| Literature DB >> 30627133 |
Qingying Zhang1, Xuan Chen1, Hongyan Guo1, Luisa M Trindade2, Elma M J Salentijn2, Rong Guo1, Mengbi Guo1, Yanping Xu1, Ming Yang1.
Abstract
Cannabis is one of the most important industrial crops distributed worldwide. However, the phylogeographic structure and domestication knowledge of this crop remains poorly understood. In this study, sequence variations of five chloroplast DNA (cpDNA) regions were investigated to address these questions. For the 645 individuals from 52 Cannabis accessions sampled (25 wild populations and 27 domesticated populations or cultivars), three haplogroups (Haplogroup H, M, L) were identified and these lineages exhibited distinct high-middle-low latitudinal gradients distribution pattern. This pattern can most likely be explained as a consequence of climatic heterogeneity and geographical isolation. Therefore, we examined the correlations between genetic distances and geographical distances, and tested whether the climatic factors are correlated with the cpDNA haplogroup frequencies of populations. The "isolation-by-distance" models were detected for the phylogeographic structure, and the day-length was found to be the most important factor (among 20 BioClim factors) that influenced the population structures. Considering the distinctive phylogeographic structures and no reproductive isolation among members of these lineages, we recommend that Cannabis be recognized as a monotypic genus typified by Cannabis sativa L., containing three subspecies: subsp. sativa, subsp. Indica, and subsp. ruderalis. Within each haplogroup which possesses a relatively independent distribution region, the wild and domesticated populations shared the most common haplotypes, indicating that there are multiregional origins for the domesticated crop. Contrast to the prevalent Central-Asia-Origin hypothesis of C. saltiva, molecular evidence reveals for the first time that the low latitude haplogroup (Haplogroup L) is the earliest divergent lineage, implying that Cannabis is probably originated in low latitude region.Entities:
Keywords: Cannabaceae; cpDNA; genetic diversity; industrial hemp; phylogeography
Year: 2018 PMID: 30627133 PMCID: PMC6309158 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2018.01876
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Plant Sci ISSN: 1664-462X Impact factor: 5.753
Sample information and summary of haplotype distribution, genetic diversity for each population based on the combined five cpDNA regions.
| EG | Inner Mongolia, China | W | 20 | 50.21 | H1(19), H2(1) | 0.100 ± 0.088 | 0.025 ± 0.020 |
| HE | Inner Mongolia, China | W | 27 | 49.28 | H3(17), H6(10) | 0.484 ± 0.054 | 0.013 ± 0.013 |
| YK | Inner Mongolia, China | W | 20 | 49.25 | H3(19), H4(1) | 0.100 ± 0.088 | 0.003 ± 0.006 |
| JL | Jilin, China | W | 13 | 45.02 | H3(9), H4(4) | 0.462 ± 0.110 | 0.013 ± 0.014 |
| AL | Xinjiang, China | W | 20 | 48.20 | H1(20) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| HG | Xinjiang, China | W | 20 | 44.21 | H1(13), H9(7) | 0.479 ± 0.072 | 0.357 ± 0.188 |
| YN | Xinjiang, China | W | 24 | 43.84 | H1(10), H9(14) | 0.507 ± 0.045 | 0.379 ± 0.196 |
| KS | Xinjiang, China | W | 10 | 43.68 | H1(1), H2(9) | 0.200 ± 0.154 | 0.149 ± 0.089 |
| XH | Inner Mongolia, China | W | 25 | 43.78 | H1(18), H5(7) | 0.420 ± 0.082 | 0.290 ± 0.153 |
| TL | Inner Mongolia, China | W | 10 | 43.58 | H3(7), H4(3) | 0.467 ± 0.132 | 0.013 ± 0.014 |
| MN | Xinjiang, China | W | 20 | 43.35 | H9(20) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| NL | Xinjiang, China | W | 22 | 43.25 | H1(22) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| ZL | Inner Mongolia, China | W | 12 | 42.96 | H5(12) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| ZW | Liaoning, China | W | 16 | 42.66 | H3(11), H4(3), H8(2)* | 0.508 ± 0.126 | 0.016 ± 0.015 |
| CH | Inner Mongolia, China | W | 16 | 42.26 | H3(2), H6(14)* | 0.233 ± 0.126 | 0.007 ± 0.009 |
| SD | Shandong, China | W | 19 | 36.25 | H4(2), H7(17)* | 0.199 ± 0.112 | 0.110 ± 0.064 |
