| Literature DB >> 30627252 |
Kohei Shinmura1, Young Ho Choi2, Masashi Shimohira3, Yasutaka Baba4, Shunichiro Ikeda1, Sadao Hayashi1, Yuta Shibamoto3, Chihaya Koriyama5, Takashi Yoshiura1.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To elucidate the prognostic factors in the spontaneous rupture of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and to determine whether transcatheter arterial embolisation (TAE) is associated with better prognosis compared to conservative treatment.Entities:
Keywords: hepatocellular carcinoma; prognosis; rupture; transcatheter arterial embolization (TAE)
Year: 2018 PMID: 30627252 PMCID: PMC6323598 DOI: 10.5114/pjr.2018.77024
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pol J Radiol ISSN: 1733-134X
Patient characteristics of the analysed cohort and comparisons between conservative treatment group (Cons T) and transcatheter arterial embolisation (TAE) groups
| Variables | Total | Cons T group | TAE group | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patients, | 71 | 20 (28) | 51 (72) | |
| Age (y) | 65.1 (13.3) | 68.2 (10.7) | 63.8 (14.1) | 0.378 NS |
| Sex, | 0.621 NS | |||
| Male | 56 (79) | 15 (75) | 41 (80) | |
| Female | 15 (21) | 5 (25) | 10 (20) | |
| Cause of liver damage, | 0.767 NS | |||
| Alcohol | 7 (10) | 1 (5) | 6 (12) | |
| Hepatitis B | 28 (39) | 7 (35) | 21 (41) | |
| Hepatitis C | 18 (25) | 4 (20) | 14 (27) | |
| Non-B, non-C | 6 (8) | 1 (5) | 5 (10) | |
| Child-Pugh classification, | 0.786 NS | |||
| A | 8 (11) | 2 (10) | 6 (12) | |
| B | 34 (48) | 8 (40) | 26 (51) | |
| C | 22 (31) | 7 (35) | 15 (29) | |
| Hepatic encephalopathy, | 0.002 | |||
| Present | 5 (7) | 4 (20) | 1 (2) | |
| Ascites, | 0.209 NS | |||
| Present | 59 (83) | 15 (75) | 44 (86) | |
| Shock vital, | 0.719 NS | |||
| Present | 16 (22) | 4 (20) | 12 (23) | |
| Tumour size (cm) | 7.5 (3.9) | 7.2 (0.8) | 7.6 (4.1) | 0.842 NS |
| Tumour morphology, | 0.778 NS | |||
| Massive | 34 (47) | 6 (30) | 28 (54) | |
| Diffuse | 14 (19) | 5 (25) | 9 (17) | |
| Portal vein tumour thrombosis, | 0.326 NS | |||
| Present | 19 (27) | 7 (35) | 12 (24) | |
| History of HCC treatment, | 0.089 NS | |||
| Present | 42 (59) | 15 (75) | 27 (53) | |
| Secondary management, | 0.083 NS | |||
| TAE | 6 (8) | 0 (0) | 6 (12) | |
| Surgery | 1 (1) | 1 (5) | 0 (0) | |
| None | 62 (87) | 19 (95) | 43 (84) | |
| Serum albumin (g/l) | 2.85 (0.64) | 2.81 (0.55) | 2.87 (0.68) | 0.720 NS |
| Serum total bilirubin (µmol/l) | 3.47 (5.08) | 5.89 (8.62) | 2.51 (2.39) | 0.012 |
| Serum AFP (ng/ml) | 47821 (113213) | 7721 (14084) | 58132 (125013) | 0.238 NS |
| AST (U/l) | 197.8 (262.5) | 205.0 (218.9) | 195.0 (278.9) | 0.889 NS |
| ALT (U/l) | 114.7 (240.7) | 96.6 (118.5) | 121.4 (273.4) | 0.705 NS |
| Haemoglobin (g/dl) | 8.99 (2.49) | 9.16 (2.53) | 8.92 (2.50) | 0.726 NS |
| Prothrombin time (s) | 32.8 (24.6) | 18.7 (15.1) | 37.8 (25.0) | 0.003 |
| BUN (mg/dl) | 24.2 (15.7) | 26.8 (20.4) | 23.3 (13.7) | 0.411 NS |
| CRE (mg/dl) | 1.43 (1.47) | 1.23 (0.79) | 1.50 (1.65) | 0.524 NS |
Cons T – conservative treatment, TAE – transcatheter arterial embolization, NS – not significant, AFP – α-fetoprotein, AST – aspartate aminotransferase, ALT – alanine aminotransferase
Continuous variables are indicated in the mean (SD)
Univariate analysis searching for factors influencing overall survival
| Variables | Number | Median survival (day) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age | 0.316 NS | ||
| ≤ 58 | 24 | 17 | |
| > 58 and < 73 | 22 | 25 | |
| ≥ 73 | 25 | 20 | |
| Sex | 0.006 | ||
| Male | 56 | 25 | |
| Female | 15 | 10 | |
| Institution | 0.855 NS | ||
| A | 15 | 20 | |
| B | 43 | 17 | |
| C | 13 | 28 | |
| Primary management | 0.213 NS | ||
| TAE | 51 | 28 | |
| Cons T | 20 | 16 | |
| Child-Pugh classification | 0.012 | ||
| A | 8 | 30 | |
| B | 34 | 22 | |
