Literature DB >> 30627252

Comparison of conservative treatment versus transcatheter arterial embolisation for the treatment of spontaneously ruptured hepatocellular carcinoma.

Kohei Shinmura1, Young Ho Choi2, Masashi Shimohira3, Yasutaka Baba4, Shunichiro Ikeda1, Sadao Hayashi1, Yuta Shibamoto3, Chihaya Koriyama5, Takashi Yoshiura1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To elucidate the prognostic factors in the spontaneous rupture of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and to determine whether transcatheter arterial embolisation (TAE) is associated with better prognosis compared to conservative treatment.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective multicentre study was conducted involving 71 patients with spontaneous rupture of HCC. A conservative treatment group (Cons T group) included 20 patients, while a transcatheter arterial embolisation group (TAE group) included 51 patients.
RESULTS: The median survival time (MST) in the Cons T group was only 16 days and the survival rate was 39% at one month, whereas the MST in the TAE group was 28 days and the one month survival rate was 63%. However, there is no statistically significant difference in the overall survival between Cons T and TAE groups (p = 0.213). Multivariable analysis identified only the presence of distant metastasis as an independent prognostic factor (p = 0.023). A subanalysis including patients without distant metastasis showed that the presence of portal vein tumour thrombosis was a significant prognostic factor (p = 0.015).
CONCLUSIONS: Distant metastasis appears to be a prognostic factor in spontaneous rupture of HCC. In cases without distant metastasis, portal vein tumour thrombosis could influence the prognosis. Our data failed to prove any benefit of TAE as the primary management.

Entities:  

Keywords:  hepatocellular carcinoma; prognosis; rupture; transcatheter arterial embolization (TAE)

Year:  2018        PMID: 30627252      PMCID: PMC6323598          DOI: 10.5114/pjr.2018.77024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pol J Radiol        ISSN: 1733-134X


Introduction

The spontaneous rupture of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a rare but life-threatening presentation of this disease and cause of death in 6.4% of such cases in Japan [1]. The affected patients frequently have poor liver function due to liver cirrhosis and advanced tumour stage, and previous reports showed that the one-month mortality rate ranged from 28% to 71% with a median survival period of 4 to 32 weeks [2-8]. The spontaneous rupture of HCC has been treated with several different methods such as conservative treatment (Cons T) and transcatheter arterial embolisation (TAE). However, due to its relative rarity and difficulty in conducting prospective comparisons, there is little consensus on the appropriate management and prognostic factors. Therefore, we introduced a multi-centre retrospective study to elucidate the prognostic factors in the spontaneous rupture of HCC and to determine whether TAE is associated with better prognosis than Cons T.

Material and methods

Study population and clinical data

This multicentre retrospective study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of each participating institution, and the need for informed consent acquisition was waived. We retrospectively analysed pooled data obtained from the clinical and radiological records of 71 consecutive patients (56 males and 15 females; age range 32-86 years, mean 65.1 years) with spontaneous rupture of HCC, who were treated between October 1989 and December 2011 in three different sites in two countries: hospital A (15 patients), B (43 patients), and C (13 patients). Cause of liver damage (hepatitis type), Child-Pugh classification (A, B, or C), presence/absence of hepatic encephalopathy, ascites, shock vital (systolic blood pressure < 80 mmHg), portal vein tumour thrombosis, distant metastasis, and past history of HCC treatment, tumour size (maximum diameter on axial CT image), tumour morphology (massive or diffuse), serum α-fetoprotein (AFP), blood chemistry data (serum albumin, total bilirubin, aspartate aminotransferase [AST], alanine transaminase [ALT], blood urea nitrogen [BUN], and creatinine), haemoglobin, prothrombin time, primary management (TAE or conservative), and secondary management (TAE or surgery or none) were recorded.

Treatment methods

Attending physician assessed patients’ states and conducted the treatment method (TAE or Cons T) and obtained consent from the patient or patient’s family. TAE was approached from femoral artery with the Seldinger technique. Angiographic catheter was inserted in the hepatic artery and contrast agent was injected, so that branches of bleeding hepatic artery were identified. As an embolic material, gelatin sponge that was cut into small cubes of approximately 1-2 mm3 in size was injected into bleeding arteries. The embolic procedure was finished because we could confirm the stopping of bleeding by angiography. In conservative treatment, a haemostatic agent and/or pain relief drug was intravenously infused.