| GJ | Tibet, China | W | 8 | 29.88 | H10(8) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| BM | Tibet, China | W | 8 | 29.87 | H9(4), H10(4) | 0.571 ± 0.095 | 0.126 ± 0.079 |
| XZ | Tibet, China | W | 25 | 29.68 | H9(21), H10(4) | 0.280 ± 0.101 | 0.062 ± 0.039 |
| MK | Tibet, China | W | 8 | 29.58 | H5(8) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| DQ | Yunnan, China | W | 15 | 28.47 | H10(1), H12(14) | 0.133 ± 0.112 | 0.052 ± 0.035 |
| DX | Yunnan, China | W | 16 | 28.15 | H10(16) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| DM | Yunnan, China | W | 16 | 27.90 | H9(16) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| XG | Yunnan, China | W | 19 | 27.49 | H5(19) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| XL | Yunnan, China | W | 21 | 27.15 | H9(10), H10(11) | 0.524 ± 0.036 | 0.116 ± 0.067 |
| C445 | Heilongjiang, China | L | 10 | 50.25 | H3(5), H4(5) | 0.556 ± 0.075 | 0.015 ± 0.016 |
| C448 | Heilongjiang, China | L | 11 | 48.01 | H4(11) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| C254 | Inner Mongolia, China | L | 16 | 43.48 | H3(12), H4(1), H9(2), H11(1)* | 0.442 ± 0.145 | 0.136 ± 0.078 |
| C564 | Xinjiang, China | L | 10 | 43.37 | H9(10) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| C261 | Inner Mongolia, China | L | 9 | 40.42 | H5(1), H9(5), H21(1)*, H22(2)* | 0.694 ± 0.147 | 0.095 ± 0.061 |
| C187 | Gansu, China | L | 11 | 39.71 | H4(4), H9(4), H10(1), 13(1)*, H14(1) | 0.782 ± 0.095 | 0.337 ± 0.186 |
| JinMa1 | Shanxi, China | B | 11 | 37.3 | H4(2), H9(9) | 0.327 ± 0.153 | 0.190 ± 0.109 |
| C274 | Xinjiang, China | L | 11 | 37.16 | H9(11) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| C467 | Qinghai, China | L | 10 | 36.43 | H9(7), H19(2)*, H20(1)* | 0.511 ± 0.164 | 0.213 ± 0.122 |
| C468 | Shandong, China | L | 10 | 36.13 | H1(9), H2(1) | 0.200 ± 0.154 | 0.006 ± 0.008 |
| C292 | Gansu, China | L | 10 | 36.03 | H9(8), H14(1), H17(1)* | 0.378 ± 0.181 | 0.135 ± 0.081 |
| C224 | Anhui, China | L | 11 | 31.45 | H3(11) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| C666 | Tibet, China | L | 10 | 29.72 | H10(8), H18(2) | 0.356 ± 0.159 | 0.069 ± 0.046 |
| C269 | Tibet, China | L | 8 | 29.71 | H9(4), H10(4) | 0.571 ± 0.095 | 0.126 ± 0.079 |
| C290 | Guizhou, China | L | 10 | 26.87 | H10(10) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| C001 | Yunnan, China | L | 10 | 25.60 | H10(10) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| C218 | Guangxi, China | L | 10 | 24.15 | H5(10) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| YunMa7 | Yunnan, China | B | 10 | 23.36 | H23(10)* | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Kompolti | Hungary | B | 8 | H1(8) | 0.000 | 0.000 | |
| Futura75 | France | B | 10 | H1(7), H15(2)*, 16(1)* | 0.511 ± 0.164 | 0.093 ± 0.059 | |
| Afghanica | The Netherlands (70% indica, 30% sativa) | B | 2 | H9(2) | |||
| Dame Blanche | The Netherlands (80% indica, 20% sativa) | B | 2 | H9(2) | |||
| Purple Kush | USA ( | B | 1 | H9(1) | |||
| Carmagnola | Italy ( | B | 1 | H12(1) | |||
| Dagestani | Russia ( | B | 1 | H24(1)* | |||
| Yoruba Nigeria | Nigeria, Africa ( | B | 1 | H25(1)* | |||
| Cheungsam | Korea ( | B | 1 | H1(1) | |||
| Liaoning and Anhui, China | O | 2 | |||||
| Yunnan, China | O | 1 | |||||
| Czech ( | O | 1 | |||||
| China ( | O | 1 |
W, wild; L, Landrace (domesticated, locally adapted, traditional variety); B, Breeding (cultivar selected by humans for desirable traits); O, Out group; No., sample size; Hd, haplotype diversity; π, nucleotide diversity; Nh, number of haplotype; .
Figure 1Geographic location of the 43 populations of Cannabis analyzed in the present study and haplogroup distribution patterns of Cannabis (see Table 1 for population codes); population codes in black represent the wild samples and blue ones are the domesticated accessions. (B) The haplotype network generated from the 25 haplotypes of Cannabis; pie chart size corresponds to the sample size of each population (A) or haplotype (B).
