Literature DB >> 30629245

Frameless Robot-Assisted Deep Brain Stimulation Surgery: An Initial Experience.

Allen L Ho1, Arjun V Pendharkar1, Ryan Brewster1, Derek L Martinez1, Richard A Jaffe2, Linda W Xu1, Kai J Miller1, Casey H Halpern1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Modern robotic-assist surgical systems have revolutionized stereotaxy for a variety of procedures by increasing operative efficiency while preserving and even improving accuracy and safety. However, experience with robotic systems in deep brain stimulation (DBS) surgery is scarce.
OBJECTIVE: To present an initial series of DBS surgery performed utilizing a frameless robotic solution for image-guided stereotaxy, and report on operative efficiency, stereotactic accuracy, and complications.
METHODS: This study included the initial 20 consecutive patients undergoing bilateral robot-assisted DBS. The prior 20 nonrobotic, frameless cohort of DBS cases was sampled as a baseline historic control. For both cohorts, patient demographic and clinical data were collected including postoperative complications. Intraoperative duration and number of Microelectrode recording (MER) and final lead passes were recorded. For the robot-assisted cohort, 2D radial errors were calculated.
RESULTS: Mean case times (total operating room, anesthesia, and operative times) were all significantly decreased in the robot-assisted cohort (all P-values < .02) compared to frameless DBS. When looking at trends in case times, operative efficiency improved over time in the robot-assisted cohort across all time assessment points. Mean radial error in the robot-assisted cohort was 1.40 ± 0.11 mm, and mean depth error was 1.05 ± 0.18 mm. There was a significant decrease in the average number of MER passes in the robot-assisted cohort (1.05) compared to the nonrobotic cohort (1.45, P < .001).
CONCLUSION: This is the first report of application of frameless robotic-assistance with the Mazor Renaissance platform (Mazor Robotics Ltd, Caesarea, Israel) for DBS surgery, and our findings reveal that an initial experience is safe and can have a positive impact on operative efficiency, accuracy, and safety.
Copyright © 2019 by the Congress of Neurological Surgeons.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DBS; Deep brain stimulation; Frameless; Mazor; Robot-assisted; Robotic; Stereotaxy

Year:  2019        PMID: 30629245     DOI: 10.1093/ons/opy395

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown)        ISSN: 2332-4252            Impact factor:   2.703


  4 in total

Review 1.  Review of the Standard and Advanced Screening, Staging Systems and Treatment Modalities for Cervical Cancer.

Authors:  Siaw Shi Boon; Ho Yin Luk; Chuanyun Xiao; Zigui Chen; Paul Kay Sheung Chan
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-13       Impact factor: 6.575

2.  Robotic-Assisted Stereotaxy for Deep Brain Stimulation Lead Implantation in Awake Patients.

Authors:  Amir H Faraji; Vasileios Kokkinos; James C Sweat; Donald J Crammond; R Mark Richardson
Journal:  Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown)       Date:  2020-09-15       Impact factor: 2.703

3.  Brain-Responsive Neurostimulation for Loss of Control Eating: Early Feasibility Study.

Authors:  Hemmings Wu; Sarah Adler; Dan E Azagury; Cara Bohon; Debra L Safer; Daniel A N Barbosa; Mahendra T Bhati; Nolan R Williams; Laura B Dunn; Peter A Tass; Brian D Knutson; Maya Yutsis; Ayesha Fraser; Tricia Cunningham; Kara Richardson; Tara L Skarpaas; Thomas K Tcheng; Martha J Morrell; Laura Weiss Roberts; Robert C Malenka; James D Lock; Casey H Halpern
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2020-11-16       Impact factor: 4.654

4.  Electrophysiology and Structural Connectivity of the Posterior Hypothalamic Region: Much to Learn From a Rare Indication of Deep Brain Stimulation.

Authors:  Bina Kakusa; Sabir Saluja; David Y A Dadey; Daniel A N Barbosa; Sandra Gattas; Kai J Miller; Robert P Cowan; Zepure Kouyoumdjian; Nader Pouratian; Casey H Halpern
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2020-05-15       Impact factor: 3.169

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.