Endolysosome entrapment is one of the key barriers to the therapeutic use of biologic drugs that act intracellularly. The screening of prospective nanoscale endosome-disrupting delivery technologies is currently limited by methods that are indirect and cumbersome. Here, we statistically validate Galectin 8 (Gal8) intracellular tracking as a superior approach that is direct, quantitative, and predictive of therapeutic cargo intracellular bioactivity through in vitro high-throughput screening and in vivo validation. Gal8 is a cytosolically dispersed protein that, when endosomes are disrupted, redistributes by binding to glycosylation moieties selectively located on the inner face of endosomal membranes. The quantitative redistribution of a Gal8 fluorescent fusion protein from the cytosol into endosomes is demonstrated as a real-time, live-cell assessment of endosomal integrity that does not require labeling or modification of either the carrier or the biologic drug and that allows quantitative distinction between closely related, endosome-disruptive drug carriers. Through screening two families of siRNA polymeric carrier compositions at varying dosages, we show that Gal8 endosomal recruitment correlates strongly ( r = 0.95 and p < 10-4) with intracellular siRNA bioactivity. Through this screen, we gathered insights into how composition and molecular weight affect endosome disruption activity of poly[(ethylene glycol)- b-[(2-(dimethylamino)ethyl methacrylate)- co-(butyl methacrylate)]] [PEG-(DMAEMA- co-BMA)] siRNA delivery systems. Additional studies showed that Gal8 recruitment predicts intracellular bioactivity better than current standard methods such as Lysotracker colocalization ( r = 0.35, not significant), pH-dependent hemolysis (not significant), or cellular uptake ( r = 0.73 and p < 10-3). Importantly, the Gal8 recruitment method is also amenable to fully objective high-throughput screening using automated image acquisition and quantitative image analysis, with a robust estimated Z' of 0.6 (whereas assays with Z' > 0 have high-throughput screening utility). Finally, we also provide measurements of in vivo endosomal disruption based on Gal8 visualization ( p < 0.03) of a nanocarrier formulation confirmed to produce significant cytosolic delivery and bioactivity of siRNA within tumors ( p < 0.02). In sum, this report establishes the utility of Gal8 subcellular tracking for the rapid optimization and high-throughput screening of the endosome disruption potency of intracellular delivery technologies.
Endolysosome entrapment is one of the key barriers to the therapeutic use of biologic drugs that act intracellularly. The screening of prospn>an class="Chemical">ective nanoscale endosome-disrupting delivery technologies is currently limited by methods that are indirect and cumbersome. Here, we statistically validate Galectin 8 (Gal8) intracellular tracking as a superior approach that is direct, quantitative, and predictive of therapeutic cargo intracellular bioactivity through in vitro high-throughput screening and in vivo validation. Gal8 is a cytosolically dispersed protein that, when endosomes are disrupted, redistributes by binding to glycosylation moieties selectively located on the inner face of endosomal membranes. The quantitative redistribution of a Gal8 fluorescent fusion protein from the cytosol into endosomes is demonstrated as a real-time, live-cell assessment of endosomal integrity that does not require labeling or modification of either the carrier or the biologic drug and that allows quantitative distinction between closely related, endosome-disruptive drug carriers. Through screening two families of siRNA polymeric carrier compositions at varying dosages, we show that Gal8 endosomal recruitment correlates strongly ( r = 0.95 and p < 10-4) with intracellular siRNA bioactivity. Through this screen, we gathered insights into how composition and molecular weight affect endosome disruption activity of poly[(ethylene glycol)- b-[(2-(dimethylamino)ethyl methacrylate)- co-(butyl methacrylate)]] [PEG-(DMAEMA- co-BMA)] siRNA delivery systems. Additional studies showed that Gal8 recruitment predicts intracellular bioactivity better than current standard methods such as Lysotracker colocalization ( r = 0.35, not significant), pH-dependent hemolysis (not significant), or cellular uptake ( r = 0.73 and p < 10-3). Importantly, the Gal8 recruitment method is also amenable to fully objective high-throughput screening using automated image acquisition and quantitative image analysis, with a robust estimated Z' of 0.6 (whereas assays with Z' > 0 have high-throughput screening utility). Finally, we also provide measurements of in vivo endosomal disruption based on Gal8 visualization ( p < 0.03) of a nanocarrier formulation confirmed to produce significant cytosolic delivery and bioactivity of siRNA within tumors ( p < 0.02). In sum, this report establishes the utility of Gal8 subcellular tracking for the rapid optimization and high-throughput screening of the endosome disruption potency of intracellular delivery technologies.
Entities:
Keywords:
endosomal escape; high-throughput screening; pH-responsive drug carriers; siRNA delivery
Authors: Jerome Gilleron; William Querbes; Anja Zeigerer; Anna Borodovsky; Giovanni Marsico; Undine Schubert; Kevin Manygoats; Sarah Seifert; Cordula Andree; Martin Stöter; Hila Epstein-Barash; Ligang Zhang; Victor Koteliansky; Kevin Fitzgerald; Eugenio Fava; Marc Bickle; Yannis Kalaidzidis; Akin Akinc; Martin Maier; Marino Zerial Journal: Nat Biotechnol Date: 2013-06-23 Impact factor: 54.908
Authors: H J Gruber; C D Hahn; G Kada; C K Riener; G S Harms; W Ahrer; T G Dax; H G Knaus Journal: Bioconjug Chem Date: 2000 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 4.774
Authors: Christopher E Nelson; James R Kintzing; Ann Hanna; Joshua M Shannon; Mukesh K Gupta; Craig L Duvall Journal: ACS Nano Date: 2013-09-23 Impact factor: 15.881
Authors: Geoffrey Y Berguig; Anthony J Convertine; Julie Shi; Maria Corinna Palanca-Wessels; Craig L Duvall; Suzie H Pun; Oliver W Press; Patrick S Stayton Journal: Mol Pharm Date: 2012-11-05 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: John H Lockhart; Jeffrey VanWye; Richa Banerjee; Samuel A Wickline; Hua Pan; Hana Totary-Jain Journal: Mol Ther Date: 2021-02-03 Impact factor: 11.454
Authors: Meilyn Sylvestre; Shixian Lv; Lucy F Yang; Nicholas Luera; David J Peeler; Bing-Mae Chen; Steve R Roffler; Suzie H Pun Journal: J Control Release Date: 2021-01-11 Impact factor: 9.776
Authors: Meredith A Jackson; Shrusti S Patel; Fang Yu; Matthew A Cottam; Evan B Glass; Ella N Hoogenboezem; R Brock Fletcher; Bryan R Dollinger; Prarthana Patil; Danielle D Liu; Isom B Kelly; Sean K Bedingfield; Allyson R King; Rachel E Miles; Alyssa M Hasty; Todd D Giorgio; Craig L Duvall Journal: Biomaterials Date: 2020-11-23 Impact factor: 12.479
Authors: Dinh Chuong Nguyen; Daniel Shae; Hayden M Pagendarm; Kyle W Becker; Mohamed Wehbe; Kameron V Kilchrist; Lucinda E Pastora; Christian R Palmer; Pedro Seber; Plamen P Christov; Craig L Duvall; John T Wilson Journal: Adv Healthc Mater Date: 2020-11-23 Impact factor: 9.933