Statistical analyses

The χ2 test for independence or the Fisher exact test was used for comparison of the two groups. To determine factors influencing overall survival, a univariate analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method and a log-rank test. The survival period was defined as the length of time from the onset of the spontaneous rupture of HCC until death. Subsequently, to identify independent prognostic factors, multivariable analysis was performed using the Cox proportional hazard model from which hazard ratios with their confidence intervals and p values were reported. P < 0.05 was considered statically significant for all analyses. All statistical analyses were performed using StatView; SAS software.

Results

The patients’ characteristics are shown in Table 1. Cause of liver damage was alcoholic in seven patients (10%), hepatitis B in 28 patients (39%), hepatitis C in 18 patients (25%), and non-B non-C in six patients (8%). Eight patients (11%) were in Child-Pugh A class, 34 (48%) in B class, and 22 (31%) in C class. Five patients (7%) had hepatic encephalopathy. Fifty-nine patients (83%) had ascites. Ten patients (16%) had shock vital at the time of admission. Mean tumour size of HCCs was 7.5 cm. Forty-two patients (59%) had past history of HCC treatment. Mean follow-up period was 106.8 days (range 0-2972 days).
Table 1

Patient characteristics of the analysed cohort and comparisons between conservative treatment group (Cons T) and transcatheter arterial embolisation (TAE) groups

VariablesTotalCons T groupTAE groupp value
Patients, n (%)7120 (28)51 (72)
Age (y)65.1 (13.3)68.2 (10.7)63.8 (14.1)0.378 NS
Sex, n (%)0.621 NS
 Male56 (79)15 (75)41 (80)
 Female15 (21)5 (25)10 (20)
Cause of liver damage, n (%)0.767 NS
 Alcohol7 (10)1 (5)6 (12)
 Hepatitis B28 (39)7 (35)21 (41)
 Hepatitis C18 (25)4 (20)14 (27)
 Non-B, non-C6 (8)1 (5)5 (10)
Child-Pugh classification, n (%)0.786 NS
 A8 (11)2 (10)6 (12)
 B34 (48)8 (40)26 (51)
 C22 (31)7 (35)15 (29)
Hepatic encephalopathy, n (%)0.002
 Present5 (7)4 (20)1 (2)
Ascites, n (%)0.209 NS
 Present59 (83)15 (75)44 (86)
Shock vital, n (%)0.719 NS
 Present16 (22)4 (20)12 (23)
Tumour size (cm)7.5 (3.9)7.2 (0.8)7.6 (4.1)0.842 NS
Tumour morphology, n (%)0.778 NS
 Massive34 (47)6 (30)28 (54)
  Diffuse14 (19)5 (25)9 (17)
Portal vein tumour thrombosis, n (%)0.326 NS
  Present19 (27)7 (35)12 (24)
History of HCC treatment, n (%)0.089 NS
 Present42 (59)15 (75)27 (53)
Secondary management, n (%)0.083 NS
  TAE6 (8)0 (0)6 (12)
  Surgery1 (1)1 (5)0 (0)
  None62 (87)19 (95)43 (84)
Serum albumin (g/l)2.85 (0.64)2.81 (0.55)2.87 (0.68)0.720 NS
Serum total bilirubin (µmol/l)3.47 (5.08)5.89 (8.62)2.51 (2.39)0.012
Serum AFP (ng/ml)47821 (113213)7721 (14084)58132 (125013)0.238 NS
AST (U/l)197.8 (262.5)205.0 (218.9)195.0 (278.9)0.889 NS
ALT (U/l)114.7 (240.7)96.6 (118.5)121.4 (273.4)0.705 NS
Haemoglobin (g/dl)8.99 (2.49)9.16 (2.53)8.92 (2.50)0.726 NS
Prothrombin time (s)32.8 (24.6)18.7 (15.1)37.8 (25.0)0.003
BUN (mg/dl)24.2 (15.7)26.8 (20.4)23.3 (13.7)0.411 NS
CRE (mg/dl)1.43 (1.47)1.23 (0.79)1.50 (1.65)0.524 NS

