Literature DB >> 30628097

Do emojis influence social interactions? Neural and behavioral responses to affective emojis in bargaining situations.

Martin Weiß1, Julian Gutzeit1, Johannes Rodrigues1, Patrick Mussel2, Johannes Hewig1.   

Abstract

Emojis are nowadays a common substitute for real facial expressions to integrate emotions in social interaction. In certain contexts, emojis possibly could also transport information beyond emotions, reflecting interindividual differences or social aspects. In this study, we investigated the influence of emojis as socioemotional feedback stimuli on behavior and neural responses in a social decision game. We modified the Ultimatum Game by including emotional feedback provided by the proposer as response to the decision of the participant as receiver. Therefore, we generated identities that differed in their feedback behavior to identify differences in the processing of emotional feedback in a positive (acceptance) versus negative (rejection) frame. Regarding offer sizes, we replicated the valence effect of feedback-related negativity for small offer sizes evoking more negative brain potentials compared to larger ones. Further, we found an effect of affective emojis on distinct ERPs: A face-detecting neural component (N170) was examined to be a part of the processing of emojis, which resulted in significantly more negative amplitudes in response to a sad-looking emoji compared to smiling and neutral ones. Furthermore, P3 amplitudes indicate transmission effects from the feedback emoticons to the neural processing of different offer sizes. In contrast to previous findings, P3 responses of our subjects did not depend on the offer size, but rather by which kind of partner they were made. Since some evaluative processes did not reveal any effects, emojis seem to be less effective than real facial expressions, which convey more information that is socially meaningful.
© 2019 Society for Psychophysiological Research.

Entities:  

Keywords:  decision making; emojis; facial expressions; social neuroscience; ultimatum game

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30628097     DOI: 10.1111/psyp.13321

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychophysiology        ISSN: 0048-5772            Impact factor:   4.016


  5 in total

1.  Empathy-based tolerance towards poor norm violators in third-party punishment.

Authors:  Hui Ouyang; Jingqian Yu; Jipeng Duan; Li Zheng; Lin Li; Xiuyan Guo
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Smiling as negative feedback affects social decision-making and its neural underpinnings.

Authors:  Martin Weiß; Patrick Mussel; Johannes Hewig
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 3.282

3.  A neural perspective on when and why trait greed comes at the expense of others.

Authors:  Patrick Mussel; Johannes Hewig
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-07-29       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Neural correlates of successful costly punishment in the Ultimatum game on a trial-by-trial basis.

Authors:  Patrick Mussel; Martin Weiß; Johannes Rodrigues; Hauke Heekeren; Johannes Hewig
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2022-06-03       Impact factor: 4.235

Review 5.  Emojis in public health and how they might be used for hand hygiene and infection prevention and control.

Authors:  Nasim Lotfinejad; Reza Assadi; Mohammad Hassan Aelami; Didier Pittet
Journal:  Antimicrob Resist Infect Control       Date:  2020-02-10       Impact factor: 4.887

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.