Literature DB >> 30625413

The hypervirulent Coxiella burnetii Guiana strain compared in silico, in vitro and in vivo to the Nine Mile and the German strain.

C Melenotte1, A Caputo1, Y Bechah1, H Lepidi2, J Terras1, M Kowalczewska1, F Di Pinto1, C Nappez1, D Raoult3, F Brégeon4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Q fever epidemic outbreaks have been reported in French Guiana and in The Netherlands. To determine whether the C. burnetii strains involved in these epidemics had a peculiar virulence pattern, we compared the pathogenicity of the Guiana and the German strain (a clone of The Netherlands strain), in silico, in vitro, and in vivo versus the Nine Mile strain.
METHOD: The pan-genomes of the Guiana (Cb175), German (Z3055), and the referent Nine Mile (RSA 493) C. burnetii strains were compared. In vitro, the growth rate and the morphological presentation were compared. In vivo (SCID and Balb/c mice), weight loss, histological lesions, C. burnetii bacterial load in deep organs, and serological response were reported according to each C. burnetii strain studied.
RESULTS: The Guiana strain had 77 times more missing genes and 12 times more unique genes than the German strain. The Guiana strain presented as large cell variants (LCVs) and led to the most pronounced fatality rate in SCID mice (100% at 4 weeks). The German strain presented as small cell variants (SCVs), and had an intermediate fatality rate (75% at 4 weeks). Both the Guiana and the German strains led to a significant higher serological response at 2 and 4 weeks post infection (p <0.05).
CONCLUSION: The Guiana strain was the most virulent strain, followed by the German strain and the referent Nine Mile strain. Unique and missing genes could be implicated but further investigations are necessary to specify their role.
Copyright © 2019 European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Coxiella burnetii; German; Guiana; In silico; In vitro; In vivo; Netherlands; Outbreak; Q fever; Serology; Virulence

Year:  2019        PMID: 30625413     DOI: 10.1016/j.cmi.2018.12.039

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect        ISSN: 1198-743X            Impact factor:   8.067


  6 in total

1.  High endemicity of Q fever in French Guiana: A cross sectional study (2007-2017).

Authors:  Pauline Thill; Carole Eldin; Laureen Dahuron; Alain Berlioz-Artaud; Magalie Demar; Mathieu Nacher; Emmanuel Beillard; Félix Djossou; Loïc Epelboin
Journal:  PLoS Negl Trop Dis       Date:  2022-05-18

Review 2.  Investigating SARS-CoV-2 Susceptibility in Animal Species: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Connor Rutherford; Pratap Kafle; Catherine Soos; Tasha Epp; Lori Bradford; Emily Jenkins
Journal:  Environ Health Insights       Date:  2022-06-28

3.  Tropical Q Fever.

Authors:  Gilbert J Kersh
Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  2022-07-11       Impact factor: 3.707

4.  Q Fever as a Cause of Community-Acquired Pneumonia in French Guiana.

Authors:  Loïc Epelboin; Aba Mahamat; Timothée Bonifay; Magalie Demar; Philippe Abboud; Gaëlle Walter; Anne-Sophie Drogoul; Alain Berlioz-Arthaud; Mathieu Nacher; Didier Raoult; Félix Djossou; Carole Eldin
Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  2022-08-17       Impact factor: 3.707

5.  Transmission of Coxiella burnetii by ingestion in mice.

Authors:  H K Miller; R A Priestley; G J Kersh
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2020-02-05       Impact factor: 2.451

6.  Correlating Genotyping Data of Coxiella burnetii with Genomic Groups.

Authors:  Claudia M Hemsley; Angela Essex-Lopresti; Isobel H Norville; Richard W Titball
Journal:  Pathogens       Date:  2021-05-14
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.