Cons T – conservative treatment, TAE – transcatheter arterial embolization, NS – not significant, AFP – α-fetoprotein, AST – aspartate aminotransferase, ALT – alanine aminotransferase

Continuous variables are indicated in the mean (SD)

Patient characteristics of the analysed cohort and comparisons between conservative treatment group (Cons T) and transcatheter arterial embolisation (TAE) groups Cons T – conservative treatment, TAE – transcatheter arterial embolization, NS – not significant, AFP – α-fetoprotein, AST – aspartate aminotransferase, ALT – alanine aminotransferase Continuous variables are indicated in the mean (SD) Conservative treatment (Cons T group) was employed as the primary management in 20 patients (28%), while transcatheter arterial embolisation (TAE group) was performed in the remaining 51 patients (72%). Hepatic encephalopathy was more frequent in the Cons T group than in the TAE group (p = 0.001). In addition, serum total bilirubin was significantly higher (p = 0.012) and prothrombin time was significantly shorter (p = 0.003) in the Cons T group than in the TAE group. No significant difference was found in the other variables between the two groups. The median survival time (MST) was 22 days, and one-month mortality rate was 56% in all patients. MST in the Cons T group was 16 days and the survival rate was poor: 75 % at seven days, 60 % at 14 days, 39 % at one month, and 22% at three months. On the other hand, MST in TAE group was 28 days and the survival rate was 83% at seven days, 73% at 14 days, 63% at one month, 27% at three months, 18% at 12 months, and 18% at 24 months. However, there was no statistically significant difference in the survival rate between the Cons T and TAE groups (p = 0.213) (Table 2, Figure 1). Factors associated with significantly lower overall survival included being female (p = 0.006), higher Child-Pugh grade (p = 0.012), presence of hepatic encephalopathy (p < 0.001), presence of portal vein tumor thrombosis (p < 0.001), presence of distant metastasis (p = 0.005), presence of past history of HCC (p = 0.049), lower serum albumin (p = 0.018), higher total bilirubin (p < 0.001), and longer prothrombin time (p = 0.017) (Table 2).
Table 2

Univariate analysis searching for factors influencing overall survival

VariablesNumberMedian survival (day)p value (log-rank)
Age0.316 NS
 ≤ 582417
 > 58 and < 732225
 ≥ 732520
Sex0.006
 Male5625
 Female1510
Institution0.855 NS
 A1520
 B4317
 C1328
Primary management0.213 NS
 TAE5128
 Cons T2016
Child-Pugh classification0.012
 A830
 B3422
 C2211
Hepatic encephalopathy< 0.001
 Absent6425
 Present51
Ascites0.988 NS
 Absent1117
 Present5922
Shock vital0.105 NS
 Absent5428
 Present1610
Tumour size (cm)0.832 NS
 ≤ 4.31729
 > 4.3 and < 7.81825
 ≥ 7.81911
Tumour morphology0.748 NS
 Massive3422
 Diffuse1416
Portal vein tumour thrombosis< 0.001
 Absent5229
 Present1910
Distant metastasis0.005
 Absent5525
 Present1614
History of HCC treatment0.049
 Absent2918
 Present4228
Serum albumin (g/l)0.018
 ≤ 2.52311
 > 2.5 and < 3.22138
 ≥ 3.22020
Serum total bilirubin (µmol/l)< 0.001
 ≤ 1.22334
 > 1.2 and < 2.52320
 ≥ 2.52410
Serum AFP (ng/ml)0.173 NS
 ≤ 4201430
 > 420 and < 15 7001515
 ≥ 15 7001518
AST (U/l)0.079 NS
 ≤ 632328
 > 63 and < 1442318
 ≥ 1442413
ALT (U/l)0.228 NS
 ≤ 322430
 > 32 and < 622417
 ≥ 622214
Haemoglobin (g/dl)0.125 NS
 ≤ 7.72316
 > 7.7 and < 10.02222
 ≥ 10.02530
Prothrombin time (s)0.017
 ≤ 142334
 > 14 and < 402310
 ≥ 402322
BUN (mg/dl)0.732 NS
 ≤ 16.12425
 > 16.1 and < 23.32420
 ≥ 23.32225
CRE (mg/dl)0.974 NS
 ≤ 0.82425
 > 0.8 and < 1.32117
 ≥ 1.32518