Primer pairs of cpDNA regions used in this study and polymorphism on the 645 individuals of Cannabis.
| rps16Cf: TTAAAATAGCAGAGAAAAGATTAT rps16Hf: GCAGAGAAAAAAAAGATTCTAATCC rps16Cr: AAACGATGTGGTAGAAAGCAAC | 58 | 1081–1084 | 6 | 0 | 6 | 0.521 | 7 | |
| 55 | 813–822 | 5 | 1 | 6 | 0.679 | 5 | ||
| 55 | 720 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0.614 | 3 | ||
| 53 | 389–420 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 0.529 | 5 | ||
| 47 58 | 604-620 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 0.775 | 6 | ||
| Total | - | - | 3616–3645 | 19 | 4 | 23 | 0.848 | 25 |
Cf, the forward primer for Cannabis; Cr, the reverse primer for Cannabis; Hf, the reverse primer for Humulus. The four Indels: AAATATT; GAATTGAAAAAAAAA; TATATTAAAA; AAAAAT.
Figure 2(A) Bayesian phylogenetic tree based on cpDNA data. (B) Divergence time estimated for the major clades of Cannabis by the BAEST analysis (Blue bars indicate the 95% highest posterior density credibility for node ages).
ANOVA analyses between BioClim variables and the three cpDNA haplogroup frequencies for 43 Cannabis populations.
| MDL | Mean day length (Spring Equinox-Autumnal eq uinox) | 1 | 0.208027 | 29.0255 | 0.001 |
| bio2 | Mean diurnal range [mean of monthly (max temp–min temp)] | 1 | 0.009598 | 1.3391 | 0.256 |
| bio8 | Mean temperature of wettest quarter | 1 | 0.051886 | 7.2395 | 0.002 |
| bio13 | Precipitation of wettest month | 1 | 0.043932 | 6.1297 | 0.004 |
| bio14 | Precipitation of driest month | 1 | 0.002271 | 0.3169 | 0.756 |
| bio15 | Precipitation seasonality (coefficient of variation) | 1 | 0.00323 | 0.4506 | 0.64 |
| Residual | 36 | 0.258014 |
(*p < 0.05;
p < 0.01;
p < 0.001).
Analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) for on the Cannabis populations from China based on the five cpDNA regions.
| Among groups | 2 | 2497.697 | 6.18572 | 69.48 | 0.69478*** |
| Among populations within groups | 40 | 789.902 | 1.28440 | 14.43 | 0.47264*** |
| Within populations | 575 | 824.019 | 1.43308 | 16.10 | 0.83904*** |
| Total | 617 | 4111.618 | 8.90320 | ||
| Among groups | 1 | 113.560 | 0.16155 | 2.34 | 0.02345n.s. |
| Among populations within groups | 41 | 3174.039 | 5.29484 | 76.85 | 0.78700*** |
| Within populations | 575 | 3174.039 | 1.43308 | 20.80 | 0.79199*** |
| Total | 617 | 4111.618 | 6.88947 | ||
| Among populations | 42 | 3287.599 | 5.36510 | 78.92 | |
| Within populations | 575 | 824.019 | 1.43308 | 21.08 | 0.78920*** |
| Total | 617 | 4111.618 | 6.79817 | ||
n.s., not significant; .
Population genetic statistics among Cannabis population groups based on SAMOVA grouping, the two morphology groups (wild & domesticated) and all samples from China.
| 16 | 267 | 9 | 0.716 ± 0.016 | 0.159 ± 0.084 | −1.013( | 10.109( | 0.32 | 0.607 | |
| 16 | 219 | 13 | 0.500 ± 0.039 | 0.180 ± 0.094 | 0.729( | 6.390( | 1.20 | 0.294 | |
| 11 | 132 | 6 | 0.690 ± 0.022 | 0.059 ± 0.036 | −0.007( | 2.767( | 1.52 | 0.247 | |
| 25 | 430 | 11 | 0.838 ± 0.008 | 0.379 ± 0.189 | 1.392( | 32.064( | 0.11 | 0.820 | |
| 18 | 188 | 15 | 0.810 ± 0.015 | 0.311 ± 0.157 | 1.813( | 11.904( | 0.15 | 0.768 | |
| 43 | 618 | 21 | 0.848 ± 0.006 | 0.367 ± 0.183 | 1.103( | 18.956( | 0.12 | 0.802 |
Np, number of populations; Ns, sample size; Nh, number of haplotype; Hd, haplotype diversity; π, nucleotide diversity; D, Tajima's D; Fs, Fu's Fs; Nm, number of effective migrants; Fst, fixation index; n.s., not significant (p > 0.05).