Augustine W Kang1,2, Carol Ewing Garber3, Charles B Eaton4,5,6, Patricia M Risica1,2,6, Andrew G Bostom4,5. 1. Department of Behavioral and Social Sciences, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI. 2. Center for Health Equity Research, Brown University, Providence, RI. 3. Department of Biobehavioral Sciences, Teachers College, Columbia University, New York, NY. 4. Department of Family Medicine, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI. 5. Center for Primary Care and Prevention, Kent Hospital, Warwick, RI. 6. Department of Epidemiology, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Research examining the relationship between physical activity (PA) and cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors among kidney transplant recipients (KTR) is limited. Accordingly, we sought to 1) describe the levels of PA in KTR and 2) analyze the associations between PA levels and CVD risk factors in KTR. METHODS: Baseline data from KTR participants in a large multiethnic, multicenter trial (the Folic Acid for Vascular Outcome Reduction in Transplantation) were examined. PA was categorized in tertiles (low, moderate, and high) derived from a modified PA summary score from the Yale Physical Activity Survey. CVD risk factors were examined across levels of PA by ANOVA, Kruskal-Wallis rank test, and hierarchical multiple regression. RESULTS: The 4034 participants were 37% female (mean ± SD = 51.9 ± 9.4 yr of age, 75% White, 97% with stage 2T-4T chronic kidney disease, and 20% with prevalent CVD. Participants in the "high" PA tertile reported more vigorous PA and walking, compared with participants in moderate and low tertiles (both P < 0.001). No differences were observed in daily household, occupational, or sedentary activities across PA tertiles. More participants in the "low" PA tertile were overweight/obese, had a history of prevalent diabetes, and/or had CVD compared with more active participants (all P < 0.001). Hierarchical modeling revealed that younger age (P = 0.002), cadaveric donor source (P = 0.006), shorter transplant vintage (P = 0.025), lower pulse pressure (P < 0.001), and no history of diabetes (P < 0.001) were associated with higher PA scores. CONCLUSION: The most active KTR engaged in more intentional exercise. Lower levels of PA were positively associated with more CVD risk factors. Higher PA levels were associated with younger age and with more positive KTR outcomes.
PURPOSE: Research examining the relationship between physical activity (PA) and cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors among kidney transplant recipients (KTR) is limited. Accordingly, we sought to 1) describe the levels of PA in KTR and 2) analyze the associations between PA levels and CVD risk factors in KTR. METHODS: Baseline data from KTR participants in a large multiethnic, multicenter trial (the Folic Acid for Vascular Outcome Reduction in Transplantation) were examined. PA was categorized in tertiles (low, moderate, and high) derived from a modified PA summary score from the Yale Physical Activity Survey. CVD risk factors were examined across levels of PA by ANOVA, Kruskal-Wallis rank test, and hierarchical multiple regression. RESULTS: The 4034 participants were 37% female (mean ± SD = 51.9 ± 9.4 yr of age, 75% White, 97% with stage 2T-4T chronic kidney disease, and 20% with prevalent CVD. Participants in the "high" PA tertile reported more vigorous PA and walking, compared with participants in moderate and low tertiles (both P < 0.001). No differences were observed in daily household, occupational, or sedentary activities across PA tertiles. More participants in the "low" PA tertile were overweight/obese, had a history of prevalent diabetes, and/or had CVD compared with more active participants (all P < 0.001). Hierarchical modeling revealed that younger age (P = 0.002), cadaveric donor source (P = 0.006), shorter transplant vintage (P = 0.025), lower pulse pressure (P < 0.001), and no history of diabetes (P < 0.001) were associated with higher PA scores. CONCLUSION: The most active KTR engaged in more intentional exercise. Lower levels of PA were positively associated with more CVD risk factors. Higher PA levels were associated with younger age and with more positive KTR outcomes.
Authors: Paul D Thompson; David Buchner; Ileana L Pina; Gary J Balady; Mark A Williams; Bess H Marcus; Kathy Berra; Steven N Blair; Fernando Costa; Barry Franklin; Gerald F Fletcher; Neil F Gordon; Russell R Pate; Beatriz L Rodriguez; Antronette K Yancey; Nanette K Wenger Journal: Circulation Date: 2003-06-24 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Charles A Herzog; Richard W Asinger; Alan K Berger; David M Charytan; Javier Díez; Robert G Hart; Kai-Uwe Eckardt; Bertram L Kasiske; Peter A McCullough; Rod S Passman; Stephanie S DeLoach; Patrick H Pun; Eberhard Ritz Journal: Kidney Int Date: 2011-07-13 Impact factor: 10.612
Authors: Allan J Collins; Robert N Foley; Blanche Chavers; David Gilbertson; Charles Herzog; Areef Ishani; Kirsten Johansen; Bertram L Kasiske; Nancy Kutner; Jiannong Liu; Wendy St Peter; Haifeng Guo; Yan Hu; Allyson Kats; Shuling Li; Suying Li; Julia Maloney; Tricia Roberts; Melissa Skeans; Jon Snyder; Craig Solid; Bryn Thompson; Eric Weinhandl; Hui Xiong; Akeem Yusuf; David Zaun; Cheryl Arko; Shu-Cheng Chen; Frank Daniels; James Ebben; Eric Frazier; Roger Johnson; Daniel Sheets; Xinyue Wang; Beth Forrest; Delaney Berrini; Edward Constantini; Susan Everson; Paul Eggers; Lawrence Agodoa Journal: Am J Kidney Dis Date: 2014-01 Impact factor: 8.860
Authors: Elisa J Gordon; Thomas R Prohaska; Mary P Gallant; Ashwini R Sehgal; David Strogatz; Recai Yucel; David Conti; Laura A Siminoff Journal: Transpl Int Date: 2009-07-10 Impact factor: 3.782
Authors: Augustine W Kang; Andrew G Bostom; Hongseok Kim; Charles B Eaton; Reginald Gohh; John W Kusek; Marc A Pfeffer; Patricia M Risica; Carol E Garber Journal: Nephrol Dial Transplant Date: 2020-08-01 Impact factor: 5.992
Authors: Oyuntugs Byambasukh; Maryse C J Osté; António W Gomes-Neto; Else van den Berg; Gerjan Navis; Stephan J L Bakker; Eva Corpeleijn Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2020-02-03 Impact factor: 4.241