CI – confidence interval, TAE – transcatheter arterial embolization, Cons T – conservative treatment, NS – not significant, HCC – hepatocellular carcinoma, CI – confident interval, AFP – α-fetoprotein, AST – aspartate aminotransferase, ALT – alanine aminotransferase

Figure 1

Cumulative survival rates in the conservative treatment (Cons T) group (n = 20) and in the transcatheter arterial embolization (TAE) group (n = 51). Difference between groups is not significant (p = 0.213)

Univariate analysis searching for factors influencing overall survival CI – confidence interval, TAE – transcatheter arterial embolization, Cons T – conservative treatment, NS – not significant, HCC – hepatocellular carcinoma, CI – confident interval, AFP – α-fetoprotein, AST – aspartate aminotransferase, ALT – alanine aminotransferase Cumulative survival rates in the conservative treatment (Cons T) group (n = 20) and in the transcatheter arterial embolization (TAE) group (n = 51). Difference between groups is not significant (p = 0.213) A multivariable analysis admitted factors that were shown to be significant in the univariate analysis. Hepatic encephalopathy, serum total bilirubin, albumin, and prothrombin time were excluded from the analysis because they are included in the Child-Pugh classification. The multivariable analysis identified only the presence of distant metastasis as an independent factor determining lower overall survival (p = 0.023) (Table 3, Figure 2).
Table 3

Multivariable analysis searching for factors influencing overall survival

VariablesHazard ratio95% CIp value
Sex (female)1.9670.889-4.3550.095 NS
Child-Pugh classification
 C2.2080.574-8.4910.249 NS
 B1.2820.361-4.5480.700 NS
Portal vein tumor thrombosis (present)2.0800.962-4.4970.063 NS
Distant metastasis (present)2.3131.123-4.7670.023
History of HCC treatment (present)1.5240.731-3.1740.261 NS

CI – confidence interval, NS – not significant, HCC – hepatocellular carcinoma

Figure 2

Cumulative survival rates in the absence of distant metastasis group (n = 55) and in the presence group (n = 16). Overall survival rate is significantly higher in the absence group than in the presence group (p = 0.005)

Multivariable analysis searching for factors influencing overall survival CI – confidence interval, NS – not significant, HCC – hepatocellular carcinoma Cumulative survival rates in the absence of distant metastasis group (n = 55) and in the presence group (n = 16). Overall survival rate is significantly higher in the absence group than in the presence group (p = 0.005) We performed an additional subanalysis including 55 patients without distant metastasis. A multivariable analysis showed that the presence of portal vein tumour thrombosis was the only significant independent prognostic factor (p = 0.015) (Table 4, Figure 3).
Table 4

Multivariable analysis including patients without distant metastasis

VariablesHazard ratio95% CIp value
Sex (female)2.2490.894-5.6570.085 NS
Child-Pugh classification
 C1.8490.368-9.2830.455 NS
 B1.3790.303-6.2600.678 NS
Portal vein tumour thrombosis (present)2.8961.222-6.8640.015
History of HCC treatment (present)1.4820.616-3.5640.380 NS

CI – confidence interval, NS – not significant, HCC – hepatocellular carcinoma

Figure 3

Cumulative survival rates in the absence of portal vein tumor thrombosis group (n = 42) and in the presence group (n = 13) without distant metastasis. Overall survival rate is significantly higher in the absence group than in the presence group (p < 0.001)

Multivariable analysis including patients without distant metastasis CI – confidence interval, NS – not significant, HCC – hepatocellular carcinoma Cumulative survival rates in the absence of portal vein tumor thrombosis group (n = 42) and in the presence group (n = 13) without distant metastasis. Overall survival rate is significantly higher in the absence group than in the presence group (p < 0.001)

