Epstein-Barash; Ligang Zhang; Victor Koteliansky; Kevin Fitzgerald; Eugenio Fava; Marc Bickle; Yannis Kalaidzidis; Akin Akinc; Martin Maier; Marino Zerial Journal: Nat Biotechnol Date: 2013-06-23 Impact factor: 54.908
Authors: H J Gruber; C D Hahn; G Kada; C K Riener; G S Harms; W Ahrer; T G Dax; H G Knaus Journal: Bioconjug Chem Date: 2000 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 4.774
Authors: Christopher E Nelson; James R Kintzing; Ann Hanna; Joshua M Shannon; Mukesh K Gupta; Craig L Duvall Journal: ACS Nano Date: 2013-09-23 Impact factor: 15.881
Authors: Geoffrey Y Berguig; Anthony J Convertine; Julie Shi; Maria Corinna Palanca-Wessels; Craig L Duvall; Suzie H Pun; Oliver W Press; Patrick S Stayton Journal: Mol Pharm Date: 2012-11-05 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: John H Lockhart; Jeffrey VanWye; Richa Banerjee; Samuel A Wickline; Hua Pan; Hana Totary-Jain Journal: Mol Ther Date: 2021-02-03 Impact factor: 11.454
Authors: Meilyn Sylvestre; Shixian Lv; Lucy F Yang; Nicholas Luera; David J Peeler; Bing-Mae Chen; Steve R Roffler; Suzie H Pun Journal: J Control Release Date: 2021-01-11 Impact factor: 9.776
Authors: Meredith A Jackson; Shrusti S Patel; Fang Yu; Matthew A Cottam; Evan B Glass; Ella N Hoogenboezem; R Brock Fletcher; Bryan R Dollinger; Prarthana Patil; Danielle D Liu; Isom B Kelly; Sean K Bedingfield; Allyson R King; Rachel E Miles; Alyssa M Hasty; Todd D Giorgio; Craig L Duvall Journal: Biomaterials Date: 2020-11-23 Impact factor: 12.479
Authors: Dinh Chuong Nguyen; Daniel Shae; Hayden M Pagendarm; Kyle W Becker; Mohamed Wehbe; Kameron V Kilchrist; Lucinda E Pastora; Christian R Palmer; Pedro Seber; Plamen P Christov; Craig L Duvall; John T Wilson Journal: Adv Healthc Mater Date: 2020-11-23 Impact factor: 9.933