| C | 22 | 11 | |
| Hepatic encephalopathy | < 0.001 | ||
| Absent | 64 | 25 | |
| Present | 5 | 1 | |
| Ascites | 0.988 NS | ||
| Absent | 11 | 17 | |
| Present | 59 | 22 | |
| Shock vital | 0.105 NS | ||
| Absent | 54 | 28 | |
| Present | 16 | 10 | |
| Tumour size (cm) | 0.832 NS | ||
| ≤ 4.3 | 17 | 29 | |
| > 4.3 and < 7.8 | 18 | 25 | |
| ≥ 7.8 | 19 | 11 | |
| Tumour morphology | 0.748 NS | ||
| Massive | 34 | 22 | |
| Diffuse | 14 | 16 | |
| Portal vein tumour thrombosis | < 0.001 | ||
| Absent | 52 | 29 | |
| Present | 19 | 10 | |
| Distant metastasis | 0.005 | ||
| Absent | 55 | 25 | |
| Present | 16 | 14 | |
| History of HCC treatment | 0.049 | ||
| Absent | 29 | 18 | |
| Present | 42 | 28 | |
| Serum albumin (g/l) | 0.018 | ||
| ≤ 2.5 | 23 | 11 | |
| > 2.5 and < 3.2 | 21 | 38 | |
| ≥ 3.2 | 20 | 20 | |
| Serum total bilirubin (µmol/l) | < 0.001 | ||
| ≤ 1.2 | 23 | 34 | |
| > 1.2 and < 2.5 | 23 | 20 | |
| ≥ 2.5 | 24 | 10 | |
| Serum AFP (ng/ml) | 0.173 NS | ||
| ≤ 420 | 14 | 30 | |
| > 420 and < 15 700 | 15 | 15 | |
| ≥ 15 700 | 15 | 18 | |
| AST (U/l) | 0.079 NS | ||
| ≤ 63 | 23 | 28 | |
| > 63 and < 144 | 23 | 18 | |
| ≥ 144 | 24 | 13 | |
| ALT (U/l) | 0.228 NS | ||
| ≤ 32 | 24 | 30 | |
| > 32 and < 62 | 24 | 17 | |
| ≥ 62 | 22 | 14 | |
| Haemoglobin (g/dl) | 0.125 NS | ||
| ≤ 7.7 | 23 | 16 | |
| > 7.7 and < 10.0 | 22 | 22 | |
| ≥ 10.0 | 25 | 30 | |
| Prothrombin time (s) | 0.017 | ||
| ≤ 14 | 23 | 34 | |
| > 14 and < 40 | 23 | 10 | |
| ≥ 40 | 23 | 22 | |
| BUN (mg/dl) | 0.732 NS | ||
| ≤ 16.1 | 24 | 25 | |
| > 16.1 and < 23.3 | 24 | 20 | |
| ≥ 23.3 | 22 | 25 | |
| CRE (mg/dl) | 0.974 NS | ||
| ≤ 0.8 | 24 | 25 | |
| > 0.8 and < 1.3 | 21 | 17 | |
| ≥ 1.3 | 25 | 18 |
CI – confidence interval, TAE – transcatheter arterial embolization, Cons T – conservative treatment, NS – not significant, HCC – hepatocellular carcinoma, CI – confident interval, AFP – α-fetoprotein, AST – aspartate aminotransferase, ALT – alanine aminotransferase
Figure 1Cumulative survival rates in the conservative treatment (Cons T) group (n = 20) and in the transcatheter arterial embolization (TAE) group (n = 51). Difference between groups is not significant (p = 0.213)
Multivariable analysis searching for factors influencing overall survival
| Variables | Hazard ratio | 95% CI | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sex (female) | 1.967 | 0.889-4.355 | 0.095 NS |
| Child-Pugh classification | |||
| C | 2.208 | 0.574-8.491 | 0.249 NS |
| B | 1.282 | 0.361-4.548 | 0.700 NS |
| Portal vein tumor thrombosis (present) | 2.080 | 0.962-4.497 | 0.063 NS |
| Distant metastasis (present) | 2.313 | 1.123-4.767 | 0.023 |
| History of HCC treatment (present) | 1.524 | 0.731-3.174 | 0.261 NS |
CI – confidence interval, NS – not significant, HCC – hepatocellular carcinoma
Figure 2Cumulative survival rates in the absence of distant metastasis group (n = 55) and in the presence group (n = 16). Overall survival rate is significantly higher in the absence group than in the presence group (p = 0.005)
Multivariable analysis including patients without distant metastasis
| Variables | Hazard ratio | 95% CI | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sex (female) | 2.249 | 0.894-5.657 | 0.085 NS |
| Child-Pugh classification | |||
| C | 1.849 | 0.368-9.283 | 0.455 NS |
| B | 1.379 | 0.303-6.260 | 0.678 NS |
| Portal vein tumour thrombosis (present) | 2.896 | 1.222-6.864 | 0.015 |
| History of HCC treatment (present) | 1.482 | 0.616-3.564 | 0.380 NS |
CI – confidence interval, NS – not significant, HCC – hepatocellular carcinoma
Figure 3Cumulative survival rates in the absence of portal vein tumor thrombosis group (n = 42) and in the presence group (n = 13) without distant metastasis. Overall survival rate is significantly higher in the absence group than in the presence group (p < 0.001)