Discussion

In the past, patients with spontaneously ruptured HCC were treated by various surgical procedures including perihepatic packing, suture plication of bleeding tumour, injection of absolute alcohol, hepatic artery ligation, and liver resection [2-13]. However, because those patients tend to have advanced disease and poor liver function from cirrhosis, invasive surgical interventions may not be tolerated. Thus, less invasive treatments such as TAE or conservative management are chosen in the majority of cases. TAE is considered to be highly effective in controlling haemorrhage due to ruptured HCC, and we expected that it would improve prognosis of the affected patients compared to conservative treatment. In fact, our results showed a better prognosis in the TAE group (MST = 28 days) than in the Cons T group (MST = 16 days), but no significant difference in overall survival was revealed between the two groups (p = 0.213). An earlier retrospective study reported by Kirikoshi et al. showed a significantly better prognosis in patients treated with TAE (MST = 224.8 days) than in those treated with conservative therapy (MST = 13.1 days) [11]. The discrepant results can possibly be accounted for by relatively better liver function in their patients than those in our study: percentage of child A patients was 24% and the mean of total bilirubin was 1.8 mmol/l in their study, while percentage of child A patients was 11% and the mean total bilirubin was 3.4 mmol/l in our study. Despite a multitude of previous studies, no general consensus has been achieved on prognostic factors in patients with spontaneous rupture of HCC. In our multivariable analysis, the presence of distant metastasis was the only significant factor that was associated with lower overall survival (Table 3, Figure 2). Sixteen patients had distant metastasis (lung in 11 cases, lymph node in two cases, peritoneum in one case, adrenal gland in one case, and bone in one case), and their MST was 10 days (22 days in the absence group). Aoki et al. [6] analysed patients with spontaneous rupture of HCC and reported that stage IV group was associated with worse prognosis than the stage I-III group. Ueno et al. [14] reported that extrahepatic metastasis showed prognostic significance in multivariate analysis of unresectable HCC patients treated with transcatheter arterial chemoembolisation therapy. Distant metastasis of HCC has been regarded as a terminal event, and intrahepatic lesions were not actively treated in such cases [15]. However, some pervious reports showed that the metastatic lesion of HCC was a minor cause of death and the main cause of death was advanced intrahepatic lesions. In those reports, it was said that if a patient’s liver status is good, treatment for liver and metastatic lesion may improve survival [16-19]. In general, ruptured HCC patient’s liver status was mostly not good. In cases where distant metastasis is present, one should be careful about introducing TAE for treatment of ruptured HCC. Conservative treatment may be preferred in such cases. Our univariate analysis revealed several additional items as possible prognostic factors. The presence of portal vein tumour thrombosis was significantly associated with lower overall survival (Table 2). MST of 19 patients with portal vein tumour thrombosis was 10 days while that of the absence group was 29 days. Okazaki et al. performed TAE in 38 patients with ruptured HCC. Although patients without portal vein tumour thrombus showed longer MST (133 days) than those with it (90 days), no significant difference in prognosis was demonstrated [13]. Nevertheless, our subanalysis including patients without distant metastasis (n = 55) identified it as an independent prognostic factor (p = 0.015) (Table 4, Figure 3). Thus, we consider that portal vein tumour thrombus could be a prognostic factor of ruptured HCC. Portal vein tumour thrombus was found in 12-39% of patients with HCC [1,20-22] and 18-57% of patient with ruptured HCC [6,12,13]. Yamada et al. [23] reported that TAE was contraindicated for patients with portal vein tumour thrombus, because TAE might increase the risk of ischaemic liver damage. On the other hand, some groups reported that TAE was a safe treatment method of HCC with peripheral portal vein tumour thrombus if the patient has good liver function [24-27]. In our study, 19 patients (26%) had portal vein tumour thrombus, and TAE was conducted in 12 cases. There was no significant difference in the survival rate between TAE and conservative treatment (p = 0.1329). When central portal vein tumour thrombus is present, patients with ruptured HCC should be treated conservatively. Tarantino et al. [5] reported that Child-Pugh A vs. B/C variables were statistically significant for overall survival of ruptured HCC patients. In agreement with their report, there was a significant difference in overall survival by Child-Pugh classification factor (C > A) in our univariate analysis (Table 2), although significant association was not confirmed in the multivariable analysis. This could be partly due to the small number of patients in the Child-Pugh A group (n = 8). The presence of hepatic encephalopathy, which is one of the criteria of Child-Pugh classification, was associated with lower overall survival in our univariate analysis (Table 2). Five patients had hepatic encephalopathy, and their MST was one day, whereas MST of 64 patients without it was 25 days. Kim et al. [7] studied 62 patients with ruptured HCC and found that early deaths were independently associated with the presence of hepatic encephalopathy. Serum levels of albumin and total bilirubin are also included in the criteria of Child-Pugh classification. In the univariate analysis, lower albumin and higher bilirubin levels were found to be significantly associated with worse prognosis in ruptured HCC (Table 2). Okazaki et al. [13] reported that MST of the lower serum bilirubin value group (≤ 3.0 mg/dl) was 165 days and that of the higher value group (> 3.0 mg/dl) was 13 days, and that there was significant difference in the survival rate between lower and higher value groups. In our study, MST of the lower serum bilirubin value group (≤ 3.0 µmol/l) was 25 days and that of the higher serum bilirubin value group (> 3.0 µmol/l) was 14 days. There were some limitations in our study. Selection bias may exist due to the retrospective nature of this study. The Cons T group was relatively small.

