Literature DB >> 30629298

Do body-related sensations make feel us better? Subjective well-being is associated only with the subjective aspect of interoception.

Eszter Ferentzi1,2, Áron Horváth1,2, Ferenc Köteles2.   

Abstract

According to the proposition of several theoretical accounts, the perception of the bodily cues, interoceptive accuracy and interoceptive sensibility, has a significant positive impact on subjective well-being. Others assume a negative association; however, empirical evidence is scarce. In this study, 142 young adults completed questionnaires assessing subjective well-being, interoceptive sensibility, and subjective somatic symptoms and participated in measurements of proprioceptive accuracy (reproduction of the angle of the elbow joint), gastric sensitivity (water load test), and heartbeat tracking ability (Schandry task). Subjective well-being showed weak to medium positive associations with interoceptive sensibility and weak negative associations with symptom reports. No associations with measures of interoceptive accuracy were found. Gastric sensitivity as opposed to heartbeat perception and proprioceptive accuracy moderated the association between interoceptive sensibility and well-being. Thus, subjective well-being is associated only with the self-reported (perceived) aspect of interoception but not related to the sensory measures of interoceptive accuracy.
© 2019 Society for Psychophysiological Research.

Entities:  

Keywords:  interoception; proprioception; somatic symptoms; water load test; well-being

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30629298     DOI: 10.1111/psyp.13319

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychophysiology        ISSN: 0048-5772            Impact factor:   4.016


  8 in total

1.  Questionnaires of interoception do not assess the same construct.

Authors:  Luca Vig; Ferenc Köteles; Eszter Ferentzi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-08-23       Impact factor: 3.752

2.  Dimensions of interoception in obsessive-compulsive disorder.

Authors:  Goi Khia Eng; Katherine A Collins; Carina Brown; Molly Ludlow; Russell H Tobe; Dan V Iosifescu; Emily R Stern
Journal:  J Obsessive Compuls Relat Disord       Date:  2020-09-10       Impact factor: 1.677

3.  Mindfulness, Interoception, and the Body: A Contemporary Perspective.

Authors:  Jonathan Gibson
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2019-09-13

4.  Mindfulness-Based Interventions and Body Awareness.

Authors:  Marbella Pérez-Peña; Jessica Notermans; Olivier Desmedt; Katleen Van der Gucht; Pierre Philippot
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2022-02-18

5.  Interoceptive accuracy and bias in somatic symptom disorder, illness anxiety disorder, and functional syndromes: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Carolin Wolters; Alexander L Gerlach; Anna Pohl
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-08-18       Impact factor: 3.752

6.  The impact of a brief mindfulness training on interoception: A randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Geissy Lainny de Lima-Araujo; Geovan Menezes de Sousa Júnior; Thatiane Mendes; Marcelo Demarzo; Norman Farb; Draulio Barros de Araujo; Maria Bernardete Cordeiro de Sousa
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-09-07       Impact factor: 3.752

7.  Interoceptive accuracy and its impact on neuronal responses to olfactory stimulation in the insular cortex.

Authors:  Carina J Koeppel; Paul Ruser; Hagen Kitzler; Thomas Hummel; Ilona Croy
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2020-03-26       Impact factor: 5.038

8.  Trait and State: Interoceptive Accuracy during Anticipation of Public Speaking in Junior Secondary Shy Students from an Eastern Province of China.

Authors:  Jianfen Wu; Hui Li; Yunpeng Wu
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-05-06       Impact factor: 3.390

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.