Atul Anand1, Anoop S V Shah1,2, Agim Beshiri3, Allan S Jaffe4, Nicholas L Mills5,2. 1. BHF Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK. 2. Usher Institute of Population Health Sciences and Informatics, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK. 3. Medical and Scientific Affairs, Abbott Diagnostics, Chicago, IL. 4. Division of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic and Medical School, Rochester, MN. 5. BHF Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK; nick.mills@ed.ac.uk.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The universal definition of myocardial infarction (UDMI) standardizes the approach to the diagnosis and management of myocardial infarction. High-sensitivity cardiac troponin testing is recommended because these assays have improved precision at low concentrations, but concerns over specificity may have limited their implementation. METHODS: We undertook a global survey of 1902 medical centers in 23 countries evenly distributed across 5 continents to assess adoption of key recommendations from the UDMI. Respondents involved in the diagnosis and management of patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome completed a structured telephone questionnaire detailing the primary biomarker, diagnostic thresholds, and clinical pathways used to identify myocardial infarction. RESULTS: Cardiac troponin was the primary diagnostic biomarker at 96% of surveyed sites. Only 41% of centers had adopted high-sensitivity assays, with wide variation from 7% in North America to 60% in Europe. Sites using high-sensitivity troponin more frequently used serial sampling pathways (91% vs 78%) and the 99th percentile diagnostic threshold (74% vs 66%) than sites using previous-generation assays. Furthermore, high-sensitivity institutions more often used earlier serial sampling (≤3 h) and accelerated diagnostic pathways. Fewer than 1 in 5 high-sensitivity sites had adopted sex-specific thresholds (18%). CONCLUSIONS: There has been global progress toward the recommendations of the UDMI, particularly in the use of the 99th percentile diagnostic threshold and serial sampling. However, high-sensitivity assays are still used by a minority of sites, and sex-specific thresholds by even fewer. Additional efforts are required to improve risk stratification and diagnosis of patients with myocardial infarction.
BACKGROUND: The universal definition of myocardial infarction (UDMI) standardizes the approach to the diagnosis and management of myocardial infarction. High-sensitivity cardiac troponin testing is recommended because these assays have improved precision at low concentrations, but concerns over specificity may have limited their implementation. METHODS: We undertook a global survey of 1902 medical centers in 23 countries evenly distributed across 5 continents to assess adoption of key recommendations from the UDMI. Respondents involved in the diagnosis and management of patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome completed a structured telephone questionnaire detailing the primary biomarker, diagnostic thresholds, and clinical pathways used to identify myocardial infarction. RESULTS: Cardiac troponin was the primary diagnostic biomarker at 96% of surveyed sites. Only 41% of centers had adopted high-sensitivity assays, with wide variation from 7% in North America to 60% in Europe. Sites using high-sensitivity troponin more frequently used serial sampling pathways (91% vs 78%) and the 99th percentile diagnostic threshold (74% vs 66%) than sites using previous-generation assays. Furthermore, high-sensitivity institutions more often used earlier serial sampling (≤3 h) and accelerated diagnostic pathways. Fewer than 1 in 5 high-sensitivity sites had adopted sex-specific thresholds (18%). CONCLUSIONS: There has been global progress toward the recommendations of the UDMI, particularly in the use of the 99th percentile diagnostic threshold and serial sampling. However, high-sensitivity assays are still used by a minority of sites, and sex-specific thresholds by even fewer. Additional efforts are required to improve risk stratification and diagnosis of patients with myocardial infarction.
Authors: Odayme Quesada; Omeed Elboudwarej; Michael D Nelson; Ahmed Al-Badri; Mitra Mastali; Janet Wei; Bijan Zarrabi; Nissi Suppogu; Haider Aldiwani; Puja Mehta; Chrisandra Shufelt; Galen Cook-Wiens; Daniel S Berman; Louise E J Thomson; Eileen Handberg; Carl J Pepine; Jennifer E Van Eyk; C Noel Bairey Merz Journal: Am Heart J Plus Date: 2022-03-03
Authors: Kiril M Stoyanov; Hauke Hund; Moritz Biener; Jochen Gandowitz; Christoph Riedle; Julia Löhr; Matthias Mueller-Hennessen; Mehrshad Vafaie; Hugo A Katus; Evangelos Giannitsis Journal: Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care Date: 2019-07-12
Authors: Dimitrios Doudesis; Kuan Ken Lee; Jason Yang; Ryan Wereski; Anoop S V Shah; Athanasios Tsanas; Atul Anand; John W Pickering; Martin P Than; Nicholas L Mills Journal: Lancet Digit Health Date: 2022-05
Authors: Ahmed AlBadri; Janet Wei; Odayme Quesada; Puja K Mehta; Yi Xiao; Yi-An Ko; R David Anderson; John Petersen; Babak Azarbal; Bruce Samuels; Timothy D Henry; Galen Cook-Wiens; Eileen M Handberg; Jennifer Van Eyk; Carl J Pepine; C Noel Bairey Merz Journal: Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol Date: 2020-10-08 Impact factor: 10.514
Authors: Kuan Ken Lee; Amy V Ferry; Atul Anand; Fiona E Strachan; Andrew R Chapman; Dorien M Kimenai; Steven J R Meex; Colin Berry; Iain Findlay; Alan Reid; Anne Cruickshank; Alasdair Gray; Paul O Collinson; Fred S Apple; David A McAllister; Donogh Maguire; Keith A A Fox; David E Newby; Chris Tuck; Catriona Keerie; Christopher J Weir; Anoop S V Shah; Nicholas L Mills Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2019-10-22 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Evangelos Giannitsis; Tania Garfias-Veitl; Anna Slagman; Julia Searle; Christian Müller; Stefan Blankenberg; Stephan von Haehling; Hugo A Katus; Christian W Hamm; Kurt Huber; Jörn O Vollert; Martin Möckel Journal: Cells Date: 2022-01-08 Impact factor: 6.600
Authors: Evangelos Giannitsis; Stefan Blankenberg; Robert H Christenson; Norbert Frey; Stephan von Haehling; Christian W Hamm; Kenji Inoue; Hugo A Katus; Chien-Chang Lee; James McCord; Martin Möckel; Jack Tan Wei Chieh; Marco Tubaro; Kai C Wollert; Kurt Huber Journal: Clin Res Cardiol Date: 2021-02-26 Impact factor: 5.460