Conclusions

The presence/absence of distant metastasis appears to be a prognostic factor in spontaneous rupture of HCC. In cases of absent metastasis, portal vein tumour thrombosis could influence the prognosis. Although TAE was associated with longer survival than conservative treatment, our data failed to provide evidence of a significant impact of TAE as the primary management of ruptured HCC. TAE should be conducted with caution, especially in patients with advanced disease.

Conflict of interest

The authors report no conflict of interest.
  27 in total

1.  Management of hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Jordi Bruix; Morris Sherman
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 17.425

Review 2.  Treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma accompanied by portal vein tumor thrombus.

Authors:  Masami Minagawa; Masatoshi Makuuchi
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-12-21       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Intraperitoneal hemorrhage from hepatocellular carcinoma: emergency chemoembolization or embolization.

Authors:  M Okazaki; H Higashihara; F Koganemaru; T Nakamura; H Kitsuki; T Hoashi; M Makuuchi
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization therapy using iodized oil for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: evaluation of three kinds of regimens and analysis of prognostic factors.

Authors:  K Ueno; N Miyazono; H Inoue; H Nishida; I Kanetsuki; M Nakajo
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2000-04-01       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma: comparison of 7 staging systems in an American cohort.

Authors:  Jorge A Marrero; Robert J Fontana; Ashley Barrat; Frederick Askari; Hari S Conjeevaram; Grace L Su; Anna S Lok
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 17.425

6.  Clinical features of hepatocellular carcinoma with extrahepatic metastases.

Authors:  Mitsuteru Natsuizaka; Takumi Omura; Toru Akaike; Yasuaki Kuwata; Katsu Yamazaki; Takahiro Sato; Yoshiyasu Karino; Jouji Toyota; Toshihiro Suga; Masahiro Asaka
Journal:  J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 4.029

7.  Management of spontaneous rupture of hepatocellular carcinoma: single-center experience.

Authors:  C L Liu; S T Fan; C M Lo; W K Tso; R T Poon; C M Lam; J Wong
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2001-09-01       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Extrahepatic metastases of hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  S Katyal; J H Oliver; M S Peterson; J V Ferris; B S Carr; R L Baron
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Clinical features and prognosis of patients with extrahepatic metastases from hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Kiminori Uka; Hiroshi Aikata; Shintaro Takaki; Hiroo Shirakawa; Soo-Cheol Jeong; Keitaro Yamashina; Akira Hiramatsu; Hideaki Kodama; Shoichi Takahashi; Kazuaki Chayama
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-01-21       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 10.  Spontaneous rupture of hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review.

Authors:  Eric C H Lai; W Y Lau
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2006-02
View more
  3 in total

1.  Short-Term and Long-Term Curative Effect of Partial Hepatectomy on Ruptured Hemorrhage of Primary Liver Cancer after TAE.

Authors:  Xiulin Xiao; Lin Zhou; Long Zhang; Zhiyuan Xu; Qixin Dai; Xiaohong Deng
Journal:  Emerg Med Int       Date:  2022-07-05       Impact factor: 1.621

Review 2.  Ruptured Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Current Status of Research.

Authors:  Feng Xia; Elijah Ndhlovu; Mingyu Zhang; Xiaoping Chen; Bixiang Zhang; Peng Zhu
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-02-17       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 3.  Ruptured Hepatocellular Carcinoma: What Do Interventional Radiologists Need to Know?

Authors:  Jingxin Yan; Ting Li; Manjun Deng; Haining Fan
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-06-16       Impact factor: 5.738

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.