| Literature DB >> 30628511 |
Zeina Al-Mansour1, Hongli Li2, James R Cook3, Louis S Constine4, Stephen Couban5, Douglas A Stewart6, Thomas C Shea7, Pierluigi Porcu8, Jane N Winter9, Brad S Kahl10, Sonali M Smith11, Deborah C Marcellus12, Kevin P Barton1, Glenn M Mills13, Michael LeBlanc2, Lisa M Rimsza14, Stephen J Forman15, John P Leonard16, Richard I Fisher17, Jonathan W Friedberg4, Patrick J Stiff1.
Abstract
Phase II data suggest a benefit to autotransplantation for aggressive T-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (T-NHL) in first remission; randomized trials have yet to validate this. We performed a retrospective analysis of aggressive T-NHL patients in the intergroup randomized consolidative autotransplant trial (SWOG 9704). Of the 370 enrolled, 40 had T-NHL: 12 were not randomized due to ineligibility (n = 1), choice (n = 2), or progression (n = 9), leaving 13 randomized to control and 15 to autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). Two ASCT patients refused transplant and one failed mobilization. The 5-year landmark PFS/OS estimates for ASCT vs. control groups were 40% vs. 38% (p = .56), and 40% vs. 45% (p = .98), respectively. No difference was seen based on IPI, or histologic subtype. Only 1/7 receiving BCNU-based therapy survived vs. 4/5 receiving TBI. Aggressive T-NHL autotransplanted in first remission did not appear to benefit from consolidative ASCT. This and the 30% who dropped out pre-randomization mostly to progression, suggests that improved induction regimens be developed.Entities:
Keywords: T-NHL treatment; consolidative autotransplant; high-risk T-NHL
Year: 2019 PMID: 30628511 PMCID: PMC6620162 DOI: 10.1080/10428194.2018.1563691
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Leuk Lymphoma ISSN: 1026-8022